Interesting I'll try it after nobody is finding aluminum dust a year or two after it's release. Thanks for "educating" us on that one, @FlowerMillJohn.spendy at $170 but 3 coarseness plates and slicing blades instead of tearing teeth seems like it would be more like using a razor knife to cut up the buds (the way I usually do at home) leaving more stickies on the buds instead of the grinder teeth.
cheaper than some though
You're kidding of course.maybe a flowermill then for a toothless option
I've had this Høj grinder for a couple of years. it's a really well engineered piece of gear. My only complaint is that the blades don't slice/grind sticky/icky flower very well. the flower gunks up the blades. the product is extremely easy to clean because its all held together by magnets. So, I give the overall product 3 out of 5 stars.spendy at $170 but 3 coarseness plates and slicing blades instead of tearing teeth seems like it would be more like using a razor knife to cut up the buds (the way I usually do at home) leaving more stickies on the buds instead of the grinder teeth.
cheaper than some though
I would go aluminum over stainless, being lightweight is really valuable imo. Cant tell you how many times ive accidentally bumped into a glass piece with my bcg while stoned out of my mind, id hate to think of all the broken glass that wouldve resulted if the grinder was significantly heavier.Thanks Dank, That's exactly what I needed to know. My whole deal is trying to keep as much of the stickyummies on the plant matter as possible for which my $1 snapblade works best, but it's a slow process. The auto9 continues to impress me for the speed and ease of filling capsules, and the BCG works (and looks) great so I'll end up getting large one too, just got to decide if it's worth it for stainless.