Found some interesting things about cannabanoids.

[Konrad_Zuse]

So I was looking up some things regarding "runners high" and such, and I found some cool links pertaining to it.

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20050101/msgs/436411.html

Is a study conducted at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of California about what causes runner's high, and it explains how the body produces the same effects because of these endo-cannabinoids, or naturally occuring cannabinoid.

http://www.chocolate.org/
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro04/web1/kcoveleskie.html

Apparently chocolate can get you stoned if you eat enough of it. It contains anandamide which is an endo-cannabinoid, and I guess that's why it's a favorite munchy . You can also look it up on wiki, it also contains Phenethylamine which is like a love chemical, I guess "sexual choclate really exists haha."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenethylamine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chocolate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anandamide

Pretty interesting stuff, I hope you enjoy it. No bashing me please .

 

[macbill]

No bashing me please .

Fuckcombustion seems to lack bashers of knowledge, although I might be wrong. Thanks for pointing out the info.

I will never get too smart to learn something new or review something known.

 

[Konrad_Zuse]

No bashing me please .

Fuckcombustion seems to lack bashers of knowledge, although I might be wrong. Thanks for pointing out the info.

I will never get too smart to learn something new or review something known.

What are you talking about? I'm confused, and vaked now .

Also I learned a lot from the endo-cannabinoid thing, and that lead to chocolate. So there could possibly more foods that could give off this same thing? Maybe that's why when people are like "yeah you can smoke bananas, peanuts," and stuff like that there could be some truth to it.

 

[Hanibal Lectin]

get some raw cacao and eat about 5-6 tblsp and you will feel it....nice alternative to caffeine

 

[Howie Feltersnatch]

No bashing me please .

Fuckcombustion seems to lack bashers of knowledge, although I might be wrong. Thanks for pointing out the info.

I will never get too smart to learn something new or review something known.

He is referring to me in another thread.

The thing is, I don't bash actual knowledge - just junk science that is put forth as fact.

The "study" is 7 years old and basically claims that endorphins are NOT responsible for the "runner's high." Of course it is the only study that claims this and is refuted by dozens if not hundreds of studies clearly describing endorphins and their effects.

Oh, and Konrad ... the psychoactive properties of chocolate are pretty well-known for oh, I don't know a thousand years or more? Ask a woman if she prefers sex or chocolate and be prepared for disappointment!

 

[Lo]

the psychoactive properties of chocolate are pretty well-known for oh, I don't know a thousand years or more?

Yup!!

 

[Konrad_Zuse]

No bashing me please .

Fuckcombustion seems to lack bashers of knowledge, although I might be wrong. Thanks for pointing out the info.

I will never get too smart to learn something new or review something known.

He is referring to me in another thread.

The thing is, I don't bash actual knowledge - just junk science that is put forth as fact.

The "study" is 7 years old and basically claims that endorphins are NOT responsible for the "runner's high." Of course it is the only study that claims this and is refuted by dozens if not hundreds of studies clearly describing endorphins and their effects.

Oh, and Konrad ... the psychoactive properties of chocolate are pretty well-known for oh, I don't know a thousand years or more? Ask a woman if she prefers sex or chocolate and be prepared for disappointment!

Look up "runner's high and cannabinoids" you're pewing useless garbage and opinions without providing me or anyone else facts. Your last post you basically contridicting yourself saying "Oh yeah this is this" then saying everything science proved is wrong and calling it "junk science." This isn't the only site I put up, maybe try looking at it. As for studies about it 7 years ago, when does information become bad? Information keeps getting updated when new information comes about, old studies aren't wrong, just edited. Maybe you should take a course on logic, it might suit you.

You're saying a study conducted at not only 2 universities, in that post, but in other places are wrong?
You're saying there is no such thing as endo-cannabinoids? What are you failing to prove to me now?

And as for chocolate most people know it's a love food, but you did know what it does to your brain? Do you know exactly what goes on? Before spewing "oh yeah everyone knows about that for thousands of years," well probably not, because you seem to not even know much about it. You're cool man you're too smart for this forum, you should become your own scientist, go make your own vape too, you're iq must be sooooooo high. You're not even posting facts, good day.

NOTE: I'm not going to come back here, I have no need to spam this forum arguing with you, and I'm not going to get in trouble for doing so.