BillyBudd
New Member
Hey FC, my first post here although I've lurked for years to get advice and information on devices, techniques and edibles. I love this site and am so glad all your guys are here advocating, criticizing and making the vaping world better.
My primary goal these days when purchasing a new device is "will my wife be able to use it?" She has primary progressive MS, has little sensitivity in her fingers and poor strength in her hands. This in addition to being in a wheelchair makes things especially difficult for her to manage on her own at times.
With all the new devices that have been released over the last year or two, and the plethora of new ones on the horizon, I've seen little focused discussion on the functionality of these devices for the disabled. This is something that I think should be key in all device designs, yet seems to be an after thought in almost all that I have seen. If a designer comes across this thread and would like any specific feedback feel free to ask here on in a PM, I'm here to help make things better for people like my wife.
I wanted to just throw a couple of design elements that i'd like you to consider when prototyping a new device or an update to an existing one.
Buttons: Buttons should be fairly easy to push, should be raised a little to make them easier to discern, and using combinations of buttons to access certain functionality should be avoided. Our current favorite device is the Solo, but it can be difficult for my wife to press both of the buttons at the same time to turn the device on.
Chamber: Access to the chamber to load and empty is perhaps the biggest challenge I see in most designs regarding ease of use for the disabled. The mechanism to open the chamber should be as simple to operate as possible (the magnetic style of the pax is nice), again avoiding the requirement to use both hands simultaneously to open or lock after its loaded (like having to hold in a button/lock with one hand while opening the chamber with the other). What seems simple to most can really be very challenging and difficult for others depending on their disability.
Safety: Although we love the Solo, she has burned herself many times with the glass mouthpiece after a session. Using materials that don't conduct heat as much would be interesting to see (while still maintaining the pure taste of using glass), anything that could help the less coordinated keep from hurting themselves after use. As long as the flower mixture gets to the right temp is all that matters right? :-)
My primary goal these days when purchasing a new device is "will my wife be able to use it?" She has primary progressive MS, has little sensitivity in her fingers and poor strength in her hands. This in addition to being in a wheelchair makes things especially difficult for her to manage on her own at times.
With all the new devices that have been released over the last year or two, and the plethora of new ones on the horizon, I've seen little focused discussion on the functionality of these devices for the disabled. This is something that I think should be key in all device designs, yet seems to be an after thought in almost all that I have seen. If a designer comes across this thread and would like any specific feedback feel free to ask here on in a PM, I'm here to help make things better for people like my wife.
I wanted to just throw a couple of design elements that i'd like you to consider when prototyping a new device or an update to an existing one.
Buttons: Buttons should be fairly easy to push, should be raised a little to make them easier to discern, and using combinations of buttons to access certain functionality should be avoided. Our current favorite device is the Solo, but it can be difficult for my wife to press both of the buttons at the same time to turn the device on.
Chamber: Access to the chamber to load and empty is perhaps the biggest challenge I see in most designs regarding ease of use for the disabled. The mechanism to open the chamber should be as simple to operate as possible (the magnetic style of the pax is nice), again avoiding the requirement to use both hands simultaneously to open or lock after its loaded (like having to hold in a button/lock with one hand while opening the chamber with the other). What seems simple to most can really be very challenging and difficult for others depending on their disability.
Safety: Although we love the Solo, she has burned herself many times with the glass mouthpiece after a session. Using materials that don't conduct heat as much would be interesting to see (while still maintaining the pure taste of using glass), anything that could help the less coordinated keep from hurting themselves after use. As long as the flower mixture gets to the right temp is all that matters right? :-)