Hello, FC! Brand new member, relatively new to smoking, never vaped before. I've always had to smoke through water since hot smoke causes too much coughing, but even then I don't want to be inhaling burning plant matter, plus water filters out components that I do want as well as ones I don't want. So, this seems like the perfect place to be to investigate alternatives!
There's a ton of information here on the forums, and I still need to go through the respective threads more thoroughly for the vapes I've narrowed my choice down to, but that's literally hundreds of pages of posts. And while normally I would lurk for a couple weeks and read up on all of those before delurking for a first post, there's a Cyber Monday sale today that I want to take advantage of.
It's starting to feel like there isn't an obviously *bad* choice. I had been debating between the PAX and the DaVinci, and had almost made my decision until I ran across excellent reviews of the Arizer Solo this evening. I'm leaning away from the PAX despite all the amazing reviews because I do need very tight odor control (which the DaVinci is supposed to have), and I'm wary of reports of the mouthpiece sticking. Also, the fans of the PAX sound suspiciously similar to the Apple fanatics, and while I'm a Mac and iPhone user myself and can appreciate the gorgeous aesthetic of the PAX, practicality wins out over a pretty accessory and even PAX proponents admit it has a couple practical design flaws. The DaVinci vs the Solo, though? It's a really hard choice! The Solo seems to be a lot more popular, and I can't seem to see why. Just because it's been out longer? Can anyone comment on why the Solo is really popular and the PAX has gotten a *huge* following in just a month or so (likely the sleek and sexy design), but the DaVinci seems like the red-headed stepchild of vapes? With the Cyber Monday discount, if I'm reading it right, then the DV and the Solo are significantly cheaper than the PAX, which pretty much takes the PAX out of the running for me. And yet I'd still probably enjoy the PAX quite a lot if I got one.
So, I think my next step will be to read as much about the Solo and the DaVinci in the product threads here as I can in my free time (hah!) tomorrow, and make a decision tomorrow night. If, in the meantime, anyone has a reason *not* to get the DaVinci or a comment on how much better the vapor is out of the Solo than the DaVinci, I would love to hear some input!
(As a footnote, since it may come up, here are the criteria I've been using to select a vape: max price of $250, preferably under $200; strong hits with more efficiency than combustion; supports up to 2 users.; strongly prefer portable; and an easy learning curve. And adjustable temperature control. Thanks!)
There's a ton of information here on the forums, and I still need to go through the respective threads more thoroughly for the vapes I've narrowed my choice down to, but that's literally hundreds of pages of posts. And while normally I would lurk for a couple weeks and read up on all of those before delurking for a first post, there's a Cyber Monday sale today that I want to take advantage of.
It's starting to feel like there isn't an obviously *bad* choice. I had been debating between the PAX and the DaVinci, and had almost made my decision until I ran across excellent reviews of the Arizer Solo this evening. I'm leaning away from the PAX despite all the amazing reviews because I do need very tight odor control (which the DaVinci is supposed to have), and I'm wary of reports of the mouthpiece sticking. Also, the fans of the PAX sound suspiciously similar to the Apple fanatics, and while I'm a Mac and iPhone user myself and can appreciate the gorgeous aesthetic of the PAX, practicality wins out over a pretty accessory and even PAX proponents admit it has a couple practical design flaws. The DaVinci vs the Solo, though? It's a really hard choice! The Solo seems to be a lot more popular, and I can't seem to see why. Just because it's been out longer? Can anyone comment on why the Solo is really popular and the PAX has gotten a *huge* following in just a month or so (likely the sleek and sexy design), but the DaVinci seems like the red-headed stepchild of vapes? With the Cyber Monday discount, if I'm reading it right, then the DV and the Solo are significantly cheaper than the PAX, which pretty much takes the PAX out of the running for me. And yet I'd still probably enjoy the PAX quite a lot if I got one.
So, I think my next step will be to read as much about the Solo and the DaVinci in the product threads here as I can in my free time (hah!) tomorrow, and make a decision tomorrow night. If, in the meantime, anyone has a reason *not* to get the DaVinci or a comment on how much better the vapor is out of the Solo than the DaVinci, I would love to hear some input!
(As a footnote, since it may come up, here are the criteria I've been using to select a vape: max price of $250, preferably under $200; strong hits with more efficiency than combustion; supports up to 2 users.; strongly prefer portable; and an easy learning curve. And adjustable temperature control. Thanks!)