biojuggernaut
Snob
yooo lets chill homie. Im in NE!
From what i have found Out THc needs the highest temp, about 205c
This study recommends 446f for (1) maximum cannabinoid content, and (2) maximized ratio of cannabinoids to other byproducts.
I have been running my LBCB (little black chinese box) at 386 for 14 months now believing that hotter was better. But lately I've found the vapor gets harsh and hot and hurts my throat.Personally, I would only use the temp on any vaporizers as somewhat of a gauge to help you achieve your "sweet spot" right away, on a daily basis. I wouldn't fixate over temp's and what not.
My keys to know if I'm vaping right:
Flavor
Smell
Color (golden-brown, baked herbs!)
Vapor Production (Vapor/Air ratio; any experienced vaporist will know if they are getting a good hit, regardless of temp, solely based off of vapor production and quality).
Add more!
But after reading this thread I tried vaping at 368 and found it gave a good result without the loss of consciousness that sometimes happens at the higher temp ...and more importantly, no bad feelings in my throat.
Have you read the article, or just the abstract?This study recommends 446f for (1) maximum cannabinoid content, and (2) maximized ratio of cannabinoids to other byproducts.
The best temperature to vape is 190C or 374F. Setting 3 on my Arizer Solo.
Have you read the article, or just the abstract?
I have read the full study, and I can tell you that chernn is correct, that is what the study says.
The problem here is that this study, and every other one I have read, does not take into account the results of stepping up through the temperatures. 446°F (230°C) has maximum cannibinoid content and the best ratio to undesirable by-products because that temperature is high enough to release almost all the cannibinoids at the same time. Note that this high temperature also increases the amount of undesirables, but the ratio is reduced because of the greater increase of desirables.
The study tests at 170°C, 200°C, and 230°C. They do not take the sample vapourized at 170°C and see what happens when you re-vapourize at 200°C, yet this is a common and I think more likely method. At each of the two lower temperatures, the ratio of undesirables to cannibinoids is higher than at 230°C, but it is not clear what ratios you would see if you stepped up through the temperatures, which is the way I and many others use our devices. Ultimately, if you go all the way to 230°C then it seems to me that you will release exactly the same amount of cannibinoids and tars whether you stepped up or went directly there, so at the end the ratio ought to be the same. If that is the case, and the initial temperature had a higher ratio than the high temperature (230°C), then the ratio at the intermediate steps must be lower. Indeed, the study shows that as temperature increases, the ratio drops.
I don't like high temperatures because the taste is much worse and the vapour is much harsher on my throat and lungs. I might not be releasing as much of the desirable components, but I have my ABV to process if I want to recover more. I still get the effects I'm after, which might not be true for people seeking relief from pain, nausea, or insomnia. What this study does confirm is that vaporizing does dramatically (their word) reduce the amount of undesirable components compared to combustion.
I do think a lot of people start too low though, much below 180C and you won't get vaporization of most cannabinoids. I wish I could cite studies but I did not save them as they were presented to me.
Sneaking in a WC or something and be ready in a couple of minutes and for the next couple of hours is just FANTASTIC. Couldn't do that with my weaker LB... ;P