Senator looks to legalize medical marijuana in Texas
AUSTIN -- Physicians and patients came out in full force Tuesday to support a proposed medical cannabis bill that will be considered in the Texas Legislature next year.
Senate Bill 269, which was filed Tuesday morning, would allow patients with debilitating or chronic conditions to receive medical cannabis under their doctor's recommendation. The bill would expand on a 2015 Texas law that allows patients to receive certain forms of cannabis if they have intractable epilepsy.
Sen. José Menéndez, D-San Antonio, who authored the proposed bill, said the law is helpful but excludes many Texans who have other conditions that could benefit from cannabis treatment. (cont)
How the U.S. Patent Office Screws Over the Cannabis Industry
The next quantum leap forward for the cannabis industry won’t be in banking or tax codes, though most marijuana firms would love the ability to put their money in a bank or claim business expenses on their annual returns like a normal entrepreneur.
It’ll be in branding and intellectual property—because as one vape-pen producer is finding out, in addition to the prohibitions on checking accounts and normal tax accounting, cannabis companies can’t trademark their own brands.
JUJU Joints makes single-use, cigarette-sized disposable vaporizers. They’re cool enough, but what would be cooler for the company is if the company had absolute rights to the name JUJU, and maybe even a slogan—like “powered by JUJU,” which no other company was allowed to use.
Keep in mind that while the federal government has issued patents to cannabis companies and even cannabis strains, registered trademarks are another issue. Up until now, cannabis companies have protected their brands by registering them as, say, a clothing company.
In this way, dispensaries like San Francisco’s Green Cross and cannabis-related brands like Cookies have been able to protect their identities while still being involved with marijuana—which, in case you’ve forgotten, remains banned under the federal Controlled Substances Act.
But JUJU doesn’t do beanies or hoodies, they do JUJU Joints. And as it explained in a recent precedent-setting opinion, the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board doesn’t do cannabis. (cont)
Ganja Greed in Guam: Politicians vs. the People
While we can only applaud
Guam’s continuing march toward freedom, we can only wonder if the government’s motivation for the “Compassionate Cannabis Use Act” is, in fact, compassion.
Sure, the
original bill passed with a unanimous vote, but the newly added provision allowing up to six plants to be cultivated in patients’ homes barely made it in with an 8-7 split—meaning at least seven of Guam’s senators are fine with medical weed, but only if they can control the profits.
This makes it easy to see why many activists are starting to call the island not by its native name of Guam, or Gu’ahan in the indigenous Chamorro language, but by the Spanish name that Magellan gave it in 1521: “la Isla de los Ladrones,” or “the Island of the Thieves”.
It also means the governor, Eddie Calvo, who has stood in opposition of all medical cannabis and especially homegrown pot, could easily veto the new rules, sending patients desperately waiting for relief right to the back of the bus—a bus that Calvo is trying to ensure can only be driven by the moneyed interests keeping him in office.
If he does decide to veto, the governor would be putting the people of the island in the same position they were in earlier this year when the rules for medicinal cannabis in Guam were scrapped. Back then, Senator Tina Barnes said that the rules were tossed out because of public concerns. (cont)
I Tried to Buy ‘Prop. 64 Friendly’ Cannabis in California. Here’s What Happened.
Californians voted overwhelmingly to
legalize adult-use cannabis last month, but with the celebratory joints now smoked down to roaches, plenty of Golden State residents are asking whether they can finally dispense with the rigmarole of getting a doctor’s recommendation to buy bud.
Technically, the answer is no. But that hasn’t stopped some medical dispensaries from advertising online that they’re willing to overlook that formality and sell to anyone over 21 with a California ID. And why not relax the standards now? Las Vegas prosecutors pledged to
stop filing charges after that state legalized—why shouldn’t California do the same?
I wanted to know if dispensaries in Los Angeles, the state’s largest medical cannabis market, still gave a damn about the doctor’s note. I didn’t think they would, especially given that
some were boasting online things like “Prop 64 friendly,” “21+ just ID required” and “21+ may now enter with valid ID.” So I dropped in with just some cash and my driver’s license to see what would happen.
Logging some serious freeway time, I hit up dispensaries in Downtown Los Angeles, Pasadena, West Hollywood, Malibu, and Marina Del Rey—six shops in all. At each one, I produced my California ID. And at each one, the folks behind the bulletproof glass or outside the store asked for my doctor’s recommendation, too. (cont)