Interesting responses. The argument against this policy seems to revolve around an individual's right to privacy. I'm not sure how one can support privacy rights without acknowledging the right of a company to set whatever standards it wishes around who they choose to employee. I believe that an individual should be able to do whatever they choose, including illicit drugs, as long as it doesn't adversely impact anyone else. I also believe openvape has the right to set whatever standards they choose; level of education, past employment / experience, criminal record, drug use, credit history etc.
Additionally, if an employee's "recreational" use of meth, heroin, cocaine or whatever other dangerous drugs is a priority they have the right to find an employer with whom their interest align. An employer that is willing to tolerate employees use of those substances in their personal lives. I can't think of a single employer with such a policy.
From what I've read of this on the twitter feed it appears openvape operates labs and various lab equipment, likely extractors, that have the potential to be deadly. I take comfort in knowing the airlines I fly have a drug policy that doesn't allow use of dangerous drugs, even during personal time. If I worked at openvape I would also take comfort knowing my company didn't condone my coworkers using dangerous drugs. Especially when a coworkers mistake can kill me or those around me... depending on the extraction equipment used they could blow up an entire block, I'm sure openvape's neighbors appreciate their policy too.
Be reasonable. We didn't get to where we are today with an all-or-nothing approach. Progress happens incrementally, and a corporate drug policy that allows the use of cannabis in ones personal life is a start!