vapomancer
Well-Known Member
More to the point, who would have been a better choice for a female enterprise captain?
I nominate Helen Mirren
More to the point, who would have been a better choice for a female enterprise captain?
We're all on the same ride, spaceship earth. It's the most awesome starship ever
Yes, she absolutely gets hate because of misogyny. But I do think she was terribly mis-cast. And the writing was absolutely garbage.More to the point, who would have been a better choice for a female enterprise captain?
Did the fact that they were hopelessly lost have anything to do with it lol.
Picard went way further than the Delta or Gamma quadrants... And made it back in time for tea. Like a boss.
He wouldn't have been there in the first place if Q hadn't thrown the ship into Borg space. If memory serves, he begged Q to take them back.
And of course Janeway in the beginning I believe broke the prime directive by destroying technology that was not hers
The prime directive says something about destroying technology that isn't yours? LOL almost everyone in every series should court marshalled if that's the case.
This is how The Sisko teaches, reenacting Alice In Chains songs so the kids learn, the leader takes the heat.
Everyone loves Picard and TNG, but watch like 10 episodes of TNG and then 10 episodes of DS9 (season 2.5+) and you'll see a drastic improvement in how Star Trek stories are told in longform w/ DS9.
In star trek TNG,there was an alien race that had another race addicted to a drug. And even though the doctor felt it was wrong for one race to take advantage of the other race, Pecard put her back in her place, and told her that the directive for bided her even TEllING the other race that it was a drug for addiction.
So just because one race is getting involved in an evil way to take advantage of another race, does not allow the federation to get involved.
The federation needs one of the races to be a part of the Federation and then interference is allowed. But don't get confused. Remember that a treaty does not mean that someone has joined the federation. Treaty and joining are two different things. An example of this is Cardasians abuse towards bajarens. And the federation would not allow themselves to give assistance. Because of the fear. The fear that this would upset the treaty of peace between the Cars and the Federation.
Another example is when the captain in TNG had to use a treaty to be able to save lives by getting 3 weeks to evacuate a planet from this one alien race that would only allow it because of the treaty. In the end of the episode Riker said "you enjoyed that". The captain said "your damn right I did".
By the way Janeway had no problem sharing technology with this hunter race which she was not supposed to do. But she gave holographic tech anyways. Because as all know. She is the anti-christ of the rules.
EDIT. Shoot, sorry, just realized double post. Admin please fix, sorry sorry again.
Modnote: Posts merged. Does the Prime Directive allow for that?
Edit: Oh I am not a supporter of the prime directive. I think it is the worst insane rule of all time.
Now the Marquee, there's a activist group you can fall in love with.
Another rule I can't stand is the Omega Directive.
Now section 31, theres a group that knows how to get things done. And the best part is that they can do anything the Marquee do, even break all the directives without violating the rules of star fleet since they are licensed by star fleet to follow only one directive that star fleet issued them ever since creating 31 as a ranking authority of star fleet.
And that directive being do anything as long as you protect star fleet, and don't get caught in the process.(That even means getting caught by star fleet). Which of course happened.
In star trek TNG,there was an alien race that had another race addicted to a drug. And even though the doctor felt it was wrong for one race to take advantage of the other race, Pecard put her back in her place, and told her that the directive for bided her even TEllING the other race that it was a drug for addiction.
I find all Star trek usually follows the same formula. Crew starts off happy on some mission or adventure, they run into some problem, that problem becomes a seemingly impossible to solve problem with impending doom, Last 5 minutes they use a simple solution that someone discovers, last 2 minutes it is back to business as usual. Rare excemptions to the formula are found, but rare in comparison to the formula.
Torture? Let us compare apples to apples.
Yea, kinda of makes Sisko's plastic IKEA crate seem like Risa.
The entire run of DS9 scoffs at that formula! The crew is rarely happy, and those that are happy are usually in conflict with those that aren't. It took DS9 4 seasons to solve some problems and others were never solved!
There are rumors of a Worf series possibly coming, but it's a question of Paramount allowing it to happen. It would ignore the JJ Abrams fiasco.Whats next. I am sick and tired of waiting for new star trek series. Does anyone know of a series that will finally carry the torch after voyager?
Whats next. I am sick and tired of waiting for new star trek series. Does anyone know of a series that will finally carry the torch after voyager?
1st episode is awesome. Scotty played by Scotty's son, Grant Imahara from Mythbusters as Sulu.The closest thing we have right now is this:
http://www.startrekcontinues.com/
People should recognize a lot of people in this, including a guest star that came back from the original series!
http://www.startrekcontinues.com/episodes/