obelisk said:
... if the device is unable to heat my herb evenly and give an evenly brown residue (note: the emphasis is on evenly brown, not simply brown... I wanna be able to roast my herb nice and brown, uniformly... My concern is uniform heating...
Hi Obelisk,
Give your clearly stated objectives above: that evenness and completeness of extraction (extraction efficiency) as being of a
higher priority than any other, I would
not recommend purchasing the LB! As the manufacturer of the device and as someone who is knowledgeable about the design, etc, I can state positively that the LB was
not designed for perfect extraction -- rather it was designed for convenience.
For
perfect extraction, you need to consider lab chemical methods first, and then perhaps fractional distillation as a distant second. Even reference standard lab grade vaporization equipment is not going to give you perfect extraction -- and such equipment is FAR from portable. Even if such equipment was generally available -- which it certainly is not -- it would be too complicated for anyone without special training to operate! Inconvenient to the max.
In any design, there are multiple, sometimes competing, objectives to be attained. Ultimately, decisions are made about which objectives exactly are going to have a higher priority than which others. Convenience, as measured in terms of availability/portability, reliability, ease of use, stealth, is/was considered to be of a higher priority than simple measures of total herb extraction. Furthermore, the notion of herb extraction 'efficiency' is considered to be significantly less important than the overall measure of the average rate of delivery and total bio-available yield of medicinal components. For example, simply getting the actives out of the herb basis and then letting it condense on some tubing sidewall somewhere is NOT making those actives bio available. Measuring how much active component is left in the spent ABV is NOT therefore an indication of how much was bio available -- in many (most, if not nearly all?) vaporizer devices simply vent a large portion of vapor to the air (by delivering at a greater than bio-adsorption rate) or allowing it to condense somewhere. The real measure of interest is the actual bio-delivery efficiency of the device. Which is better: A device that extracts 95% from the herb but then looses 60% of the actives to indirect venting or condensation, or a device which extracts 70% of the actives but then ultimately delivers nearly 90% of that extract to the bloodstream? Which would you rather have: a device where the ABV looks good, or one which actually gets the job done?
This whole over-driven emphasis on "extraction efficiency" and "ABV examination" is completely bogus marketing hype and does nothing to actually educate the potential vaporizer buyer. Metaphorically, it is a bit like trying to decide what car to buy based *solely* on the criteria of how much unburnt gasoline passes through the engine unburned -- while all along completely ignoring the facts that the transmission might only allow you to go into second gear, the tires are under-inflated or flat, and there is no power steering at all. Sure the engine runs fine and you *could* drive it if you really had to, but it would definitely be so inconvenient to operate that you only rarely actually use it -- rendering the efficiency of the engine's capability to completely burn the gasoline a totally moot point. Personally, I would rather have a car that is decent to actually use and actually gets me where I want to go -- even if there is some unconsumed fuel lost along the way. The real important metric to measure is how many dollars I have to spend every day getting where I need to go,
not whether every single drop of purchased fuel is actually burned by the engine. If overall I am buying less fuel every day, than it is a win even if that particular car is less than totally perfect in its engine efficiency.
Overall, my suggestion to you Obelisk is to either love the Box for what it is or to get rid of it -- give it away or sell it to someone else who might benefit. Trying to coerce the Box into being something it is not is only going to lead to disappointment and frustration all around. The Box is about convenience first, and then absolute bio-delivery efficiency second -- it was never about simple post-op 'extraction' efficiency.
obelisk said:
... I find the whole abv thing very absurd and totally unnecessary/inconvenient.
This reference to the factor of convenience being important is somewhat ironic. No one requires you to keep the ABV -- go ahead and dump it if you find that keeping it is inconvenient. The wonderful thing about life is that we each to get to decide for ourselves what we think is important, what matters to us. You are of course, welcome to your own opinions on that -- indeed this ability to choose, and re-choose for ourselves, is ultimately the basis of all freedom. Please have some (freedom, that is!)
-- Magic-Flight