stinkmeaner said:See the general hostility removes from the actual conversation. I don't see what I did to offend anyone. We are only talking about a product here guys. We should all be friendly even if we don't agree.
In absence of answers i look forward for AroMed v5.0...
No thanks, i'll pass my turn at least until i know there's no heated molybdenum in the air path.
This type of advertising is a failure
reece said:Obviously it's your attitude causing the hostility.
Egzoset said:It's not just StinkMeaner, those questions that were asked i could have asked them myself but i'm glad there was someone in a better position to do that for me. In absence of answers i look forward for reviews about AroMed v5.0...
Aromed can not read airflow with a thermocouple
Hippie Dickie said:Aromed can not read airflow with a thermocouple
not directly, but i'm guessing airflow can be inferred from drop in temperature ... probably depends on the heating characteristics of the bulb -- i'm guessing it must be damn near instantaneous to reach setpoint temperature (also from info about the Oracle vape), so any measured quick heat drop would be mostly from air flow.
and while you can certainly run the calculation 60 times per second, i know my k-type thermocouple can't respond that fast: when using 0.010" leads it requires 0.8 seconds to respond, and the MAX6675 (which converts the thermocouple voltage to temperature) requires 0.25 seconds to do the conversion.
just as a comparison, the Bud Toaster calulates the duty cycle 10 times per second, but only samples the thermocouple 3 times per second.
in case anybody was curious, eh?
HazyDayz said:I love the way you think it can be so easily improved when its been working perfectly for 10 + years
What the hell........?? NOTHING works perfectly and EVERYTHING can be improved.
stinkmeaner said:Hippie Dickie said:Aromed can not read airflow with a thermocouple
not directly, but i'm guessing airflow can be inferred from drop in temperature ... probably depends on the heating characteristics of the bulb -- i'm guessing it must be damn near instantaneous to reach setpoint temperature (also from info about the Oracle vape), so any measured quick heat drop would be mostly from air flow.
and while you can certainly run the calculation 60 times per second, i know my k-type thermocouple can't respond that fast: when using 0.010" leads it requires 0.8 seconds to respond, and the MAX6675 (which converts the thermocouple voltage to temperature) requires 0.25 seconds to do the conversion.
just as a comparison, the Bud Toaster calulates the duty cycle 10 times per second, but only samples the thermocouple 3 times per second.
in case anybody was curious, eh?
Thank you for your Hippie Dickie, I was hoping for you opinion.
I just think the thermocouple is in a overall bad place because it also reads the temperature of the air before it travels across its main heat source (the bulb & the glass cover that screws on around the bulb) that is where the air is going to pick up the most heat.
A smater idea would have been to use two sensors in order to calculate the air flow instead of forcing the customer to watch an indicator and adjust to the machine...
lwien said:HazyDayz said:Pathetic
Someone questioning the validity and challenging the logic of a manufacturer is anything but pathetic. It is, in fact, what will help propel this industry forward.