Hello everyone!
I'm new to this Vape world and have been reading a lot, in these forum and others, as to better understand the options with all its pros and cons.
Since i'm in a bit of a tight budget, i decided to get a vaporgenie as a portable and a glass vapo bowl as my home vape.
But eventually i will invest in a MFLB as a porteable and as a home vape a DBV or an SSV.
The thing is, i hear a lot about how bad it is/might be for the air to go through electronic circuits but i didn't see any proof, just hear say, which is very subjective and prone to many mistakes.
If it tastes not so good as other vapes it can be the materials used, or just ONE part of the air path that is not so adequate to be assembled in a health device like this.
As for the temperature not being acurate, that's a disadvantage but you can taste the diference and with a bit of practice you won't set the temperature high enough to be bad for you.
So, it seems the main argument between 300$ to 50$ vapes is some of the quality of the material, and the eventual hazard to your health from the air path going through circuits and such.
Also, i didn't find any research of the potential hazard of the materials used in the ceramic points or metal points in many aknowleged reliable vapes.
And don't get me wrong, i want to invest in a higher end model. But i don't see any concrete studies about the hazards and benefits of the materials they use, and of the adaptation of certain tools in a vape.
Because if you think of it, a vaporizer needs to:
- Heat the herb
- Isolate the air path
- Have a reliable thermometer and temperature control
And being a device so short lived and with so many inovation so fast, and much of that inovation comes from adapting other devices for the purpose of vaping, it's easy to just take word of mouth as scientific evidence and leave it at that.
IMO, most devices are overpriced and understudied. That said, i'll still problably will pay 200$ for one.
Wish you all the best and i must tell you i love this forum, keep on vaping!