Vaked420
Well-Known Member
Addiction has always intrigued me. How can some do a variety cocktail of drugs daily and seem unphased by addiction, while others seem to not be able to keep video game use under control has always baffled me.
Through my years of observation and personal trials and tribulations of moderate addiction to originally video games, but then weed for a period, I think I have honed in on a view of addiction that seems to make sense to me for the most part.
Often we see addiction as driven by physical dependency on the substance. For example cocaine use floods the system with dopamine, leading to a euphoric state. But come the next day or following repeated use and the body has adapted to the stimulus and supplies less dopamine than necessary and here comes withdrawal symptoms.
But then this doesn't add up when we factor in addiction to non-drug based things like video games, money(this is a whole other topic for me...) and sugar. People will use these to the point where they damage their health, other relationships and hurt themselves. Now this doesn't mean any of these things are inherently bad. I enjoy the occasional video game, I like spending money and I like ice cream as much as the next person, but it is the personal effect that the use has that I deem addiction. My definition of addiction is using something to the point where you are personally no longer happy with your use, whether you are aware of the effect or not. As an example, my mom is always stressed about money, yet can't seem to control her spending when it is obvious to me what she needs to do.
And other more subtle things can be addicting. I have 2 friends specifically who still combust and smoke spliff bowls. And while they roll spliffs and get their nicotine and weed fill, one friend cannot stand being away from his bong at home without having noticeable effects on his mood, while the other seems completely unphased. If he was unhappy with his use he could stop cold turkey any day and that would be that.
My experience has shown that the source of addiction is mainly mental. We begin to perceive the thing we are addicted to in an unrealistic almost delusional view. When I was a high schooler I gamed maybe 3 or 4 hours a day. At the time my parents would tell me that I should play less and that if I did I would thank them later. I was truly convinced they were wrong. I thought that my gaming was a worthwhIle use of my time, that I would never regret it and mainly that I didn't know what else I would do with my time. Now looking back they were so right. The reason I couldn't find anything else to do was because I never invested time in finding other things to do. All that time I could have been advancing my education or pursuing biking further which is now one of my biggest hobbies. I literally don't play video games ay all anymore(not even Pokémon go haha).
But on the flip side of this argument is that things by themselves are not inherently mentally addicting. The best argument I've heard for this is imagine a group of people who are given heroin every day for 3 weeks, then immediately not given it. You would imagine a large portion of the group would have withdrawal symptoms and find themselves craving more. On the other hand if all of those same people were given morphine for the same 3 weeks in a hospital, we would more than likely expect them to be just fine, if anything just needing a couple days to recover. And therein lies the difference to me. It is the perception that leads to the addiction. The heroin is seen as a drug that makes you feel good, and when removed you are craving that high. But when given medicinally, it helps with pain and you must just recover from its effects. The idea that a substance makes you feel good and that the absence of it is no longer enough is what leads to addiction in my mind. That your body recovering from exposure to the substance is not a recovery, but it is your mind telling you that normalcy is no longer enough after experiencing what life is like with the substance.
I'd like to end my long rambling by saying that I in no way think that anyone in any way is addicted to anything unless they think they are. It doesn't matter if you vape 1 gram every year or if you shoot heroin every day for 10 years. The ability to step back from your use, logically and critically understand the effects it has on your life and be able to have the control you feel you need over the substance are what I believe are important to leading a healthy and happy life, which it seems we are all pursuing.
Sorry if this entire post makes very little sense. More than anything I wanted to start a discussion to see how others view addiction. I believe as a community of fairly well educated people who are mostly daily users of a psychoactive substance this is more than likely the community with the best personal experience of addiction and how it has effected our own lives and the lives of those around us.
Through my years of observation and personal trials and tribulations of moderate addiction to originally video games, but then weed for a period, I think I have honed in on a view of addiction that seems to make sense to me for the most part.
Often we see addiction as driven by physical dependency on the substance. For example cocaine use floods the system with dopamine, leading to a euphoric state. But come the next day or following repeated use and the body has adapted to the stimulus and supplies less dopamine than necessary and here comes withdrawal symptoms.
But then this doesn't add up when we factor in addiction to non-drug based things like video games, money(this is a whole other topic for me...) and sugar. People will use these to the point where they damage their health, other relationships and hurt themselves. Now this doesn't mean any of these things are inherently bad. I enjoy the occasional video game, I like spending money and I like ice cream as much as the next person, but it is the personal effect that the use has that I deem addiction. My definition of addiction is using something to the point where you are personally no longer happy with your use, whether you are aware of the effect or not. As an example, my mom is always stressed about money, yet can't seem to control her spending when it is obvious to me what she needs to do.
And other more subtle things can be addicting. I have 2 friends specifically who still combust and smoke spliff bowls. And while they roll spliffs and get their nicotine and weed fill, one friend cannot stand being away from his bong at home without having noticeable effects on his mood, while the other seems completely unphased. If he was unhappy with his use he could stop cold turkey any day and that would be that.
My experience has shown that the source of addiction is mainly mental. We begin to perceive the thing we are addicted to in an unrealistic almost delusional view. When I was a high schooler I gamed maybe 3 or 4 hours a day. At the time my parents would tell me that I should play less and that if I did I would thank them later. I was truly convinced they were wrong. I thought that my gaming was a worthwhIle use of my time, that I would never regret it and mainly that I didn't know what else I would do with my time. Now looking back they were so right. The reason I couldn't find anything else to do was because I never invested time in finding other things to do. All that time I could have been advancing my education or pursuing biking further which is now one of my biggest hobbies. I literally don't play video games ay all anymore(not even Pokémon go haha).
But on the flip side of this argument is that things by themselves are not inherently mentally addicting. The best argument I've heard for this is imagine a group of people who are given heroin every day for 3 weeks, then immediately not given it. You would imagine a large portion of the group would have withdrawal symptoms and find themselves craving more. On the other hand if all of those same people were given morphine for the same 3 weeks in a hospital, we would more than likely expect them to be just fine, if anything just needing a couple days to recover. And therein lies the difference to me. It is the perception that leads to the addiction. The heroin is seen as a drug that makes you feel good, and when removed you are craving that high. But when given medicinally, it helps with pain and you must just recover from its effects. The idea that a substance makes you feel good and that the absence of it is no longer enough is what leads to addiction in my mind. That your body recovering from exposure to the substance is not a recovery, but it is your mind telling you that normalcy is no longer enough after experiencing what life is like with the substance.
I'd like to end my long rambling by saying that I in no way think that anyone in any way is addicted to anything unless they think they are. It doesn't matter if you vape 1 gram every year or if you shoot heroin every day for 10 years. The ability to step back from your use, logically and critically understand the effects it has on your life and be able to have the control you feel you need over the substance are what I believe are important to leading a healthy and happy life, which it seems we are all pursuing.
Sorry if this entire post makes very little sense. More than anything I wanted to start a discussion to see how others view addiction. I believe as a community of fairly well educated people who are mostly daily users of a psychoactive substance this is more than likely the community with the best personal experience of addiction and how it has effected our own lives and the lives of those around us.