5 Special Interest Groups That Help Keep Marijuana Illegal

Vicki

Herbal Alchemist
http://www.alternet.org/story/15526...ana_illegal?akid=8722.222942.wH375F&rd=1&t=32
5 Special Interest Groups That Help Keep Marijuana Illegal

Editor's note: This story first appeared on Republic Report.

Last year, over 850,000 people in America were arrested for marijuana-related crimes.

Despite public opinion, the medical community, and human rightsexperts all moving in favor of relaxing marijuana prohibition laws, little has changed in terms of policy.

There have been many great books and articles detailing the history of the drug war. Part of America’s fixation with keeping the leafy green plant illegal is rooted in cultural and political clashes from the past.

However, we at Republic Report think it’s worth showing that there are entrenched interest groups that are spending large sums of money to keep our broken drug laws on the books:

1.) Police Unions: Police departments across the country have become dependent on federal drug war grants to finance their budget. In March, we published a story revealing that a police union lobbyist in California coordinated the effort to defeat Prop 19, a ballot measure in 2010 to legalize marijuana, while helping his police department clients collect tens of millions in federal marijuana-eradication grants. And it’s not just in California. Federal lobbying disclosures show that other police union lobbyists have pushed for stiffer penalties for marijuana-related crimes nationwide.

2.) Private Prisons Corporations: Private prison corporations make millions by incarcerating people who have been imprisoned for drug crimes, including marijuana. As Republic Report’s Matt Stoller noted last year, Corrections Corporation of America, one of the largest for-profit prison companies, revealed in a regulatory filing that continuing the drug war is part in parcel to their business strategy. Prison companies have spent millions bankrolling pro-drug war politicians and have used secretive front groups, like the American Legislative Exchange Council, to pass harsh sentencing requirements for drug crimes.

3.) Alcohol and Beer Companies: Fearing competition for the dollars Americans spend on leisure, alcohol and tobacco interests have lobbied to keep marijuana out of reach. For instance, the California Beer & Beverage Distributors contributed campaign contributions to a committee set up to prevent marijuana from being legalized and taxed.

4.) Pharmaceutical Corporations: Like the sin industries listed above, pharmaceutical interests would like to keep marijuana illegal so American don’t have the option of cheap medical alternatives to their products. Howard Wooldridge, a retired police officer who now lobbies the government to relax marijuana prohibition laws, told Republic Report that next to police unions, the “second biggest opponent on Capitol Hill is big PhRMA” because marijuana can replace “everything from Advil to Vicodin and other expensive pills.”

5.) Prison Guard Unions: Prison guard unions have a vested interest in keeping people behind bars just like for-profit prison companies. In 2008, the California Correctional Peace Officers Association spent a whopping $1 million to defeat a measure that would have “reduced sentences and parole times for nonviolent drug offenders while emphasizing drug treatment over prison.”
 
Vicki,
  • Like
Reactions: turk

Tea Party

Boro Connoisseur
Like the sin industries listed above, pharmaceutical interests

So tobacco & alcohol are evil while marijuana was sent by the grace of god? Yeah those pharma companies that have to spend tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars doing testing while they only have exlcusive rights for a 20 year patent period are soooo terrible.
 
Tea Party,
So tobacco & alcohol are evil while marijuana was sent by the grace of god? Yeah those pharma companies that have to spend tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars doing testing while they only have exlcusive rights for a 20 year patent period are soooo terrible.

So big pharma isn't terrible just because they spend a lot of money?
 
OKcomputer,

Tea Party

Boro Connoisseur
They invest a large amount of capital up front to develop products that make lives better.
 
Tea Party,

Vicki

Herbal Alchemist
They invest a large amount of capital up front to develop products that make lives better.

Oh please!! :lol: They also make up conditions that need treated. Sometimes they do what Abbott did, and they just had to pay a HUGE settlement. They advised nursing homes that Depakote (a seizure drug) would treat ALZ and its symptoms, JUST SO THEY COULD MAKE PROFITS. They LIED to line their pockets, like they ALWAYS do! They also lobby to keep cannabis illegal. You need to be more informed, dude. Pharmaceutical companies are all about PROFIT, period. They don't really care about helping anyone, really.
 
Vicki,
  • Like
Reactions: turk

jahi

http://globalcannabismarch.com/WE_CAN_DO_THIS_.htm
hi vicki, also saw interesting doc http://www.garynull.com/home/death-by-medicine-documentary-wins-best-of-fest-award.html death by medicine its also a paper on net by gary null & others as well as a new documentary you may like that says death by medicine (deaths related to hopistals & doctor care prescriptions & such are the number 1 killer about a million deaths a yr iatrogenic illness caused deaths.

Heard on gary's show recently that vioxx has killed not the 60,000 that been publicly admitted actually up to 500,000 people have died from it yet no one has been held accountable :(
 
jahi,
  • Like
Reactions: Vicki

Vicki

Herbal Alchemist
hi vicki, also saw interesting doc http://www.garynull.com/home/death-by-medicine-documentary-wins-best-of-fest-award.html death by medicine its also a paper on net by gary null & others as well as a new documentary you may like that says death by medicine (deaths related to hopistals & doctor care prescriptions & such are the number 1 killer about a million deaths a yr iatrogenic illness caused deaths.

Heard on gary's show recently that vioxx has killed not the 60,000 that been publicly admitted actually up to 500,000 people have died from it yet no one has been held accountable :(

I know, it's sad! They just get away with killing people. Although, they do sometimes end up having to pay out huge settlements.
 
Vicki,

jahi

http://globalcannabismarch.com/WE_CAN_DO_THIS_.htm
jahi,
  • Like
Reactions: Vicki

lwien

Well-Known Member
Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater, guys. While I agree that the big Pharma are profit orientated companies, I also believe that if it weren't for them, our life expectancies would be MUCH lower than they currently are. They are a double edged sword, as most things are.

Personally, I think a MUCH bigger problem is our lobbying laws, which has been totally out of whack for a very long time. As long as large companies can legally line the pockets of our politicians, they will have free reign to do just about anything they want to do.
 

Vicki

Herbal Alchemist
Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater, guys. While I agree that the big Pharma are profit orientated companies, I also believe that if it weren't for them, our life expectancies would be MUCH lower than they currently are. They are a double edged sword, as most things are.

Personally, I think a MUCH bigger problem is our lobbying laws, which has been totally out of whack for a very long time. As long as large companies can legally line the pockets of our politicians, they will have free reign to do just about anything they want to do.

I know what you mean. Abbott also supplies my Synthroid. I still dislike them, though.
 
Vicki,

jahi

http://globalcannabismarch.com/WE_CAN_DO_THIS_.htm
GRAPHICAL EVIDENCE SHOWS VACCINES DIDN'T SAVE US

http://www.vaclib.org/sites/debate/web1.html

The above graphs, based on the official death numbers as recorded in the Official Year Books of the Commonwealth of Australia, are taken from Greg Beattie's excellent book "Vaccination A Parent's Dilemma" and represent the decline in death rates from infectious disease in Australia. They clearly show that vaccines had nothing to do with the decline in death rates. (Note: Graphical evidence on the decline in death rates from infectious disease for USA, England, New Zealand and many other countries shows the exact same scenario as above).

So what were the true reasons for this decline? From his book 'Health and Healing' Dr Andrew Weil best answers it with this statement;

"Scientific medicine has taken credit it does not deserve for some advances in health. Most people believe that victory over the infectious diseases of the last century came with the invention of immunisations. In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc, were in decline before vaccines for them became available - the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water."

Further Reading
Vaccines and Disease
Vaccination - Assault on the Species
The Polio Vaccine Myth
I thought this may be a good place for this? & medicine pharma or emergency in a accident can save life & limb & yes lobbying is corrupt & lies fraud corruption is rife & risking life in all big $ industries http://nukefree.org/
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html
http://www.garynull.com/home/death-by-medicine-documentary-wins-best-of-fest-award.html & http://fukushimaupdate.com/
http://www.vaclib.org/sites/debate/web2.html
HISTORICAL FACTS EXPOSING THE DANGERS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINES
- In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. ( The Hadwen Documents)

- In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. (Don't Get Stuck, Hannah Allen)

- In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children had been injected with these vaccines. (Med Jnl of Australia 17/3/1973 p555)

- In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organisation after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. (Dr H Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, March 1990)

- In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. (Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK)

- In the 1970's a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. (The Lancet 12/1/80 p73)

- In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 "Abstracts" )

- In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. (The People's Doctor, Dr R Mendelsohn)

- In 1979, Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine due to its ineffectiveness. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times! (BMJ 283:696-697, 1981)

-The February 1981 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 90% of obstetricians and 66% of pediatricians refused to take the rubella vaccine.

- In the USA, the cost of a single DPT shot had risen from 11 cents in 1982 to $11.40 in 1987. The manufacturers of the vaccine were putting aside $8 per shot to cover legal costs and damages they were paying out to parents of brain damaged children and children who died after vaccination. (The Vine, Issue 7, January 1994, Nambour, Qld)

- In Oman between 1988 and 1989, a polio outbreak occurred amongst thousands of fully vaccinated children. The region with the highest attack rate had the highest vaccine coverage. The region with the lowest attack rate had the lowest vaccine coverage. (The Lancet, 21/9/91)

- In 1990, a UK survey involving 598 doctors revealed that over 50% of them refused to have the Hepatitis B vaccine despite belonging to the high risk group urged to be vaccinated. (British Med Jnl, 27/1/1990)

- In 1990, the Journal of the American Medical Association had an article on measles which stated " Although more than 95% of school-aged children in the US are vaccinated against measles, large measles outbreaks continue to occur in schools and most cases in this setting occur among previously vaccinated children." (JAMA, 21/11/90)

- In the USA, from July 1990 to November 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration counted a total of 54,072 adverse reactions following vaccination. The FDA admitted that this number represented only 10% of the real total, because most doctors were refusing to report vaccine injuries. In other words, adverse reactions for this period exceeded half a million! (National Vaccine Information Centre, March 2, 1994)

- In the New England Journal of Medicine July 1994 issue a study found that over 80% of children under 5 years of age who had contracted whooping cough had been fully vaccinated.

- On November 2nd, 2000, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) announced that its members voted at their 57th annual meeting in St Louis to pass a resolution calling for an end to mandatory childhood vaccines. The resolution passed without a single "no" vote. (Report by Michael Devitt)



yup you right vicki i have to search for it yet its all big $ keeping truth hidden & medical herbs illegal
 
jahi,

Vicki

Herbal Alchemist
I actually think there is a thread specifically dedicated to the subject of vaccines.
 
Vicki,

Elluzion

Vapeosaurus Rex
So these are the 5 main reasons, my question is how as level headed spiritual beings do we change this madness?
 
Elluzion,
  • Like
Reactions: Vicki

turk

turk
...well, I don't consider myself a "spiritual being"...I'm a pragmatist/existentialist/atheist...and it will change (like anything else) when people have had enough...and demand change...just like the anti-war movement/civil rights movement/marriage equality movement or any other movement....things happen because people facilitate an environment that DEMANDS change...until that happens we are all "just whistling dixie"....
 
turk,

turk

turk
...as long as we continue to look at the millionaires of these two parties to change things for us...we will get exactly what we deserve, and what we've been getting for all the years I've been on the planet....zilch, nothing, nada....but a bunch of "reasons" why not...
 
turk,

jahi

http://globalcannabismarch.com/WE_CAN_DO_THIS_.htm
truman was a hi-level mason who killed lots by atomic bomb http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl.php COMMISSIONS AND COVERUP

Two and only two courts of law have decided the issue of whether FDR and Washington or the commanders in Hawaii were responsible for the Pearl Harbor disaster. Both the Navy Court and the Army Board found Washington guilty (in 1944).
NAVY Court of Inquiry
!!!Top Secret ARMY Board Report!
FDR claimed Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack. It wasn't. The United States saw war with Japan as the means to get into war with Germany, which Americans opposed. So Roosevelt needed Japan to appear to strike first. Following an 8-step plan devised by the Office of Naval Intelligence, Roosevelt intentionally provoked Japan into the attack. Contrary to the official story, the fleet did not maintain radio silence, but sent messages intercepted and decoded by US intercept stations. Tricked by the lie of a surprise attack, Americans marched off to war. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/lieofthecentury.php

Billionaires for Bush is a grassroots network of corporate lobbyists, decadent heiresses,
Halliburton executives, and other winners under George W. Bush's economic policies. http://www.billionairesforbush.com/ http://bushstole04.com/
 
jahi,

jahi

http://globalcannabismarch.com/WE_CAN_DO_THIS_.htm
Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater, guys. While I agree that the big Pharma are profit orientated companies, I also believe that if it weren't for them, our life expectancies would be MUCH lower than they currently are. They are a double edged sword, as most things are.

Personally, I think a MUCH bigger problem is our lobbying laws, which has been totally out of whack for a very long time. As long as large companies can legally line the pockets of our politicians, they will have free reign to do just about anything they want to do.
hi lwien, what can we do? wall street, big banks, pharma chemical controls policy,gov; news about occupy wall st http://occupystream.com/ is kindly given by the .01% as news to 99% politicians are crooked & this funny vermin supreme http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/280...preme-president-free-ponies-zombie-energy.htm kinda gets message out?
 
jahi,

lwien

Well-Known Member
jahi, I don't know if there's anything we CAN do. ALL governments are corrupt, some more than others, and our corruption (I view lobbying as just another form of corruption), is right up there with the best of them being that there are 23 countries considered less corrupt than us. Out of 182 countries, we are ranked 24th but that doesn't include lobbying. If it did, one has to wonder how many places we would drop. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index

As long as our society views money and power as a priority, things will not change and I don't see how any of us can affect any kind of change in regards to those priorities. I realize that this is a defeatist attitude, but until someone can come up with an idea that makes any kind of sense, unfortunately, it is what it is.

I guess we can take solace that there are 158 countries that are considered more corrupt that us.
 
lwien,
  • Like
Reactions: Vicki

jahi

http://globalcannabismarch.com/WE_CAN_DO_THIS_.htm
its kinda ez to be a couch activist & sign e-petition http://news.change.org/stories/want-some-deforestation-with-that-girl-scout-cookie
few years back, Madison Vorva and Rhiannon Tomtishen were doing research to earn Girl Scout Bronze Awards. The two scouts had decided to research endangered orangutans and found that a major cause of the creatures' demise was habitat loss from palm oil plantations. You can imagine the girls' dismay, then, when they found out that Girl Scout cookies are chock full of palm oil.

Rather than continue to hawk habitat-destroying desserts, the girls, now 15 years old, are campaigning to get the destructive palm oil out of Girl Scout cookies. The teens are taking on this campaign with a little help from Rainforest Action Network and Change.org.

Palm oil plantations are often produced by clear-cutting rainforest and peatlands in Southeast Asia. Not only does this deforestation destroy the habitat of orangutans, Sumatran tigers, and other endangered species, it also leads to conflicts between animals and people. "We've seen pictures of orangutans set afire and beaten," Vorva told the Ann Arbor News. "You really just want to reach out and do all that you can to help save them."

Palm oil production is also terrible for the environment. Deforestation is the source of about 20 percent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, and because peatlands act as carbon sinks, destroying them releases huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

After learning that the very cookies they were selling were contributing to these serious, global problems, Madison and Rhiannon wrote to Girl Scouts USA, but got nowhere. So they started Project ORANGS (Orangutans Really Need and Appreciate Girl Scouts) and enlisted the help of the Union of Concerned Scientists, the Center for Biological Diversity, Cultural Survival, Orangutan Foundation International, and Rainforest Action Network to get the Girl Scouts to pull unsustainable palm oil from all of their cookies. Girl Scouts USA still refuses to listen.

One would think that with a mission to build "girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place," the Girl Scouts USA would applaud Madison and Rhiannon in their effort to address a serious issue and create some positive change. Instead, the two young activists have been largely ignored.

You, however, can help the girls' out. Sign Rainforest Action Network's petition to Kathy Cloninger, the CEO of Girl Scouts USA, and tell her that destructive palm oil has no place in Girl Scout cookies.
http://occupystream.com/
 
jahi,
Top Bottom