Even if you add rolling eyes and for me it doesn't make it better. It's not a matter of opinion. If somebody ask you to compare the hopper with the crafty, you can't say the hopper is a one-hitter and the crafty is a session vape. The GH is not particularly a one-hitter. It CAN be a one...
What do you mean by one-hitter? For me a one hitter, is one hit. One dense hit and that's it, your bowl is spent.
As any vaporizer if you put your hopper at a low enough temp 3-4, you can have many tokes from the same bowl. It's only a one hitter if you want it to be by using higher temps...
It doesn't mean anything. I can put old vaped herb from the nano in the nano and still get a lot of vapor out of it. You just need to bump up the temp.
It's true there's no magic in vaporization, we've seen it in a vaporizer study recently (Volcano, Solo, Plenty, DaVinci, Butane). In table 2, we can see at about 98%(IIRC, or 96%) successfully evaporate the cannabinoids in the herb (at specified temp in the study and beside the Butane vape)...
Does anybody know if you can cycle through the presets temperature without the app (when you want to temp step your bowl)? Is there a button on the Firefly to cycle through the preset temperature levels?
EDIT: The user manual is available on the website. There's no cycle button on the device...
Very nice! Can't you place the stem (without screen if possible) on the Underdog as usual. Put down the thermometer head down the stem up to where the herb should be. Then take draw normally through the stem (the wire will be a little annoyance but I think it's possible to have a tight seal...
At a certain point nothing is harmless. The air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat (pesticides in vegetables, hormones in animals, chemicals in water, etc).
There's was also this study analyzing the content of the vapor. Although only high density vapor were analyzed as said in the conclusion.
Cal NORML/MAPS Study Shows Vaporizer Can Drastically Reduce Toxins in Marijuana Smoke...
Good question. IMO, it all comes down to what is in the vapor.
Your premise is wrong. You assume anything that can gunk up a vaporizer is necessarily bad for the body. But that's not the case. We often use cream, massage oil and other stuff which could gunk up any vaporizer but are good for...
Yes, from what I understand conduction vapes prefer to be lightly tapped down. So stirring could be counter-productive or not... I would also like to know the effect of the relatively long vapor path. Does it produce cooler vapor at high temp than other vaporizers?
That's basically my experience. At 4 it's a bit low for me. At 5, it works but not a lot of vapor. At 5.5, you get denser vapor, flavor and extended session up to 6.2/6.3. At those range the first few tokes are the most flavorful but even the end of bowls taste relatively pretty good (still...
Personally, I wouldn't shell out over 300$ for any vaporizer, it's just a specialized heater after all. But the new firefly provides more than marginal benefit over the firefly 1 since it has temperature control. It will probably completely change how you use the Firefly. Firefly 1 was more...
If this is true then this is a full convection vaporizer.
True test of convection.
1 - Put your herb in
2 - Start the vaporizer without drawing for many minutes (lets say 10 minutes).
3 - Observe if your herb is vaporized (usually by a change of color)
Your herb must be totally green as if it...