Search results

the worst film i have ever seen.

or have it screw or pop onto the bottom of the teflon mouthpiece. (the crucible is upside down)

did it again, this time much more functional when trying to do things, much less when not. i love it!

so should over-eating.

go slow, you can get nice thin bags for quite some time if you really go slow with it.

i did some for the first time last night and it was not a head high at all. i was sober, yet my body was pleasantly disconnected.

i still don't see why you're discrediting the study. it's throwing me off, are you just afraid that your sacred herb might not be so side-effect free?

Welcome bookworm, readers are great people, and usually remain smart into their later years. btw, is there any particular reason you choose to identify yourself as a democrat.

just did reclaimed oil, or RO from the herbie in my glass pipet for the first time. (i.e. wandhash equivalent) it comes on really slow, i can concentrate and focus really well, i seem very conscious and normal, but my actions are slightly uncoordinated. really body stoneish, but your mind is...

i always start at 325 and work up to at least 360. i have started it at 400 in the past and that was a bad choice, it doesn't burn, but the vapor condensate it produces is as harsh as smoking. i don't recommend starting above 325. work your way up slowly, take it easy on your lungs, just...

125 in the state surely leaves many patients out of range to where they can grow their own supply legally no? what are co-op laws like in AZ?

pappy, if you weren't getting defensive, you'd realize that he's doing a service for you. this is the kind of research that cannabis users have been hoping to see for years, ones that objectively look for possible health-related side effects. this may turn out to be very beneficial to cannabis...

only self imposed. i've been a member of video game related forums that used the same base as this one. it had a side-game system to the forum and was pretty badass. so if the admins wanted to commit the time, there's no limit to what they could add.

if you give them that argument, they will show you a statistic about tobacco use, something we know kills many every year, yet many continue to do. they will then say "we need to protect the public" i will say when it comes to drugs "let the public protect itself"

what about substaces that would be highly valuable to any terrorist organization?

you can get herbalaires for around 160-170 shipped on ebay. you're looking at around 25$ more. and it comes with a 3 year warranty. right now i'm really interested in the vapolamp though.

thanks for at least trying to convince me. but i'm still not convinced.

obviously $$$ isn't the only thing that people care about, otherwise we would not have the food regulations you talk about. people care about any number of things, for instance i care about the prohibition of any substance that does not pose an immediate risk to a large portion of a population...

your point? there's no evidence that JWH-018 causes cancer, just because a compound contains another compound doesn't mean anything.

by what mechanism does this happen? I personally don't place any faith in the mercola or relfe sources, they both come from the loosest areas in science, and i found little if any substantiatable facts stated by either source. what would really convince me is a peer reviewed article published...