Smoking vs. vaporizing

Smoking vs. vaporizing

I wrote this essay for Vape World. They have generously contributed it to the FC Resource library.


Many organic substances and blends contain desirable components that we traditionally ingest by smoking, i.e. burning the material and breathing in the mix of gases. While we know that the desired compounds are present, we also know that organic combustion always produces some compounds that we'd rather do without, some of which are even classed as carcinogens.

Smoking uses the type of combustion called smoldering (technically, oxidative pyrolysis). The important point about smoldering is that it is incomplete combustion, therefore it yields a lot more toxic products than actual flame. Exactly what is produced depends on the material that is smoldering, but certain toxins are common to all organic combustion.

Due to the extreme high temperatures, there are a wide variety of both organic and inorganic compounds produced when smoking plant material. The exact composition of smoke depends on the nature of the burning substance and the conditions of combustion, but it is always a mixture of microscopic particles mixed with a gaseous-vapor phase.

The gaseous-vapor phase contains many of the smaller, more volatile compounds, such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, nitrosamines, acrolein, benzene, and toluene, among numerous others.

The particulate phase contains particles of various sizes. The smallest size aerosols contain the semi-volatile compounds like phenols, cresols, and naphthalenes. The relatively larger particles have the heaviest, non-volatiles deposited on them: polyaromatic hydrocarbons such as benz(a)anthracene and benzo(a)pyrene.

One class of smoke by-products, called asphyxiants, prevents oxygen uptake. Some of these asphyxiants, such as carbon dioxide, just displace oxygen. Carbon monoxide, however, interacts with your blood and reduces its ability to carry oxygen—and it's the most commonly produced asphyxiant! Both CO2 and CO are produced when you smoke.

Another class is called irritants. Smoked plant material produces acrolein, a highly potent irritant that severely affects the lungs, throat, nasal passages, and eyes. Combustion also produces another powerful irritant, formaldehyde, as well as particulate matter and tars that cause irritation.

Smoldering organic material has a pungent sharp odor that lingers. Smell and taste are closely linked, so smoke always has a charred taste that competes with and often overpowers the natural flavor. There's yet another problem: the heat of combustion is so high that it can destroy (pyrolyze) or diminish (chemically alter) components. Still, people tolerate the numerous negative aspects in order to benefit from the desirable components that are released.

Clearly, all of these problems can be avoided if we just heat the material to the point where the desirable components are released but not destroyed, and the material itself doesn't ignite. That is exactly what a vaporizer does.

The idea is to release only the vapor of the target component, which is usually found in the plant resins. In smoke, the desired component is diluted and mixed with particulates, tars, and toxic gases. Vapor, on the other hand, is much purer. The exact components released at the vaporization temperature depend on the material, but none of the toxic products of organic combustion will be present, so vapor contains a much higher percentage of the desired component than smoke does.

Vapor has a slight odor but it doesn't cling or linger for nearly as long as smoke. It certainly doesn't smell like burning. Vapor delivers full flavor. Because a large percentage of your material is no longer destroyed or floating away in smoke, vaporizing lets you get the most out of your material. One more potential benefit: a vaporizer with a variable temperature control lets you target components that vaporize at different temperatures. My article on Temperature controlled vaporizing explains why you would do this and how to approach it.

If you are still subjecting yourself to the hazards of smoke, you owe it to yourself to try the switch to vaporizing. Vaporizers have become widespread and affordable, and there's a wide selection of home and portable units. Once you've made your choice, see my article on switching from smoking to vaporizing for tips on how to make a successful transition.
First release
Last update
5.00 star(s) 8 ratings

More resources from pakalolo

Share this resource

Latest reviews

A thorough and simple explanation. I appreciate it! Now when people ask why "F*ck Combustion?"—I can slang 'em a bag of big ol' facts and hit them with an exceptionally well-written explanation in response ✌️
Very well written! Vaping taste way more agreeable than smoking.
I wish I was a early adopter of this healthy way to dose with an effective medicine like CANNABIS! You are the cat’s meow!
Vaping is safer than most thing’s we put in our frame’s!
Exactly the information I was looking for in a concise yet well explained manner. This was written in such a well thought out way that I have began sharing this article with friends and family that are wanting more knowledge on the subject. Thank you
In a way, this article is a bunch of highly relevant info that I wish I was able to explain this simply and on point to people I meet who are curious about vaporization. Now I can just give them the link.
Great read for a beginner to a well seasoned vaporist. The structure was easy to follow as well. I'll defiantly be using this as a reference in the usual combustion vs vaping arguments I get into with friends. Great article pak.
Excellent overview, thorough and well-written. I think most would find it shocking just how much undesirable crap is in cannabis smoke; I know I did! I think that, for many, this would be sufficient to make the case for quitting combustion and switching to vaporization.
This is a good, thorough essay detailing the benefits of vaporizing as opposed to smoking. There's a lot of information here, and it's easy to understand, yet not lacking in technical details. I think every cannabis enthusiast should read this!
Nice primer! I like how you covered the basics and also provided a more technical look at what happens during the processes. I'm guessing that you consulted a respected chemist while writing this. Thanks for the science lesson. :)
Thanks for the review. I did, in fact, ask a noted air scientist for a technical review before I sent the article to VapeWorld.
Top Bottom