Hello Dejan, have you considered changing the AFC so that it has distinct clicks that allow the mouthpiece to stay in the intended position instead of being easily swiveled out of place?That's what I would do, although this has been done by us with a longer sequence.
Question about the AFC marking and making the position more visible. We are down to 2 options, one is a small machined pointer and the other a fiber laser polymerized dot. The dot would be almost pure white and have good contrast against the black. I believe both should suffice.
Is the dot on the pointer an option?That's what I would do, although this has been done by us with a longer sequence.
Question about the AFC marking and making the position more visible. We are down to 2 options, one is a small machined pointer and the other a fiber laser polymerized dot. The dot would be almost pure white and have good contrast against the black. I believe both should suffice.
I experienced the same uniform AVB in a TM capsule. I maybe got 2-3 good hits, but the first was weak at a lower temp (maybe 350F/177C) in session mode. Switched to demand and pushed to 440F (227C) and crushed it. I will pay more attention and try lower temps next time. How low/high are you all going?
Dont get me wrong its a good vaporizer but the way people were raving about it and comparisments to other vapes I was expecting a bit more.
Interesting, why is the initial heat up time difference of a few seconds important?While I'm waiting for mine to show up Monday (tracking estimates that but it hasn't shown it's moved in 5 days after it went from New Jersey to Pennsylvania) I was trying to look at extra battery options and the EVE 50PL is a newer tabless high discharge (125A continuous) 21700 that seems to outperform the P50b and be much cooler in use.
Battery Mooch posted a free test chart on Patreon that included the 50PL and the P50b
Does anyone with their Frolic already have a 50PL to try and, if so, any feedback on performance and battery life compared to the P50b it came with?
I don't honestly know enough about whether or not the different battery could affect performance but it seems like the higher output could be capable of shaving time off the 8 second heat up to bring it closer to the 5 seconds the TM2 has which people have noted they can clearly tell the difference.
Yes, been doing this for years, the laser changes the structure of the plastic, there is no removing this thing. The same was done with the PEEK CU only with a different frequency.While I think the laser polymerized dot is (), I think it looks better. On the other hand, the machined pointer might make it easier/possible to check the setting without looking. Might even be possible to *change* the setting without looking. Question is: how important is that? In my slight preference for the white dot, I am assuming that laser polymerizing would make sure that the dot stays visible forever.
Ssssshhhhh, you will upset the voices!Hello Dejan, have you considered changing the AFC so that it has distinct clicks that allow the mouthpiece to stay in the intended position instead of being easily swiveled out of place?
Is the dot on the pointer an option?
O-ring spare setThe white dot looks better.
And mine is shipped, very fast actions
I hope we get the official capsules soon. Or some kind of bowl reducer, and maybe a filling tool.
Good point.The pointer would help moving/tuning it maybe ?
This was the idea with the tolerances but yes, depends on lubing and how perpendicular to the mod you are holding the tip, etc.White dot looks better, but the pointer is better for verifying in the dark. For the concerns of the AFC moving, I noticed that too. My recommendation is a thicker oring or less lubrication there so that it's much harder to turn and stays in place by friction.
I wonder if this might be related to your complaints, @Orvaxxx , and I wanted to add to and answer @Numerous_Nothing . While I was getting fantastic flavor and vapor at 422F, I noticed that I was missing the effects of full extraction. I can tell when a device isn't fully extracting or getting hot enough, because I tend to feel awful.
While temperature readings vary wildly between different models, 422F seemed on the higher end and I didn't want to combust. Finally I bit the bullet and cranked the frolic up to 455F, and it started giving the wonderful full extraction I was looking for. There is no hot spotting or black bits at this temp, and I bet I could go higher without issue.
Since I'm always taking an on demand rip from a fully cold frolic, it's possible I need a lot higher heat setting to bring things into the goldilocks zone before I'm done with my draw.
In short;
![]()
I think we are all disappointed in your review. LOLDont get me wrong its a good vaporizer but the way people were raving about it and comparisments to other vapes I was expecting a bit more.
I didn’t make a review and you’re right it’s a me thing.I think we are all disappointed in your review. LOL
I'll give a specific reason though. This is a you problem. You got your hopes up, and the vape having no idea how big your hopes were, didn't live up to your hopes. I don't even own one, so I have no skin in the game, but am very into logic. So I felt the need to point it out. Your first mention that you were disappointed with zero explanation almost makes it seem like you want people not to buy the vape. So strange.
I tend to get my hopes up as well, but I don't publicly admonish anything for not living up to my expectations. Only if a company makes false claims is it there fault.
I've never seen a vape so nitpicked at as this one. I'm sure it has a lot to do with a certain vape by another company very much upsetting people, so we all have our "scam radar" at high alert. Dejan has been more attentive to this community than I've ever seen. Writing vague, negative reviews of it seems very unfair after all the work he's done to take our opinions into mind and put some of those into action.
But even if he hadn't, vague or flippant reviews don't help anyone. It is important for us to know if there is anything bad about the vape, but not living up to one person's overblown (and unlisted) expectations and VAS, isn't a valid reason for concern.
I saw your post, thought "hey, I ordered 3 hours before Drsoapp" and went to check my mail. Bingo, mine is also on the way (EU warehouse). Can't wait ...And mine is shipped,
Interesting, why is the initial heat up time difference of a few seconds important?
This initial heat up time is not related to the mass or power of the heater but rather to the oven mass which helps bring down the heat up times in demand mode in use actually. The power of the heater is not capped by the power of the battery. The temp difference might tire out the 50B faster in a battery pack but this is negligible in our configuration. But can't hurt to test, although this can only be tested over time...
Maybe because it's a discussion forum and we try to discuss together. You cant just tell a friend " I don't really like my new car" and add nothing without making him curious. Especially if he ordered the same car.I didn’t make a review and you’re right it’s a me thing.
But why would I have to be specific on what I don’t like, I am not a vape reviewer just a vape enthusiast.
I'd be interested if there are advantages to the 50PLWhile I'm waiting for mine to show up Monday (tracking estimates that but it hasn't shown it's moved in 5 days after it went from New Jersey to Pennsylvania) I was trying to look at extra battery options and the EVE 50PL is a newer tabless high discharge (125A continuous) 21700 that seems to outperform the P50b and be much cooler in use.
Battery Mooch posted a free test chart on Patreon that included the 50PL and the P50b
Does anyone with their Frolic already have a 50PL to try and, if so, any feedback on performance and battery life compared to the P50b it came with?
I'm not sure what you're saying here. The "longest" heat times I'm seeing from cold are 5sec. Subsequent hits are <2sec.I don't honestly know enough about whether or not the different battery could affect performance but it seems like the higher output could be capable of shaving time off the 8 second heat up to bring it closer to the 5 seconds the TM2 has which people have noted they can clearly tell the difference.
Battery safety precautions must be followed! Please remove the batteries after every use! Do not store the batteries in the unit while unattended.
Dot for me.That's what I would do, although this has been done by us with a longer sequence.
Question about the AFC marking and making the position more visible. We are down to 2 options, one is a small machined pointer and the other a fiber laser polymerized dot. The dot would be almost pure white and have good contrast against the black. I believe both should suffice.
Haven't checked again, but haven't seen that before. I did see it on vgoodiez' site though. Didn't check whether they have it with every battery powered vape. Pretty sure such a warning wouldn't be limited to the Frolic *and seems like standard liability thing thoughA guy on Reddit claims that the Frolic product page has this weird warning: