Wand design engineering

[Rebus Canebus]

Understanding that there are always trade-offs. Is there any general consensus on which manufacturer makes the best engineered vapor wand in the whip segment? IE: ease of loading, ease of cleaning / screen access, plus durability. As an example, I just purchased a DBV to pass the time while waiting for the PD. The DB has a relatively simple design, other makers have what appear to be more sophisticated two piece designs. are the 2 piece chambers an improvement over single piece design? I suppose KISS and IWDFWI do apply.

Edit: I guess what I'm asking is does any maker have a distinct advantage, gained by playing with things like air diffusers and chamber shape and size to lessen or eliminate stirring. While at the same time making loading / unloading and cleaning easier via 2 piece.

 

[max]

The DBV and SSV wands are called 'quick change' wands. Supposed to be easier to change the screen. I can verify the standard SSV's screen changing is a lot easier than on some others. The DBV isn't as easy. The bowl is narrower. I'd rather have the simple 7th Floor wand than a two piece. The glass is high quality and I just don't like messing with two sections. If you're interested in a two piece design, I'd check with Vaporstore.

 

[Rebus Canebus]

The DBV and SSV wands are called 'quick change' wands. Supposed to be easier to change the screen. I can verify the standard SSV's screen changing is a lot easier than on some others. The DBV isn't as easy. The bowl is narrower. I'd rather have the simple 7th Floor wand than a two piece. The glass is high quality and I just don't like messing with two sections. If you're interested in a two piece design, I'd check with Vaporstore.

Thanks Max, I'm probably just over thinking this. No need to over engineer. It's simple, durable, and it works.