so, it seems in on-demand mode, the TM2 performs better that the Frolic at low temps (below 200C)? not sure why that would be the case, but could anyone confirm this please?
I would say this is purely down to the airflow restriction on the TM2. If you close up the airflow by about 1/2 to 3/4 on the Frolic, you can acheive much better hits on lower temps using on-demand.
I am still learning how the Frolic works like Tigole said, to find the sweet spot, but its still surpassing my expectations in almost every way.
In terms of comparisons against the TB2, I havent really used the Frolic enough yet. The TB was my daily driver up until the Frolic arrived. The more open airflow and form factor of the Frolic are definitely advantages over the bowle but until I can get the Frolic dialled in perfectly, it still doesn't quite match up to the simplicity of the TB2 when it comes to loading, killing the bowl, and dumping out the spent herb.
More to come....