Cannabis tasting

SirClip

New Member
As a cannabis and cigar afficionado, my tobacco tasting routines have naturally overflowed in my vaporizing sesh. I think there is value in consensual methods that allows different subjectivity to be compared. In wine and tobacco tasting it is customary to make a tasting card or sheet where observations or perceptions are recorded at different times, while doing different things. For example, a “cold draw” can be made on an unlit cigar, just to taste the raw tobacco, which in turn can add depth to further comments on a smoking experience. With cannabis, unfortunately, this can be done only with a joint, as any device (pipe or TED – Thermal Extraction Device), unless brand new, will impose an aftertaste.

A lot can be imported from the cigar world to build a solid tasting protocol that will allow more valuable exchange of personal impressions in cannabis tasting and vaporizing sesh. First, mouth to lung (MTL). This is the basis for a more or less standardized intake method for gaseous substances. The mouth might not be exactly the same from one person to another but the proportion of its inner volume to the volume of the lungs must be quite regular. Direct to lung (DTL), in my opinion has too many inconveniences for that purpose. The first one being that you don’t really “taste” much of anything, not in a complex or subtle way. Another one is that some variability can’t be controlled: lung volume, duration of draw, etc. Lastly, DTL practices often imply one or two large draws, not enough to provide for a tasting experience that accounts for how the flavor develops within a sesh.

Second, fuck combustion. Or maybe that should’ve been first. Now that we know a lot more about cannabis, how complex it is and how refined culture techniques and genetics have evolved, the only way to realistically access what our sensory organs can make of it is through vaporizing. Certainly not mixing it with burning material. In this forum this argument is a given, and I need not labour it.

There is I think an aspect of cigar tasting can be imported directly into the realm of cannabis. In the cigar world, it is customary to divide the cigar in three thirds: the hay, the divine, the manure. During its first third, "the hay", the cigar wakes up, like in the morning, not entirely there but with hints and promises. The second third is by far the best, hence the “divine”, flavour and texture are at their maximum and most enjoyable. The last third is considered somehow as the bastardized version of the cigar, less desirable, starts to taste harsh. Some just don’t smoke it.

With the proper technique, I do find the segmentation in thirds to be useful, even if not accurate with all TEDs. Furthermore, with definite sequence of MTL, one can even find surprising differences and characteristics from one draw to another. Below is a generic example with the Dani Fusion vape with a long wood stem. The Dani Fusion has an advanced click, meaning that you will likely have to go past it to get to your ideal temperature. Some view this as a drawback, I consider it a useful feature. The click signals that the device is at specific temp and you can get quite precise just by slowly counting afterwards. I count a bit more when vaporizing kief or hash.

The sesh will have three thirds, same as a cigar. Each third will deplete the TED of its extracting power, and it will have to be re-heated twice. Any given third implies 4 series of draws of increasing MTLs: 1, 2, 3, 4. So, each sesh has 30 draws, divided in thirds of ten draws that are distributed in 4 series. After a series of draws, hold in lungs should be about 5 seconds and a complete clean breath should be taken afterwards, between each series.

So we start with a Dani Fusion endowed with a medium pack of good weed that is torch heated until the upclick (heating), and then 5 seconds more. This is the timing I found was the best, with this TED, for sustaining this sesh protocol. Ideally, with any TED, the useful heat should be depleted after 10 draws (with pauses) so that the downclick (cooling) is not too far.

“T” is for “Thirds” and “S” is for “Series”:

First Third: The Hay

T1S1 : One draw. This draw will provide the purest taste of the terpenes. At this point, the weed itself is not very hot yet and only the most volatile substances will get vaporized. It might seem that there isn’t much there, but I find there is. It is a revealing prelude to what’s to come. Upon exhale, you might not see anything coming out, but you will definitely feel a subtle taste

Exhale after the 5 seconds’ hold. Then take another clean breath. Every time between series. This will serve two purposes. First, it will give time to the TED to reheat in the right places. When you draw, you take cold air in, and it cools the metal near the wind. Heat from neighboring regions takes a little time to propagate. Second, with fresh blood in the alveolus of the lungs, you will ensure that the next series of pull leads to maximum absorption.

T1S2 : Two draws. Terpenes in full bloom. That is the time to identify and chase those ethereal flavours. You still might not see anything while exhaling, but you will definitely taste it.

T1S3 : Three draws. Terpenes again, with more of a spicy hint.

T1S4 : Four draws. At this point of the first third, there isn’t much heat left in the TED. The four pulls here will get you some flavour, but not much else. It basically serves the purpose of drying the material and preparing it for the second third.

The TED should be immediately reheated after the downclick. With the Dani Fusion used as above, the downclick usually happens right after the last four draws, or need just one or two quick blows to click. If the downclick is heard during the last four draws, do not complete the series, reheat there and then.

Second Third: The Divine

T2S1 : One draw. The vapour is much thicker and flavourful than in T1. You recognize the terpenes from the first third, but with more intensity and mixed with something more. I’m not sure if the water vapour content plays a role in the tasting here

T2S2 : Two draws. This will be the most satisfying series. I find those two successive draws, the second series of the divine, to be the most representative of the best that the weed you're sampling has to offer.

T2S3 : Three draws. This will also be a notable series. The last draw might be a tad week, but this series compares well to the one before.

T2S4 : Four draws. As in the first third, the last series is not the strongest one and serves the purpose of preparing the last third.

This second third is really “divine”, it’s the best! Usually very smooth, very tasty and very potent. Like after the first third, reheat as soon as you hear the click.

Third Third : The manure

Now, for the “manure” third. At this point, the material is dry and roasted. And like coffee, when roasted, you get a quite different flavor.

T3S1 : One draw. You will definitely notice how the vapour is different. Very dense and almost smoke-like. Also very tasty, more of a roasted flavor, but it begins to be harsh.

T3S2 : Two draws. Very dense cloud, a bit harsher. I often noticed some slight irritation at the back of the throat. I first thought it might have been due to the heat: as you reheat the TED, heat propagates to the whole device. But I don’t think that’s it. Maybe there is some kind of irritant that’s being vaporized at that stage that is more toxic or irritating.

T3S3 : Three draws. Chances are that you will still have a decent cloud, harsher, denser.

T3S4 : Four draws. Simply finishes the sesh. Still enjoyable, but the vapour is at its harshest and it seems there is not much to discover at this stage.

This last third will bring your sesh to an end and leave you to enjoy the spoils. There is a valid argument not to discount the “manure” third: cannabinoids. Many accounts place residual THC in AVB at around 25% of initial concentration. The last third might not taste that great, but it might just as well be as potent, or more potent, than the first two thirds. I don’t know.

The whole process of these 30 draws, in this manner, takes about 5 or 6 minutes. The resulting AVB will be an even deep brown colour, same colour from center to periphery. Sometimes you see on videos some AVB that is brown near the metal but much lighter, even sometimes almost greenish in the center. This uneven discoloration is not the sign of a successful use of the material in a sesh. Draws are too strong, in too rapid succession or too few.

The combination of taking your time, regularly breathing clean air in your lungs during a sesh and experiencing the soothing perceptual experience of simply vaporizing good weed makes for an unsurpassable set and setting management. It’s very doubtful that something would go wrong after that.

Further steps to elaborate a useful standard for cannabis tasting should of course consider the psycho-active effects and the way they manifest themselves. For example, the very first low impact impression of the cannabis is sometimes referred to as “saying hello” – maybe from coding, where “Hello World!” is a staple test to see if a program goes through. I have tasted some cannabis that say hello as soon as T2S4. Starting a timer right after the end of the sesh could also be useful in describing the initiation, deployment and resolution of a cannabis intake.

I found the same technique holds well for Dynavap’s Hyperdyn but, as they say in the Dynaverse, you got to respect the click. No heating further than the click. Omni, Vong or M using an armoured cap, you will only get two real “thirds”. Haven’t tried with a Vestratto TED.
 

buford

Well-Known Member
Did a human, or a so-called "AI", write this very wordy, and somewhat pointless (or, at least, "hard to discern the point of"), post?

Sure sounds like the latter. Apologies if you are actually a human prone to long, rambling, "what-was-the-point-again?" writing.
 

borbjorbis

Well-Known Member
Did a human, or a so-called "AI", write this very wordy, and somewhat pointless (or, at least, "hard to discern the point of"), post?

Sure sounds like the latter. Apologies if you are actually a human prone to long, rambling, "what-was-the-point-again?" writing.
I completely disagree that this reads like it was written by AI. It's lengthy, sure, maybe a little rambly and self-indulgent, but it's actually quite cogent. He's describing his approach to flavor chasing by borrowing a framework from the much more mainstream culture of closely and critically tasting cigars.

OP just seems to be someone who is really passionate about the particular flavor-chasing methods and experiences that most excite him, and he wanted to share his thoughts with the world. In other words, he's demonstrating the kind of humanity that a Large Language Model fundamentally cannot. Dry Herb Vaping is already a niche subject, and OP is writing about his personal niche within that niche.

If you wanna see some obvious AI stuff, go look at the postings from the user "obtainhigh," assuming they haven't been deleted already. It's important to be skeptical in the age of AI, but it's going to be even more important that we don't let that skepticism turn into a counter-productive force that gets in the way of communication.

Direct to lung (DTL), in my opinion has too many inconveniences for that purpose. The first one being that you don’t really “taste” much of anything

@SirClip –– I'm totally with you that MTL is generally better for tasting, but I also find that there are some flavors that I can only pick up on from DTL, on the exhale. And I totally share your preference for the lower-temp clicks on the Fusion 1.0. Have you ever tried inhaling a Dynavap as you're heating and using the click as an upper-bound for the temperature, rather than a lower-bound? I find you can get superb flavor from pretty much any DV tip that way.
 
Last edited:

Radwin Bodnic

Well-Known Member
Accessory Maker
Did a human, or a so-called "AI", write this very wordy, and somewhat pointless (or, at least, "hard to discern the point of"), post?
That what my first impression as well but it seems like there's more to it... maybe the writer got a little help ? Only future posts will tell.

@SirClip @borbjorbis the herbo Ti is the device in my collection that delivers the most intense and acute taste. And it's DTL only. But sure the taste reveals on the exhale.

For example, a “cold draw” can be made on an unlit cigar, just to taste the raw tobacco, which in turn can add depth to further comments on a smoking experience. With cannabis, unfortunately, this can be done only with a joint, as any device (pipe or TED – Thermal Extraction Device), unless brand new, will impose an aftertaste.
Most (glass) stem based device are easy enough to clean to get rid of any aftertaste. But even when my devices have an aftertaste I do cold draws. Especially when the vapor path is short (vapman, Vaponic...), the taste of the green material easily covers the aftertaste of the device itself.

There's also one thing I like to do : exhaling by mouth and nose. Even though the olfactory cells are saturated after the first exhale and take time to recover, I find this helps in getting a sustained perception of the whole flavor profile of your material.

I'm surprised you didn't mention the aftertaste you get from vaping (not the aftertaste of the device, the one in your mouth and olfactory tract).
If I don't RTL, I find this aftertaste mostly echoes the fruity notes for most of my current strains and it gives an other dimension to the flavor profile of said strain. For example I have a citrusy strain that taste citrus for the first third but turn to garlic and spices at the second third. Yet the aftertaste is a strong bergamot scent that lasts.

One last thing, when I'm vaping indoor and my sesh is done, if I left the room and come back a few minutes later (the time for olfactory cells to recover), I am always amazed at the remaining scent in the room. It's always pungent, complex and very heady. My favorite incense for sure...
 
Last edited:

SirClip

New Member
I use AI a lot, but not to write texts. Not good enough. I don’t even use Antidote or tools of the like. I know how to write. Also, my main language is not English, so I may sound a bit off at times.

I did not think it was off topic on this forum to have a lengthy post on a possible cannabis tasting protocol, as it can’t be adequately done in only a few sentences. In fact, I had a problem posting it. It was originally more than 12K chars, and I found out the limit on this forum is 10K chars (including white).

I readily acknowledge that I’m not a cannabis industry insider or an experienced official judge at cannabis ranking events, but I see a tremendous potential in establishing a common template for cannabis tasting, so personal impressions can be shared more accurately with users that want to grow their experience in that regard. It is far from an obligation. Nothing wrong with just enjoying a bottle of wine, a fine scotch, a good cigar or a flavory toke, without any pointy inner questionings.

But at some point, if you are really into it, you want to talk about it with others that share this inclination. So, a common language of some sort is necessary. That is the sole motivation of my original post. State the interest for it, describe the problem I’m addressing, propose elements of a solution and offer a personal glance at what can be done afterwards.

@borbjorbis: Flavors only picked up in DTL, that is interesting. I admit I’m not a frequent DTL practitioner. But just because you said that I’m certainly going to try it with that perspective in mind and compare it to what is accessible with the MTL based techniques. Could the “all in” more sustained and sudden draw of DTL imply that the substances in question do behave in different ways so as to taste differently? Quite possible. Maybe there should be a place for MTL as well as DTL in a standardized cannabis tasting card. Also: “heating and using the click as an upper-bound" : I will try that.

@Radwin Bodnic: You make very interesting points. I didn’t know about the Herborizer Ti – thank you. Up until now, I haven’t tried to make a tasting card with water involved after the vaporizing process. My thinking is to get efficient and comfortable with a “dry” tasting card before adding some complexity to it. But it is definitely something that should be incorporated or at least addressed at some point. Especially if flavour is deemed better in some fashion. Exhaling by mouth and nose: absolutely yes! I even do it going in, inhaling a bit of vapour through the nose as I breathe in MTL. First to see the colour and density of the vapour, and to have the aroma from the nose, which is always interesting. Aftertaste: of course, that is very important. I did not dwell into any specifics other than the testing protocol itself, but you are quite right. And the aftertaste in the mouth isn’t the same as the one in the olfactory tract – both are interesting.

@buford – "what-was-the-point-again?": For you? None. Obviously.
 

Radwin Bodnic

Well-Known Member
Accessory Maker
Up until now, I haven’t tried to make a tasting card with water involved after the vaporizing process. My thinking is to get efficient and comfortable with a “dry” tasting card before adding some complexity to it. But it is definitely something that should be incorporated or at least addressed at some point.
Just to clarify that. I only use the herbo dry on a Sherlock glass pipe. Easy to clean, hard bends that cools adequately without stealing aromatic compounds, borosilicate is very neutral tasting.
This exact set-up :
vaporisateur-sherlock-ti.jpg


Do you know about the Vaponic ? Another old school device... please do yourself the favor of buying one. The flavor-for-your-bucks ratio is out of the charts. And when you get one, don't use ground material. Just put a small nug in the bowl.
 

TigoleBitties

Big and Bouncy
A lot can be imported from the cigar world to build a solid tasting protocol that will allow more valuable exchange of personal impressions in cannabis tasting and vaporizing sesh. First, mouth to lung (MTL). This is the basis for a more or less standardized intake method for gaseous substances. The mouth might not be exactly the same from one person to another but the proportion of its inner volume to the volume of the lungs must be quite regular. Direct to lung (DTL), in my opinion has too many inconveniences for that purpose. The first one being that you don’t really “taste” much of anything, not in a complex or subtle way. Another one is that some variability can’t be controlled: lung volume, duration of draw, etc. Lastly, DTL practices often imply one or two large draws, not enough to provide for a tasting experience that accounts for how the flavor develops within a sesh.
Great post. I can see parallels to DHV in the cigar world for sure. There was a really good thread on the forum about the similarities of coffee brewing to DHV as well.

I love MTL for tasting my flower. I realize that in the tobacco world, cigar puffing or pipe puffing is often used to prime the plant and get a solid cherry going, but I would say the huge side benefit is smelling the surrounding smoke (or vapor) while inhaling. Smell and taste are hopelessly entangled senses and the full experience of tasting the oils as they coat your mouth is only heightened by smelling the vapor at the same time.
Second, fuck combustion. Or maybe that should’ve been first. Now that we know a lot more about cannabis, how complex it is and how refined culture techniques and genetics have evolved, the only way to realistically access what our sensory organs can make of it is through vaporizing. Certainly not mixing it with burning material. In this forum this argument is a given, and I need not labour it.
Agree here too. I understand that you say "fuck combustion" for cannabis but you enjoy combusting cigars. I enjoy a good cigar but I'm not a huge afficionado. If you are also passionate about cigars, have you ever considered vaping cigar tobacco or any other high quality tobacco? I have no idea if this is even a thing.
There is I think an aspect of cigar tasting can be imported directly into the realm of cannabis. In the cigar world, it is customary to divide the cigar in three thirds: the hay, the divine, the manure. During its first third, "the hay", the cigar wakes up, like in the morning, not entirely there but with hints and promises. The second third is by far the best, hence the “divine”, flavour and texture are at their maximum and most enjoyable. The last third is considered somehow as the bastardized version of the cigar, less desirable, starts to taste harsh. Some just don’t smoke it.
Cool facts. I suppose I'm one of those who can easily throw away the last third or "manure" phase of my flower. I'd much rather end a session with great taste than some lingering acrid taste because I got a bit greedy with the vape.
That what my first impression as well but it seems like there's more to it... maybe the writer got a little help ? Only future posts will tell.

@SirClip @borbjorbis the herbo Ti is the device in my collection that delivers the most intense and acute taste. And it's DTL only. But sure the taste reveals on the exhale.


Most (glass) stem based device are easy enough to clean to get rid of any aftertaste. But even when my devices have an aftertaste I do cold draws. Especially when the vapor path is short (vapman, Vaponic...), the taste of the green material easily covers the aftertaste of the device itself.
I like cold draws too although I never really thought to name them. I'm not sure I ever tasted things on the exhale that I didn't detect on some previous inhale. I'll have to pay closer attention.
There's also one thing I like to do : exhaling by mouth and nose. Even though the olfactory cells are saturated after the first exhale and take time to recover, I find this helps in getting a sustained perception of the whole flavor profile of your material.
Good point. I also do this.
I'm surprised you didn't mention the aftertaste you get from vaping (not the aftertaste of the device, the one in your mouth and olfactory tract).
If I don't RTL, I find this aftertaste mostly echoes the fruity notes for most of my current strains and it gives an other dimension to the flavor profile of said strain. For example I have a citrusy strain that taste citrus for the first third but turn to garlic and spices at the second third. Yet the aftertaste is a strong bergamot scent that lasts.
Sometimes my whole mouth feels coated with flavor after a session. I really enjoy it when it lingers. Some strains will easily clear my sinuses and just deliver such intense taste and smell. Exactly as you said, everything from peppery to floral and fruity. Terpenes are the best.
One last thing, when I'm vaping indoor and my sesh is done, if I left the room and come back a few minutes later (the time for olfactory cells to recover), I am always amazed at the remaining scent in the room. It's always pungent, complex and very heady. My favorite incense for sure...
It really is amazing. Sometimes it smells like potpourri. Sometimes incense or vanilla or lavender. It never smells like "weed" to me for some reason. I guess I'm biased. 😆
 

borbjorbis

Well-Known Member
any device (pipe or TED – Thermal Extraction Device), unless brand new, will impose an aftertaste.

the herbo Ti is the device in my collection that delivers the most intense and acute taste.
I think these two remarks together approximate a distinction I've been making on my own flavor journey, that is, the distinction between the "tastiest" and "most flavorful" vapor.

Maybe this is obvious, but I find that that truly every vape tastes different and brings out different flavor notes, and that's even before we account for fragrant materials like wood (and resin, to @SirClip's point) imparting additional flavors (flavors which can be equally enjoyable in their own right). It's pretty amazing to me how wildly different an experience you can get from different DHVs, in flavor and in effects.

But while every vape brings out different flavors, and therefore something like "tastiest" is ultimately a matter of personal preference, I do find that some vapes simply produce a more intense amplitude of their flavor signature, whatever that flavor signature may be. I think the Fusion for example absolutely just blasts you with flavor, completely paints your tongue.

I do find that often having at least some conduction in the mix deepens the flavor and makes it more acute. My perhaps unpopular opinion is that conduction-heavy hybrid vapes are more conducive to critical tasting, "I'm getting notes of..." shit, whereas pure convection is more like a drinking a sugary soft drink. Love both, but they serve different purposes for me.

Curious if other's experiences align with mine. Maybe we can propose "more or less flavorful" as a more objective measure of a vape's flavor output. I think the Fusion is more flavorful than my Vaponic, BAKx, even my Vapmans – but I wouldn't necessarily call it the tastiest, just because it starts to get a little apples to oranges-y if you really like to pay attention to taste.
 
Last edited:
borbjorbis,
Top Bottom