AirVape,Arizer ArGo, Haze Square for on demand use?

[Vapeur Rogue]

Hi
I have been enjoying on demand style vapes for a few years now- Lotus, Vapman, Firewood the longest.

Never tried a Arizer product-
recently though, the above listed vapes caught my eye.
Airvape, ArGo, Haze Square caught my eye- but as I am medical, efficiency and conservation are both important- would appreciate feedback on if these vapes are exclusively "session" (as in possible wasted vapor) or if I can pull 2-3x (at most, I usually sip) and then be done for a while.

Much thanks.

 

[bossman]

You sound like a Square Pro to me. My Solo II isn't convection or on demand. I think the ArGo is rated meh, more like a Solo II with a less potent heater and more plastic build.

Do you have a Lil Bud yet? That's my favorite vape since the new heater and switch upgrades. Takes a month to buy it since it's handmade. Great clouds and flavor though, plus the technique of drawing with this particular unregulated device is a really rewarding experience.

 

[Vapeur Rogue]

I don't have a Lil' Bud yet-
I need to save up for a spoiled brat multi-wood custom! Simply because I can- it will probably look like a patchwork quilt, LOL. I have mocked up some ideas in my cart for ideas.
I should've been more precise, I tried the FW2, and pretty much loved it to death! I missed models 3 and 4 financial reasons and some other personal stuff- but will be getting FW5.

I am also on the waitlist for Nomad...

I do prefer the earth tones and wood aesthetic wherever possible, so I can't say I'm disappointed about reducing my vape wishlist by 2 when they are of - to my senses- questionable aesthetic.

I hear wonderful things about Airizers here, and elsewhere-they came up with a portable that looked like it was more kltuz proof, I wanted to approach it with an open mind. Aesthetics, even though I have distinct opinions, are not deal breakers when it comes to my purposes.

So I keep the Square on my list. Thanks!

 

[bossman]

Many users here are way more expert than me when it comes to convection/conduction science. The Arizer Solo II is the top performer of their portable offerings. I have one and can recommend it for a klutz-proof portable for sure. It's just not an on demand or convection vape.

I'm a guitarist and also have a typical penchant for woodcraft. I went with cherry, cherry, and cherry and I don't even care for cherry when I see shit like speaker stands or cabinets. The LB with its beeswax finish doesn't feel "too red" to me. Compared to guitars the LB is just a simple thing and i can't excited about a contrast stem or button block. I mean sure: why not have some fun and spend a few more bucks. If I'd have known it'd come to be my favorite vape maybe I would have sprung for a wood upgrade, who knows.

And yeah, if you're set on an Arizer purchase I'd go with the Solo II. The most experienced reviewers agree it has the best vapor quality of their portables and the price was recently dropped everywhere so it's not as out of wack as it was prior to this summer. It won't be good for sipping and spreading out a bowl across a day or an evening though. If you sit it there with the glass stem inserted you'll find your material toasty from just waiting for you. Compared to the LB and my Tubo X all my session vapes feel that way now. I've taken to using my Fury 2 at home like a heater, putting it on top of a glass accessory and then removing it between draws.

 

[Vapeur Rogue]

I'm not totally set on Arizer, just not wanting to write them off hastily either.

Cherry- I considered it for my UD Micro-Dog, but ultimately went for Holly due to some (different) personal significance. But I end up getting excited about many woods.
I don't need to sip over a day, usually- but sometimes over a couple hrs.
I can appreciate the craftsmanship in musical instruments as well.

I am just coming back to the scene, and have not seriously considered session vapes much at all either. After reconsidering some desktops I had previously decided against, I am also considering what's new.