Search results

I'm not aware of any plastic in the path I'm not a fan of plastic, the ingoing air panel sure but that's pre heat. 🤷‍♂️

I use a hose, I run it to a bong but any distance helps dissipate the heat.

3-4 is average, I start hitting around 250 & usually get two good hits before reaching 390, I only go above that with kief or hash. Way more efficient than burning.

I spent a lot of time & some money wit the Arizer's, mods, brick builders, & it was still hit or miss, with the Lobo I just fill the dosing cap & go, not all packs are equal but even a off one gives a few solid good clouds.

Lobo gives out consistent thick vapor, the Solo II & XQ2 burn slower, tricky as hell to pack, perhaps more flavorful lite vapor. I didn't get the XQ2 to work good well at all until I got 3rd party mods, lousy bowl design IMO.

I agree, though its only my 3rd vaporizer, it replaced the other 2 Arizer ones, that I'm keen to sell now.

It's not just that device, it's many, phones, tablets, remotes so on... USB ports are just not that durable and are prone to break if you want to buy new device every year or less I guess that's fine but I prefer something a little more well made.

USB charging was stated as perk, It isn't, that point was on topic, nothing I stated was hypocritical. 🙄

USB port chargers are a fraction as durable as more traditional ones, my Lobo one is already flakey on the road to breaking after a few months whereas my Solo II is 3+ years old & is rock solid, what the idiots in the eurozone do is of no concern to me, just add that to list of bad choices that...

USB-C charging sucks, its one down point of the Lobo (up of the Solo II mach I) as for Improved airflow, stronger heater its up for debate, it looks exactly the same as the Solo II, I can't see it being anything but marginally improved, I'm aware of the other bells and whistles, nice but that's...

But the question is how does it compared to the original Solo II. 🤷 I just checked my Solo II and it took 30 seconds to reach the full 428 temperature, so...

...and I really didn't mean to troll but the Solo II was my first vape bought in 2020, I've only owned 3, it, the XQ2 & now the Lobo, I'm not a vape collector I just buy what I need. Since before I bought the Solo II I've heard nothing but glaring praise of it but having no other reference point...

Whatever, it works better than the Solo II or XQ2 for that matter & costs much less, "don't have to grind" what? I never used any of them w/o a grinder, I guess you could as you could with any of them but it doesn't mean its ideal.

After the Lobo looks MASSIVELY unimpressive, I have my old II set for sale I don't see much better on this one, inverted screen is ok but...

Yeah, this never happened to me. 🤷‍♂️

Its still better than the other 2 Arizer units I own, no other point of comparison, I don't own, or care to, every other vape on the market but for the price I'm pretty pleased.

I plug it back in after every session to keep it up, USB ports go bad often & are not the best charging method IMO, had it a couple months, the connection can be finicky and I can only see it getting worse over time, whereas I've had the Solo II for about 3 years with a traditional charger and...

I honestly never noticed, it cooks so fast, it may or not may not do this, as long as it cooks & gets the job done I don't care so much, I set it to the 6 minute max at 390 start hitting at 250, its usually spent at 4 minutes & I power it off. 🤷‍♂️ The power jack going out is more of an concern...

Yeah, tried that, didn't work, screwed around & finally got the port to click into place. I can see this going bad over time though, this is why USB charging sucks over a regular charger. Seems to very with weed, I never toast darker than 390F so, start hitting at about 250, usually 2 good hits...

Has anyone had problems with the USB bus charging, it plugs is reads full bars if it's not charging, moving bars if it is, today I had to try a half dozen times to get it to engage, tried different cables, it's the port connection.