Search results

It depends what you mean by freedom. Freedom without ethics is not freedom. It's the worst prison.

I meant the first part of the post. Everyone can do what they want. Also thrusting themself a traffic light in the ass, if it is deemed appropriate. And if this means freedom, that's why the world is getting worse...

You can do what you think is best for you but what I said is not an opinion, it's a fact!

I would tell you to let go conduction ones and throw you on CONVECTION. I am very satisfied with my Flowermate swift pro. Excellent value for money.

Animals are sentient beings with a central nervous system. Plants no. We must feed on life, but not on animals, which experience emotions exactly like us.

@ClearBlueLou Sorry it seems a bit hysterical! The moral superiority, if any, is in relation to other human beings who have decided not to deepen the concept of ethics. Honestly, I didn't become veg to feel superior to others. I just wanted to be better than I was. I prefer to feel stupid...

Are the hunters environmentalists? And are pornstars virgin? I believe there is a better way to take care of nature than to shoot unarmed animals in their habitat. Rather, let's say there is a great deal of business behind animal derivatives production. I think it's more honest to say...

Amazed that someone posted it! Fantastic! :D:tup:

@Accept I think maninthemachine has already answered exhaustively, refuting this theory

@OldNewbie Sorry mate but this was really a clumsy attempt! :D

You can live very well even if you don't eat animal derivatives. Millions of vegans testify to you every day. I understand the closing reactions when talking about one's food culture, but we must understand that that food is suffering. You eat suffering and suffering becomes part of you. I...

@nosmoking I think I wrote very clearly in my previous posts. I have not received "one" relevant answer, but only misrepresentations, misunderstandings, I think they were intended. When "you don't want to" understand there is little to talk about.

This until the reasonable being meets a much more reasonable being who shows him that he is wrong. At that point, the reasonable being has two options: to increase his own reasonableness, or to continue to believe that he is reasonable even if he is not. I think it's called "double-talk"...

yes, unless you don't have the misfortune to sit on millions of liters of oil.

Life is made of stairs. There are those who go down and there are those who go up. Can I answer you this way? ;) Sorry but reading your answer, you look like the troll! :D No one said this !!! Do you read the posts or do you pretend?

It is not this statement that reduces the value of a human life, but often it is the human being himself who reduces the value of his existence, behaving like (and worse) an animal. We have to look at animals as human beings trapped (for various reasons) in an animal body. They are not beings...

Try to guess! :p

This is because you still have an "animal" view of life. It is part of the ancestral preservation instinct that sees animals as threats or resources and places man on a higher level. I say that this higher level only means that we have a greater responsibility. But I often see men claiming...

@OldNewbie I don't think the "number" of the world population is as relevant as their "behavior" and the attitude of the industry to produce in a sustainable manner. I mean, they make oil wars but we keep driving cars, farting their gas in the atmosphere. Do we want to understand that we can...

That's Right! And cigarette smoke? We know very well that it hurts, that it causes numerous diseases including cancer. Yet many people continue to do so. Because they can't do without it. Even if they say "I do it because I like it. I stop when I want". Tradition is therefore an addiction...