Your post prompted me to think... mine has grown quieter since new (I rely more on the tactile, vs the aural, but still like to hear the click). Will have to see if I can get mine back 'up to spec', as wellThank you!!!!! My click was barely audible and now it's not perfect but definitely better.
)Great to see how well it works, hope that means I can get my hands on one soon.I have been testing the fusion induction cap by @DgN'R
It is comfortable as hell.
Faster with the one than the official cap with the flare (25-30 vs 30 vs 40). The SS alloy is heated up way better.
There is no click, but, since it is made to use induction i dont see a big problem (I have to try it with the inductor, that will be more complex maybe
This is a video i made showing the results with half-bowl setting, herb, and 190C on the wand with the new madheaters adapter. It takes 29-30 sec, gives me great flavor, good clouds and the abv is still light
Thanks for your video, this looks promising. Do you have a flare to test it with?I have been testing the fusion induction cap by @DgN'R
It is comfortable as hell.
Faster with the one than the official cap with the flare (25-30 vs 30 vs 40). The SS alloy is heated up way better.
There is no click, but, since it is made to use induction i dont see a big problem (I have to try it with the inductor, that will be more complex maybe
This is a video i made showing the results with half-bowl setting, herb, and 190C on the wand with the new madheaters adapter. It takes 29-30 sec, gives me great flavor, good clouds and the abv is still light
The flare works better with the original cap. With this one, it works at 60W…
Yeah, it wasn't designed specifically for the Flare, but rather for an optimized wand experience. But it should probably work better with the new Flare revision, hopefully when they come out. Some testers have mentioned that it works well with the first version of the Flare
Currently, I've made a last-minute revision to the cap to offer faster screwing and unscrewing (less threading) as well as to avoid thermal lock during prolonged consecutive use. Performance will not change. I'm waiting for the final sample. Sorry for those in a hurry, but I wanted to do it before the official release to avoid releasing a V2 a few months later. This should only delay things by a month. Please, be patient
Will folk in the UK be able to purchase your cap when it's released?Thank you for releasing the video @kokolokokolokon
Yeah, it wasn't designed specifically for the Flare, but rather for an optimized wand experience. But it should probably work better with the new Flare revision, hopefully when they come out. Some testers have mentioned that it works well with the first version of the Flare
For comparison, with the original cap and wand, it takes about 1 minute 45 seconds to heat up, and you need to set the wand to maximum temperature (430°C) or heat up the cap twice in a row to get good results and you'll get about 10-12 heats from a full battery.
With the SUS430 IH Cap, it heats up very quickly in just 30 seconds, and a temperature of 190-210°C seems more than sufficient with flowers. The cap also offers good heat retention and you could get about 18-20 heats from a full battery.
This is a very good complement for the Dani Fusion 2.0, and performance has been significantly improved when using the wand. The cap is specially designed for use under induction and is in no way intended to replace the original cap, which works perfectly well with a torch lighter (and its click will be very useful).
I really like the Dani Fusion 2.0, the steam is so smooth and it delivers huge clouds effortlessly. The Artemis 2.0 stem is beautifully designed! BFG does great job!
Thanks for the feedback @oddjobold
About the click, I understand your concerns. Personally, I use the wand in auto mode until the “Time Over” message appears, then I use PP MagSink Stand to help with cooling when I'm done, but I understand that this can be interesting (especially for consecutive bowls). As it's for induction only, I thought it wasn't necessary (as the wand indicates the end of the heating process), but I might consider an audible or visual indicator later on
Currently, I've made a last-minute revision to the cap to offer faster screwing and unscrewing (less threading) as well as to avoid thermal lock during prolonged consecutive use. Performance will not change. I'm waiting for the final sample. Sorry for those in a hurry, but I wanted to do it before the official release to avoid releasing a V2 a few months later. This should only delay things by a month. Please, be patient
Yes, of course
With a torch lighter, whether a small or large flame, it will take longer to heat up than the original cap. The cap is not intended for use with a torch (thickness is relatively thick), as the original cap and these silver rings (which offers the best thermal conductivity and fast heating) already excels in this respect.
