Favourite Quotes

florduh

Well-Known Member
image.png


An all-timer from Eugene Debs
 

florduh

Well-Known Member
“There is so much fucking money in this country, and there’s so much work being done. If you work a full fucking week, you should be able to pay your fucking rent. You shouldn’t have to go and get another fucking job and still be struggling. It’s bad for the country.”

-Bill Burr

Bill_Burr_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg


🫡
 

CANtalk

Well-Known Member
So much out there to mine for excellent quotes & thx for the previous post recognition :love:


And a quick example of the study of logic & science... a back & forth discussing logical fallacies that enlightens & shows disingenuous intentions as well as the way ✨
Is it fallacious to appeal to scientific authority when the current consensus is precisely what is in contention? If yes, is this an example of Scientism? If no, why not?

No. No. Category error. Unless you’re publishing in the peer-reviewed literature, the scientific consensus wins. If you don’t like the scientific consensus and you’re not publishing—nobody cares.

For example: ivermectin does not cure or prevent covid. If you argue this with your doctor, they will invoke the scientific consensus and not write you a prescription. If you argue this with your insurance company, they will likewise cite the scientific consensus and not reimburse you. And if you argue this with your local tack and feed store, they’ll ask to see a picture of your horse and, when that isn’t forthcoming, cite the scientific consensus and kick you to the curb. The fact that you really, really want to challenge the scientific consensus doesn’t make the consensus invalid.

Scientism is the belief that scientific inquiry is the only valid form of epistemology. As best I can tell, no one believes this. The term is mostly used to slur your opponents. Arguing that you ought to be allowed to ingest horse dewormer because Jesus told you to is not an effective argument, nor is labelling your opponents with “scientism” because they don't accept divine revelation as a useful guide to pharmacology.

If you want to challenge the scientific consensus effectively, go to grad school.

Moar to see, understand & disregard :tup:



You'll see politicians in a whole new ufb crazy way :whoa: & with the worst whataboutism crutches, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

:peace: :leaf:
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom