tokenknifeguy
Well-Known Member
Can we ask what vapes one should get that are better than the dani fusion? Bc that is where I"m at now, wondering if the tech has caught up with the fusion.
-
SCAM WARNING! See how this scam works in Classifieds.
What vapes are better than the Dani Fusion
- Thread starter tokenknifeguy
- Start date
TheScamericann
Well-Known Member
I'd say the solo 3
An induction heater for it...or if you already have an IH an IH upgrade?
coolbreeze
Well-Known Member
This. Or have a look at the Vestratto Tornado. My Fusion 2.0 is new to me and I really love it, it's a fantastic vape. Not only do I have no complaints but I've been pleasantly surprised to learn how good it really is. The Tornado is similar in that it's a torch vape with extended heating mass but it's also different than all the others because it has an atomizer built into it which reduces the size of the vapor particles, making it super-smooth, thick, and very powerful. Of course there are many, many vapes that are also powerful and otherwise great, some probably 'better' than the Fusion 2.0, but the Tornado is similar enough to compare.
fede98
Member
there are many good ones but in the end vaporizers are all different, I don't know from what point of view you want a better one or what kind of vaporizer you are looking for, whether one is heated by flame or electronic, desktop or portable... for example, me Now I'm using a desktop ball vape and I don't think there's anything better in terms of power and flavor.. I don't have a dani but I have dynavap, anvil vestratto, vapman and vapocane, the first 2 are quite similar to the dani, if you are looking for something with similar if not better power but electronic only a ball vape or perhaps some vape similar to the airvape legacy pro or tinymight 2 can more than satisfy you... but you have to understand what features you are looking for in particular
BFG Fangirl answer: Nothing. Fusion 2.0 is bae. Maaaaybe the Dani's for brutal Stainless Steel core extraction with more hits per heatup, since the Fusion 2.0 is all about fast extraction and huge clouds if you push it.
More reasonable answer: What is "better" to you? "Better" and "Different" are the same thing here, because the Fusion 2.0 is that good. So what do you need?
More reasonable answer: What is "better" to you? "Better" and "Different" are the same thing here, because the Fusion 2.0 is that good. So what do you need?
mazinho420
Member
I recommend a thermal accumulator
darkstar72
Well-Known Member
I recommend a plug in.
AndyO
Well-Known Member
Tornado if you want to stay in the TED space. It's impossible to explain, it just hits different.
Again, I see a lot of naming random devices without (including OP) describing what "better" means. A "better" for one person is a "worse" for another so you gotta clarify.
Tabletopbong/Lee seems to think it really has "sublimation", which he can tell as an aspect all of his "sublimation" devices have that others do not. He describes it as stripping away the sleepier parts of the herb leaving a brighter more THC heavy high. He says this is because it nullifies some of the harsh terpenes, which also leads to a smoother vapor. But even he doesn't truly explain past that.
Not for me, because I prefer to choose my effects by strain and like the body/dopey/calming affect.
If the "sublimation" is really just a parity between the stem/oven temperature and the hot air temperature, isn't that just hybrid heating? If the stepdown in diameter of the stem is causing "gasification" wouldn't we be able to see/implement this in a random aftermarket stem system. Maybe we will. I love "new" (10 year old) advancements in tech.
Tabletopbong/Lee seems to think it really has "sublimation", which he can tell as an aspect all of his "sublimation" devices have that others do not. He describes it as stripping away the sleepier parts of the herb leaving a brighter more THC heavy high. He says this is because it nullifies some of the harsh terpenes, which also leads to a smoother vapor. But even he doesn't truly explain past that.
Not for me, because I prefer to choose my effects by strain and like the body/dopey/calming affect.
If the "sublimation" is really just a parity between the stem/oven temperature and the hot air temperature, isn't that just hybrid heating? If the stepdown in diameter of the stem is causing "gasification" wouldn't we be able to see/implement this in a random aftermarket stem system. Maybe we will. I love "new" (10 year old) advancements in tech.
coolbreeze
Well-Known Member
From my understanding, these don't technically sublimate the vapor (turn it from vapor to gas) but they do reduce partical size, making it more absorbable by more of your lung's surface. What he is saying, I believe, is that when you have the temperatures in equilibrium between the atomizer and the heater they tend to roast off the terps, making it more pure THC in the vapor. If the atomizer is at a lower temp than the heater, you will get the terps in the atomized vapor. You can achieve this temperature differential with the Flower Kettle and Electropath but not the other two, iiuc.
I don't find it necessarily being a lot brighter, to be honest. It does have a very full effect for me. But I'm not sure I'd consider it especially sedative either.
It's the stepdown and the heat together that make the gassification (or atomization).
You'd have to heat it somehow. If it was like the Sublimator or Tornado, it would take heat from the heater itself.