Recent content by EverythingsHazy

It sounds like it may be an allergy of some sort, and if it is, more exposure may lead to increased symptom severity, instead of a built up resistance. That's why it is usually advised to avoid foods that one is allergic to, rather than to continue to consume them in the hopes that the allergy...

E-Nano + Big Bong = smooth, huge vapor clouds, with great flavor It's a convection vape, but that doesn't make it any less powerful. If you want more convection effects, you can always let the GonG heat up for a while, but be careful to not touch it and get a serious burn.

Lmaoooo I meant for the No Adverse Effects dosage numbers! :lol: I can't imagine too many people signing up for the LD50 testing. Either way, it does look like good news, so I'm happy to see it. Thanks for sharing. Very interesting. I'd be curious to hear a bit more about your mushroom...

These are cool findings, and I hope more research gets published that supports the safety of Cannabis, however, this is just an in silico study, and can't be taken as proof that the numbers will actually line up with actual human data. It would be awesome if they do, though.

I need to do some chemistry research, but I don't think it works the way a lot of vaporizer enthusiasts think. For instance, just because you don't hit the boiling temp of a chemical, doesn't mean that it doesn't evaporate. If you spill water on the floor, it will dry up in a 60F room, without...

Does the peak include the future? If not, then yes, and we will probably remain in continuously improving golden age for a long time. If it does, then no, because it's very unlikely that better vaporizer tech won't come out in the next few decades, and much less in the next century or so, if we...

That would make a lot more sense. 0.0025g would be some crumbs lol 1/400th of a gram is a tiny dose, even for wax. :lol:

I quoted what they found, and didn't cherrypick anything. I even left in the "strength" and "coherence" sections, which support their alternative explanation. The conclusions were not "muddied", at all, nor do they prove that anything I have said is incorrect. They simply support the presented...

What kind of scale are you using to weigh out 0.0025g?

From what I've read, so far, I wouldn't be confident claiming that Cannabis use causes schizophrenia in people who aren't predisposed to get it, but I also wouldn't be comfortable dismissing the correlations, even though I would prefer that they end up not being indicative of a causal...

Interesting paper. Read through it, just now. It's worth noting that it's not an experiment, for anyone who isn't going to read it, themselves, but rather a review of some other data, and that it's from 2005, which is a limitation that definitely shouldn't be discounted, given the fact that...

A lot of people drink alcohol without ever noticing it's negative effects on their brains/bodies, but that doesn't mean there aren't any. It just means they are lucky enough for them not to have been bad enough to recognize, and/or that they may have been attributed to something else, if they...

If one wants to be aware of the negatives of something, it's best to try one's best to reduce confirmation/desirability bias in one's research. Anyone who wants to know the truth about the potential negatives of Cannabis use would be wise to look for the bad stuff, and then use the information...

There are a few. I haven't fully read all of the papers, and what I have already read doesn't seem to be a particularly strong indicator of causality, however, here is one: https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21060664 As you can see, there seems to be somewhat of an...

Idk about that. There is a lot of data showing associations with certain brain regions being smaller, with increased risks for schizophrenia in people who are predisposed to getting it, and with worse results in certain cognitive tests. Whether they are all causative or not is a different story...