Obama Administration Eliminates Gratuitous Barrier to Medical Marijuana Research

Silver420Surfer

Downward spiral
http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/22/obama-administration-eliminates-gratuito

For decades federal officials have argued that there is not enough evidence of marijuana's medical benefits to justify removing it from Schedule I, the most restrictive category of the Controlled Substances Act. At the same time, they have made it difficult to do the research necessary to provide such evidence by erecting gratuitous bureaucratic obstacles. This week, according to a Federal Register notice to be published tomorrow, the Obama administration is lifting one of those barriers by eliminating an additional layer of review by the U.S. Public Health Service for studies involving marijuana.

"The Obama administration has actively supported scientific research on whether marijuana or its components can be safe and effective medicine," a spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy told The Huffington Post. "Eliminating the Public Health Service review should help facilitate additional research to advance our understanding of both the adverse effects and potential therapeutic uses for marijuana or its components."

As the Post's Ryan Grim notes, even prohibitionists such as anti-pot activist Kevin Sabet and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) have recently said the process for getting medical studies approved should be streamlined. In addition to Public Health Service review, the special burdens on cannabis researchers include the necessity of obtaining marijuana from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), the only legal source. The Drug Enforcement Administration has rejected requests to allow private sources of marijuana for research, as it does with all other Schedule I drugs. But NIDA itself recently has responded to criticism of its stinginess and the poor quality of its offerings by expanding its menu, another piece of evidence that the administration is serious about making medical marijuana research easier to do.

"The president has often said that drug policy should be dictated by unimpeded science instead of ideology, and it's great to see the Obama administration finally starting to take some real action to back that up," says Marijuana Majority's Tom Angell. "But there's more to be done. The next step should be moving marijuana out of Schedule I to a more appropriate category, which the administration can do without any further congressional action. Given what the president and surgeon general have already said publicly about marijuana's relative harms and medical uses, it's completely inappropriate for it to remain in a schedule that's supposed to be reserved for substances with a high potential for abuse and no therapeutic value."

Good news to start the week.
 

CarolKing

Singer of songs and a vapor connoisseur
This is from April 19, 2015
From The Montley Fool This is part of it.
President Obama crushes marijuana supporters with these 15 words
But, in spite of marijuana's incredible momentum -- which has led 23 states (plus Washington, D.C.) to approve it for medical use, and four states (plus Washington, D.C.) to legalize it for recreational use -- President Obama had some choice words earlier this month while speaking in Jamaica about the future of the marijuana industry in the United States.

3963942915_680e808898_z_large.jpg


When asked about where the U.S. stands on the legalization of marijuana, Obama uttered 15 words sure to send shivers down the spines of marijuana supporters:
I do not foresee, any time soon, Congress changing the law at a national basis.

President Obama's expanded commentary went as follows:

Right now, that is not federal policy, and I do not foresee, any time soon, Congress changing the law at a national basis. But I do think that if there are states that show that they are not suddenly a magnet for additional crime, that they have a strong enough public health infrastructure to push against the potential for increased addiction, then it's conceivable that it will spur on a national debate. But that is going to be some time off.

In other words, we have a reinforcement from the president that the federal government is still concerned with the potential long-term effects marijuana might have on a user in terms of its potential addictive qualities, as well as its potential to increase crime rates.


Maybe Obama meant that Congress won't but maybe he will? Just trying to find a silver lining to his words.
CK
 
Last edited:

Vicki

Herbal Alchemist
This is from April 19, 2015
From The Montley Fool This is part of it.
President Obama crushes marijuana supporters with these 15 words
But, in spite of marijuana's incredible momentum -- which has led 23 states (plus Washington, D.C.) to approve it for medical use, and four states (plus Washington, D.C.) to legalize it for recreational use -- President Obama had some choice words earlier this month while speaking in Jamaica about the future of the marijuana industry in the United States.

3963942915_680e808898_z_large.jpg


When asked about where the U.S. stands on the legalization of marijuana, Obama uttered 15 words sure to send shivers down the spines of marijuana supporters:
I do not foresee, any time soon, Congress changing the law at a national basis.

President Obama's expanded commentary went as follows:

Right now, that is not federal policy, and I do not foresee, any time soon, Congress changing the law at a national basis. But I do think that if there are states that show that they are not suddenly a magnet for additional crime, that they have a strong enough public health infrastructure to push against the potential for increased addiction, then it's conceivable that it will spur on a national debate. But that is going to be some time off.

In other words, we have a reinforcement from the president that the federal government is still concerned with the potential long-term effects marijuana might have on a user in terms of its potential addictive qualities, as well as its potential to increase crime rates.

What a dick...seriously?
 
Last edited:

farscaper

Well-Known Member
only the synthetic drugs derived from the plant are in their scope because they can be capitalized upon.

money only hangs with money. money doesnt give a fuck about freedom.

hence why cannabis remains schedule 1 while marinol is a schedule 3....

not that cannabis should be scheduled at all... its just a flower after all....

buy our drugs designed by man!
fuck nature... its dangerous!
 
Top Bottom