NoSmoke said:
aesthyrian said:
This shouldn't be news to anyone that thinks before they cram "food" down their throat.
I don't eat any of that crap, and eat a mostly natural and organic diet with no meat though, so I'm just a crazy hippie that knows too much
My first job was at a McDonalds when I was 14, I learned a young age what this country calls "food" and how and who "prepares" it. Yuck...
And lets stop pretending that McDonalds is the only bad fast food for you.
Who's pretending
, what's sad is the fact that the mainstream media wouldn't give this the light of day until now. Arbys roast beef is horrible as well, it isn't even meat, its a liquid they turn into mock roast beef. I still eat McDonalds, but the fact that a burger and won't decompose 20 years later is insane, that might push me to completely exclude it. I've also heard the ground beef at Taco Bell is the same grade beef as dog food, that could be one of those "urban myths" though, not quite sure.
Organic food is a waste of money. please track down the organic food episode of bullshit.
how is it insane that it won't decompose in 20 years, it's pretty well explained in the shitty article posted in the first link, but the meat doesn't decompose due to salt content.
if you don't eat things on the basis of salt content than that's a reasonable reason to object to eating mcdonalds, or beef jerky, but just because the food won't decompose?
that's a silly reason.
why would you care that taco bell is "dog food grade" why would that bother you?
is dog grade food toxic? i sure hope not, you feed it to your dog.
does it taste bad? well that's slightly subjective but if it did would you still eat it?
than for what reason?
i could cut a steak and call it dog food grade, and then i would eat it.
would you look down on me for eating dog food grade steak?
people are silly, and this article is silly it's obvious that mike adams can't tell his head from his ass.
he poses the question "why won't the buns decompose?" and then adds in a list of the ingredients, and draws no intelligent conclusions from the stated information.
he then makes the statement "it's not food" in bold, even though he has done nothing to define what is food, so i'm going to accurately state, that by the definition of food as outlined in that article, an apple is not food. neither are eggs, or a banana, or lettuce.
it's a silly article, i wouldn't subscribe to any information released by that source if they were willing to publish nonsense like the link contained.
if you stop eating at mcdonalds do it for some other reason other than "it won't decompose".
oh, and yay first post!
