e-nano or vapexhale evo

Status
Not open for further replies.

Delta3DStudios

Well-Known Member
Accessory Maker
Nano is cheaper, and has no microprocessors to control the power flow (The Nano's temperature controller is a simple analog PWM). Nano however is more durable than the Evo (no expensive glass "bamboo" vapor path to worry about).

With the Nano, temperatures may change slightly depending on time of day and the power conditions in your house. With the Evo, you're getting the same temperature at the same setting no matter what outlet you use in your house.

Additionally I believe there is an increased drag resistance with the Nano. Not a problem since the drag is still low, but head to head, I feel like the Evo is the winner

Does that make the nano a worse vaporizer? Up to you to decide. For my personal needs, the Nano works just fine as an efficient vaporizer for one person.

Would I buy an Evo if I really wanted it and had the extra money? Sure. But do I need it? Eh, not really. There are other vapes I'd rather play with
 

iDRINKBLEACH

knowing is half the power - Gi-JOE
Accessory Maker
I have and use both models. My unbiased opinion is that they're different vaporizers. That's about all I'm willing to contribute based on a 7 word request. Exactly what kind of experience are you after?
Ha sorry about the short questions. You get what you pay for with prepaid phones and that $30 phone was just moving to slow to go into great detail about it. I am on my laptop now. The first post answered my question I had. Id like a steady temp that isn't being altered by other elements like power, and temperature in the house. I live in the country where power isnt always the greatest and living in northern US it does hit -40 to -50 in the winter. Keeping the house on the colder side unless I start up a bunch of heating that runs my ele. bill sky high because of rural energy. Sounds like the Evo is more what im looking for.
 
iDRINKBLEACH,

biohacker

Well-Known Member
I honestly cannot say for this EVO, but I think it does have an operating range as well. Reason I mention this is because the previous Cloud generation definitely had some issues turning on if it was too cold in the house for some people. IMO, although the Nano can be affected by electricity which means you need to bump the temp up or down, has a previous owner of 2 Nano's and 1 EVO (4 or 5 Clouds), I would go for the Nano myself, for many many reasons - but if you wanna know you will have to PM me. Good luck.
 

max

Out to lunch
Sounds like the Evo is more what im looking for.
I wouldn't worry about varying voltage with either model, and the same goes for room temp as long as it's not jumping up and down, which doesn't sound like your situation. The EVO does shine when it comes to maintaining good hits no matter how hard you hit it though. The e-nano is more versatile in that you can use it for small hits or bigger ones when you connect it to a glass piece. These two models are quite complementary and I use both, with the e-nano getting picked up more often, for my vaping style.
 

biohacker

Well-Known Member
The EVO does shine when it comes to maintaining good hits no matter how hard you hit it though.

That was my experience with the Cloud, but definitely not the EVO since the bamboo changed. If I ripped on the EVO as hard as I wanted, I would get the same amount of vapour as say, an LSV. It was definitely sensitive to my draw, but the bamboo was wide open with no restriction (Cloud had a bit).
 
biohacker,
  • Like
Reactions: KidFated.

biohacker

Well-Known Member
Like I mentioned before, it was an early EVO. However there was a bunch of talk about it in the EVO thread. But for that very reason I much preferred my Cloud+.
 
biohacker,

biohacker

Well-Known Member
@max this was just posted on friday.... i guess bamboos vary somewhat between EVOs. I'd much prefer a "less open" EVO, but then again for some reason the Cloud/EVO always tore my lungs apart more than any other vape i've used.
 
biohacker,
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom