Cheap High Quality Bubbler

Deano

Well-Known Member
Random question. Let's say you had up to $60 to spend right now on any dhgate piece you like. What would it be and why?

I use flower more than anything and I love big flavorful hits. I'm wanting to order something new but there's just so many it's overwhelming. Plus I'm a researcher and that's not always a good thing when trying to make decisions lol
 
Deano,
  • Like
Reactions: A1FBG

Frederick McGuire

Aggressively Loungey
Steve just posted his version of the Matrix CLEAR. @Frederick McGuire could you get him some proper measurements?
Got a link?
I just sorted his store by release date, and got a honeybucket, straight tube, the cool dropdown donut beaker, and the new stereo matrix (did anyone work with steven on that btw? seems like a massive waste of opportunity to basically just change a slightly bent neck to an angled neck for the 186/200... functionally and aesthetically the differences are almost non-existent... if it had been a bubbler neck, sidecar, or removable mouthpiece I'd be interested, but atm I don't see anything the 200 has over the 186...)

Off the top of my head, the clear has a 75mm can, is ~10 inches tall to the top of the can, and ~12 inches tall to the top of the mouthpiece.
Not too sure on the Neck Bore, but IMO just a slightly longer version of the FC-1000 neck would be perfect.
 

NimbusVapor

Well-Known Member
Got a link?
I just sorted his store by release date, and got a honeybucket, straight tube, the cool dropdown donut beaker, and the new stereo matrix (did anyone work with steven on that btw? seems like a massive waste of opportunity to basically just change a slightly bent neck to an angled neck for the 186/200... functionally and aesthetically the differences are almost non-existent... if it had been a bubbler neck, sidecar, or removable mouthpiece I'd be interested, but atm I don't see anything the 200 has over the 186...)

Off the top of my head, the clear has a 75mm can, is ~10 inches tall to the top of the can, and ~12 inches tall to the top of the mouthpiece.
Not too sure on the Neck Bore, but IMO just a slightly longer version of the FC-1000 neck would be perfect.
 
NimbusVapor,
  • Like
Reactions: A1FBG

Frederick McGuire

Aggressively Loungey
Cheers :)

Looks like a similar can to the 187...

The bubble at the bottom looks wrong to me too - maybe it's just the scale of the piece or something, but it looks odd...

Just throwing it out there, Would everyone prefer a straight up clear knockoff, or something like a clear-sized ion?

I know I personally would kinda like a clear sized ion - Functionally they would be near identical, and I assume it would be a bit simpler for them to produce than the bubble bottom of the clear...

Like Basically what I'm describing is the can and foot of the FC-187, but scaled up to 75mm diameter, 8-10 inches tall.
I can only imagine that the base on that thing would be sturdy as all hell - and possibly make it a perfect contender for the "leave my vape connected all the time without worrying it'll tip over" category :)

(IMO new pieces that are heavily inspired by, but easily visually distinct from existing pieces are better than just straight clone knockoffs - [Even though I have purchased my fair share of direct knockoffs:lol:])
 
Last edited:

alltoreup

Damn you, party liquor
I'm thinking I like where he's going with the Clear copy for sure. I hadn't seen anyone mention it but me likey!

I'm wondering if there'd be any interest in a UFO can with a Matrix perc? Seems like the removable MP for whip attachment is pretty popular as is the matrix perc so I bet it would sell just as well. As a potential purchaser of the UFO to go with my brand new OGB mouthpiece, I'd also be interested in the UFO style can and removable MP with a matrix perc
 
alltoreup,

Dangus

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
New one from Kathy

rBVaG1Wbj4qAbfUYAAILRAln38Q409.jpg

http://www.dhgate.com/product/bong-2015-july-new-glass-bongs-double-recycler/246021760.html
 

John Lewus

Well-Known Member
How hard is it to do a minor repair to one of these Chinese pieces and what kind of tool would I need? My FC-186 has some small glass shards coming off the bottom that I can't explain how it happened. When I do a pressure test no air escapes but if I have it filled with water and use a cloth it is damp. Their is a tiny amount of water leaking through those shards.

It seems like if I could just torch it for a few minutes and make the glass a bit soft it could be repaired but I know nothing about glass and have had no luck finding a local cheap glass blower who would just do this quick touch up without charging me more than what the piece costs new.

I don't know if this is the right thread to ask but it is in reference to one of the pieces I bought from this thread recommendation. What steps do I need to go through?
 
John Lewus,
  • Like
Reactions: ovrez
I wouldn't start at page 1 anyway - 99% of the links on this thread are dead.

There is much information to cover (including which vendors can be trusted)
You can either review the past 20-30 pages to see what models people are talking about. Or you can visit this thread which contains links and reviews to DHgate pieces:
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/d...-you-must-post-a-review-see-first-post.15709/

(I encourage others to please keep that thread alive - lets continue to post pictures links and reviews in that thread, it's gone a bit stale in the past two months!)
Word. Got some new glass on its way, plan to add to the reviews. Definitely nice to have the feedback all in one place, since this thread is more of a "Today, in Chinese glass..." thread.
 
Last edited:

John Lewus

Well-Known Member
@John Lewus Aquarium Silicone bro works wonders. One day I'll post pics of all my self repaired silicone glass!!
Kathy killed that Klein I'm surprisingly impressed!!

Thanks for the tip! Does this provide any structural Integrity or just a seal! I have a hydratube that is starting to break at a joint but not where water flows.
 
John Lewus,
What are the appropriate dhgate search terms for the angled adapter circled in this pic, or a u shaped adapter if possible (upright vape to fc-710 or d-020d)?

If there is no query other than "angled glass adapter," does anyone know the proper terminology? I can ask my LHS to make one if it comes to that.

As an aside, I had not noticed that the newest nectar collector had an all-clear version available, I'd only seen the color ones. Cool, as I don't care much for colored glass. I do love the color changing effects of fuming, though...
 
Last edited:
ragnorokk,

Delta3DStudios

Well-Known Member
Accessory Maker
What are the appropriate dhgate search terms for the angled adapter circled in this pic, or a u shaped adapter if possible (upright vape to fc-710 or d-020d)?

If there is no query other than "angled glass adapter," does anyone know the proper terminology? I can ask my LHS to make one if it comes to that.


Typically when you search for angled adapters, you search by angle. Typical angles are 15, 30, 45, and 90 degree angles.

That adapter in question however looks closer to a 160-degree angle. Last year I spent a while looking around for those, couldn't really find any American blowers willing to make one for me.

Maybe try Oregon Glass Blower? (@Oregonglassblower)
 
Delta3DStudios,
  • Like
Reactions: nihil
Typically when you search for angled adapters, you search by angle. Typical angles are 15, 30, 45, and 90 degree angles.

That adapter in question however looks closer to a 160-degree angle. Last year I spent a while looking around for those, couldn't really find any American blowers willing to make one for me.

Maybe try Oregon Glass Blower? (@Oregonglassblower)
I see that Gentleman vapes sells a pen specific one. I would like something simple like that for my globe pens, but totally clear. I'll look into OGB, see what some adapters might run me.
 

Oregonglassblower

Well-Known Member
Glass Blower
I see that Gentleman vapes sells a pen specific one. I would like something simple like that for my globe pens, but totally clear. I'll look into OGB, see what some adapters might run me.
Hey there. No problem at all. I can make you whatever you may need for an angled adapter. Just PM me a pic or sketch and we can talk.
 

MilkyMondays

Well-Known Member
Any opions on the FC711 (mini pillar)?? The only thing i don't like is the sidecar mouthpeice. The FC1000 it just looks so large for vapor..

The Binary matrix video was uploaded. Still wondering when it will be for sale..
Hopefully soon! I just sent him this message, which I know many of you will appreciate:
Steven,

Would it be possible to have this mouthpiece as an option?
Mobius_Atom_Matrix_4_1024x1024.jpg

http://s22.postimg.org/eo5jnidj5/215mobius_2443.jpg

Many FC forum members requested this as the preferred style.
 

MGG

Well-Known Member

Deano

Well-Known Member
My first dhgate piece was the d20 I purchased from the sunshinestore. Over all the quality was great and price was too.

Who is putting out the best quality and best performing bubblers online? I've read rave reviews from many and while the appearance is very similar between blowers they apparently do not all function as well.
 
Deano,

pacifica333

Well-Known Member
Replacement FC-1000 arrived yesterday, CCG Torus today.

FC-1000: Nearly flawless. Works exactly as intended, chugs nice, has a super satisfying clear. Clearing it is interesting, though. It takes more lung that you first think, because of the amount of vapor still before the perc to clear. It takes some getting used to, but is perfectly easy to clear once adjusted. The only imperfection is a minor dent in the rim of the base. Even though I'll be using it almost exclusively with my UD's, I still feel it would be best suited to combustion. I couldn't be more satisfied, though. This has become my DD paired with my UD cranked up a bit on the VVPS. Fat, milky, delicious clouds; one and done stems.
jnEzvILl.jpg

TL;DR: This is my new go-to piece for use with my logs.

CCG Torus: Looks stellar. Super clean thick glass, very sturdy. A couple of nagging issues, though. The water level is finicky. If you set it to be even with the support for the joint, you have to pull like a madman to get any recycling action. If you set it a little bit higher, at the 'waist' on the can, the water will practically touch the joint at rest. At this water level, you can get recycling action, but I still feel you have to pull too hard. When it does recycle, it does vortex down nicely and quickly, though. Even without much recycling action during the hit, it does hit rather nice. I'm unsure about this one, I may keep it, may sell it.
9qmAu9Yl.jpg

TL;DR: IDK about this one. Functions 6/10, but still hits nice.
 
Last edited:

Erwin

Well-Known Member
Any opions on the FC711 (mini pillar)?? The only thing i don't like is the sidecar mouthpeice. The FC1000 it just looks so large for vapor..

The Binary matrix video was uploaded. Still wondering when it will be for sale..
This actually really bums me out. I've been excited about the binary matrix since it was first released by Mobius, and waiting for the inevitable Chinese knockoff to come around, but I really wish they weren't knocking off the aesthetic of the piece too. Largely because, as much as I have been a Mobius fan for a while I really hate the overall look of the new line. But also because I feel like there's a difference between copying form and copying function. As soon as you start adding flairs to imitate Mobius' style it seems like much more of a straight knockoff to me. I want to be getting a piece that gives me the function of a Mobius design, but I don't necessarily want to buy a poor imitation of his aesthetic. I'd much prefer the perc in a simple straight can, without the additional flair around the top of the can and weird looking mouthpiece. Just my :2c:
 
This actually really bums me out. I've been excited about the binary matrix since it was first released by Mobius, and waiting for the inevitable Chinese knockoff to come around, but I really wish they weren't knocking off the aesthetic of the piece too. Largely because, as much as I have been a Mobius fan for a while I really hate the overall look of the new line. But also because I feel like there's a difference between copying form and copying function. As soon as you start adding flairs to imitate Mobius' style it seems like much more of a straight knockoff to me. I want to be getting a piece that gives me the function of a Mobius design, but I don't necessarily want to buy a poor imitation of his aesthetic. I'd much prefer the perc in a simple straight can, without the additional flair around the top of the can and weird looking mouthpiece. Just my :2c:
Scientific glass - function should come first! And it should look as generic as all get out.
 
Top Bottom