I meant your last post/quote because your response to what you were replying to was included into the that quote, wasnt talking about the one where you mentioned receiving the Blue Ti...
I think he meant that you entered your response inside the quote box in error ...not that you should restate or defend your position or comments.
Has anyone here obtained any de-facto scientific testing results prior to acquiring any of the vapes listed in your signatures, or do you rely on anecdotal reviews just like 99.9% of we end users do? Thanks!
I concur. Every vape I own can get me extremely high.
Okay grammar police, so based on my anecdotes not experiments, I would say yes, the Ti is cooler to the touch. The SS gets hotter and cools down slower. Sure probably two SS may extract terpenes differently for example its dial not a super precise so one could inadverntly thought it was the "same" temperature when in fact one was at just slightly different temp and the temp the a particular terp of other compound vapes. That said the temps were on the dials and it was literally the same bud, not even a different bud from the same plant, literally the same bud. But as I did specifically mention, I'm not a scientist. One thing people do need to really wrap their heads around is, this device may not be for YOU for any number of reasons. The one valid question everyone seems to have is "Is this a high quality product?" The answer is an unqualified yes.
You may like the experience you may hate it but this device should be on everyone's list when thinking about which vape to purchase. If this were my first vape it would be my only and as I said before I anecdotally have only been using the GH, I used my Firefly once to compare flavor about a week ago and I use my pax2 exclusively for spliffs. But I'm in Boulder after all so perhaps I can find a scientist to do an actual experiment and determine if I actually think GH is AWESOME
Also for all the persistent non believers, hasn't anyone notice how every post I write about the GH is clearly written by someone who is extremely high? Typos everywhere, rambling "narrative" random tangents, whole paragraphs about nothing ...
What more proof do you need, I could have said this thing was awful and the evidence of how clearly high I am would clear that right up
Sure, the difference I was pointing out in that was that for the effect I would get from an ENTIRE BOWL in a pax2 I got from a pinch in the GH. Again no experiments, no scales, just looking at the amount in a pax and h about it takes to get the same effect in a GH and this simple country lobbyist doesn't need a scale or a scientist to know those to amounts are NOT the same, that one is substantially and outside a margin of error smaller. I posted a pic comparing pax2 and GH ABV. I actually use less than that amount now, the efficiency of this thing is crazy. Now that the "new toy" phase is slowly wearing off and I'm defaulting to how I would normally use it I find I am reaching for my vape less often than other vapes and definitely using a lot less cannabis. And to be clear for those looking for the non existent hidden criticism, this is because I just don't want to vape more, feel as high as I'd like and when I do grab the GH I use as little as I can so I can have more tasty hits, like I said a fully packed bowl, I could never finish in one sitting and even though it's pure convection and really does NOT cook herbs between hits, I don't see the point in a stale begone dull care hit in an hour when. can just finish the pinch, dump it out and have a nice clean GH for a fresh green pinch in an hour.
Okay grammar police, so based on my anecdotes not experiments, I would say yes, the Ti is cooler to the touch. The SS gets hotter and cools down slower. Sure probably two SS may extract terpenes differently for example its dial not a super precise so one could inadverntly thought it was the "same" temperature when in fact one was at just slightly different temp and the temp the a particular terp of other compound vapes. That said the temps were on the dials and it was literally the same bud, not even a different bud from the same plant, literally the same bud. But as I did specifically mention, I'm not a scientist. One thing people do need to really wrap their heads around is, this device may not be for YOU for any number of reasons. The one valid question everyone seems to have is "Is this a high quality product?" The answer is an unqualified yes.
You may like the experience you may hate it but this device should be on everyone's list when thinking about which vape to purchase. If this were my first vape it would be my only and as I said before I anecdotally have only been using the GH, I used my Firefly once to compare flavor about a week ago and I use my pax2 exclusively for spliffs. But I'm in Boulder after all so perhaps I can find a scientist to do an actual experiment and determine if I actually think GH is AWESOME
Also for all the persistent non believers, hasn't anyone notice how every post I write about the GH is clearly written by someone who is extremely high? Typos everywhere, rambling "narrative" random tangents, whole paragraphs about nothing ...
What more proof do you need, I could have said this thing was awful and the evidence of how clearly high I am would clear that right up
What more proof do you ntrieeed, I could have said this thing was awful and the evidence of how clearly high I am would clear that right up
