You are pushing me over the edge!!!
Sounds like you have found a winning combo!!
Well, you will see for yourself next weekend! I love it, but it has its moments. You can take the abv too far even when it's still very light brown/dark yellow and get unpleasant taste. Or don't get the timing of the inhale speed correctly and get an unpleasant tasting dark spot. But i've recently become both a flavour and airflow snob. This is why I love the lsv so much, but there is a user learning curve, and i'm definitely still learning...it's back to "basics" of vaporizing, where airflow controls so much of the temp. Pros/cons forsure, especially when compared to something like say, the Herbie. Then again we're talking about a vape that costs 1/4 of Herbie.
Can people with both units tell me your experience (or have tried both). At this price point, it seems that the lsv is the best bang for the buck. I was thinking evo and Herbalizer but wanted to transition my way in. I was really set on the evo, but at that price point, I might steer away (esp if the lsv kicks ass). I definitely want the herbalizer for the speed of the heat up, precise temp, and never tried a ballon before.
I've owned them all. If money was absolutely no object, Herbie would be my first choice. If it is, LSV. Otherwise, I like the e-nano alot, and would get it over the EVO. I just much prefer the LSV for so many reasons.
For me it's the nano for small bowl, the LSV for any size bowl I feel like, big or small.
Bang on. I have vaped a fragment of a bud, or leaf for that matter using an ELB/m2m with the lsv.
For full throttle, open rips I crank up the LSV. It has replaced the Cloud for that purpose.
It's nice to hear that i'm not the only one. If I only knew what I know now, back when this was released but all of the hype was on vxl, I would have purchased an LSV waaaaaay sooner.
But the LSV can very effectively vaporize small loads, especially when using a Q basket in an M2M through water so is there anything that the Nano really does better than the LSV that would make it a good idea to own both?
Personal preference and/or disposable income. As the present owner of both, but rookie in the LSV world, I still think i've put it through enough to form a fairly solid opinion. The results lie in the classifieds. Nuff said.
Are you implying that the lsv has the efficiency of the enano?that's what it sounds like. Is that true? Anyone else care to chime in
Yeah i'll chime in. It's true. I stick an ELB in a m2m and place ANY amount on top of it...literally ANY amount, even a speck can be successfully vaped and produce a visible cloud. Pretty sick from an efficiency standpoint i'd say. I know the nano can do the same, but the point is the LSV is just as efficient. I tested the shit out of this yesterday for hours. It was awesome!
Straight out-of-the-box, the e-nano is hands down the more efficient vaporizer.
With some modding, they are too close to call IMO.
Bingo.
. Every SSV heater cover works with the LSV. Too bad the SGG are the opposite, if the SSV SGG HC where male it would be a killer combo with the LSV WPA.