Discontinued Daisy vaporizer by Triihouse

Mister G

Mister G

Deceptively Old Fart
Mister G said:
They tweeted this picture last November...

B2Vb9UhCMAAMpYX.jpg:large
Click to expand...

I'm masterquoting again, feels so dirty, anyways, at first when I posted this pic I thought maybe it was a trumpeted, no wood mp for the Daisy, and maybe it still is, but it could also be a new bent heat intake for Lilly, maybe the bent design makes the whistle/turbo easier to achieve. It could also be the Loch Ness Monster. :tinfoil:

That's right, until we have the real thing, I'm going to speculate.

@Check that description of Lilly sounds just wonderful. Let the lust begin. :evil:
 
Check

Check

Well-Known Member
Mister G said:
I'm masterquoting again, feels so dirty, anyways, at first when I posted this pic I thought maybe it was a trumpeted, no wood mp for the Daisy, and maybe it still is, but it could also be a new bent heat intake for Lilly, maybe the bent design makes the whistle/turbo easier to achieve. It could also be the Loch Ness Monster. :tinfoil:

That's right, until we have the real thing, I'm going to speculate.

@Check that description of Lilly sounds just wonderful. Let the lust begin. :evil:
Click to expand...
The piece you see in the pic is the piece I was referring to as the one that stores inside lily. Its actually the intake stem for the flame.
 
Tom Funk

Tom Funk

Well-Known Member
Stu said:
It ain't gonna make itself! ;)

:peace:
Click to expand...

I can start a thread or @Check can. I did email Tommy to ask what he would like. I always think it looks nice if the manufacturer has first post - plus Lily is not officially on the market yet. The wording of Tommy's note to me suggests that this is not just a prototype though.

What do you think, @Check?

For those wondering, from my very limited experience, I do prefer Daisy but there will be places that Daisy can't go. That is where Lily will shine.

I'm 99% sure Tommy would be cool with me posting some photos but I'll just wait a bit longer for a response from him.
 
Check

Check

Well-Known Member
You got me there, I haven't a clue. Not really going to say yay or nay on the one, as I really don't know. It may not be a big deal, but at the same time I wouldn't want him to feel like his nice gesture of letting us try it out beforehand backfired on him. Hate to punish a manufacturer for being generous.
 
Tom Funk

Tom Funk

Well-Known Member
I just went back into my emails to check for a response from Tommy and found one from him from the wee hours of this morning (my time) asking me not to mention Lily. Whoops.

In my defence, the note from Tommy that came with the package as well as the email with instructions for Lily didn't imply anything about keeping her secret.

I won't post any more about her until we hear from Tommy, except to reiterate that this is an exceptional vape, but I prefer Daisy where pocketability is not needed. I am quite confidant that this opinion will last and will be shared by most others.

If you are in the market for Daisy you clearly don't need pocketability, so just go ahead and get her. If you are not convinced yet, go back and read through this whole thread. You will be!
 
t-dub

t-dub

Vapor Sloth
Looks like the store is live. One Lily, in walnut, incoming . . . :tup:

Edit: Got some of the walnut and beeswax butter as well . . . :)

Edit Edit: Apparently his item is included with each new vaporizer now . . . :D
264168300.jpg
 
Last edited:
RUDE BOY

RUDE BOY

Space is the Place
Right on time. Hoping I'll be able to have a new Lily for my B'Day in a few weeks. :rockon:

Daisy Looks like she's all grown up and got some curves now too, Both are looking sweet.
 
Last edited:
mixchu69

mixchu69

Well-Known Member
i think i need to get the daisy first. i probably need some pratice. and i like big bowls on my vape.
 
mixchu69,
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Funk
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom