the Michael Brown thread

mestizo

Well-Known Member
The grand jury will have blood in their hands if anybody dies as a result of this decision.

Edit: at least nine votes were required from the grand jury of nine whites, and three blacks.
Uh mm?
 

MinnBobber

Well-Known Member
None of us have seen all the evidence like the grand jury has, so opinions expressed here are pure speculation as to what happened.
They sat thru 25 days of evidence, testimony, autopsy findings etc. We didn't
 

Caligula

Maximus
Injustice = free booze and cigarettes. Seems legit. What was that... 30 minutes? It's my Korean friends store in LA circa 1992 all over again. Its shocking.

iEm3N7B.jpg
 
Last edited:

mestizo

Well-Known Member
Does anybody think the jury's decision would have been the same if the race of the jurors would have been reversed, nine blacks and three whites, regardless of evidence presented?
Remember the trial of the white officers who beat up Rodney King?
White jury=not guilty.
OJ trial, black majority jury=not guilty.
Do you guys really think jurors are color blind, or faultless?

Just like people vote along party lines, a lot of jurors vote along color lines regardless of evidence.
 

mestizo

Well-Known Member

Newcastle

Stoned!
NO....when you draw a gun it's to kill! Shooting to injure is for the movies. It's not reality.
I don't know who "taught" you but I was always told don't stop shooting until your out of bullets. If it comes to shooting it's all or none!.... I am not an officer of the law. I do have over 30 years of safe gun handling.
 

KidFated.

Unknown Member
Straight from my booklet. FWIW

In terms of time, one can use force only for as long as the threat remains imminent (that is, until it is neutralized). If it takes 5 shots to do that, but 6 are fired, that 6th round is excessive force and does not qualify for justification as self-defense.

@Newcastle your regulations must differ, we just renewed ours as a family not too long ago.
 
Top Bottom