If the fattest-hitting vape you've used was rated 10/10, how would other vapes you've used rate ?
- Thread starter Qbit
- Start date
CountVapeula
Well-Known Member
you got me wrong. i prefer the solo over any other portable vape i own but it's only my first choice, while not at home. compared to the stationary units like the dbv,vhw,ssv, etc the solo is no real competition in terms of "fat-hitting", to me. but still better hitting than the v-tower i had or the other portables i mentioned. for me it's like this: when i want to vape a small amount and get a big hit i use the ssv+miniwand. for bigger amounts and even bigger hits at home i use the vhw. for small amount at home, in a comfortable setting, i use the solo some times. the volcano gets rarely used, mostly for other herbs like camomile or sage, when i'm sick or for group-sessions, after a good cleaning and a new bag of course.
OO
Technical Skeptical
Vapor to air ratio has little to do with the vape used, in fact most are comparable.
Factors that affect this ratio are quality of what is packed, vaping temperature, draw speed, surface area, and a slew of other variables, before the vape ever is taken into account.
I'm sorry, but I still don't see the point.
Factors that affect this ratio are quality of what is packed, vaping temperature, draw speed, surface area, and a slew of other variables, before the vape ever is taken into account.
I'm sorry, but I still don't see the point.
vorrange
Vapor.wise
That could be nitpicking, although i see your point. I think it is fair to assume that people can tell between different kinds of quality and grind consistency, humidity, etc.. especially since people are comparing their own vaporizers by atributing a grade to the best and evaluating IN COMPARISON, and not in absolute values.
The truth is that you can tell a lot by thickness of vapor, although the bowl volume is obviously affecting the results in terms of vapor to air ratio.
OO
Technical Skeptical
Yes, some other factors include heat retention, and how thoroughly the air is heated, but there's really too many factors that are user affected to make this information even somewhat valuable.
I really think this is a poor thread, I mean evaluating something definable makes sense, but this is just a "what's your favorite vape thread".
I don't see the point of this.
momatik
Well-Known Member
I disagree with this statement having read it literally. This kind of information can be somewhat valuable to newbies. Sure there are many factors, but there is also something to be said about the relative performance of different vaporizers after having sampled a variety of strains.
How the user decides to use the vaporizer changes things. But I think that in this case we are assuming that the user is coming from a combustion background and is looking to vape in a way that will most satisfy ex-smokers.
Wolf46
Vapor War Team Cap
cristal clear!
Qbit
cannabanana
Thanks for your list, but which Vapir product are you talking about? Vapir is the name of the company, not an actual vape.
lost nebula
Always Vaping
I'm pretty sure he meant the Vapir Air One 5.0, he included the model number but not the model.
OO
Technical Skeptical
If that is the case, not only should visual clouds be a focus, but also the 'X-factor', the immediate head change that some vapes can give with ease, and is reminiscent of the immediate satiation that combusting brings to the table.
Qbit
cannabanana
OK so I've entered almost all the data from your answers here (some vapes are missing):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Al3wiRc9rCx9dFBYMzZHZlREaGNvRWdmdzNNYTMtaUE&output=html
I've rearranged the rows and columns so that more data is in the top left of the chart.
But I've realised now that I not quite sure how to process it. It's not as simple as just finding averages. I'll see if I can come up with a reasonable method, but if there's anyone out there who might have more of a clue, I'm all ears.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Al3wiRc9rCx9dFBYMzZHZlREaGNvRWdmdzNNYTMtaUE&output=html
I've rearranged the rows and columns so that more data is in the top left of the chart.
But I've realised now that I not quite sure how to process it. It's not as simple as just finding averages. I'll see if I can come up with a reasonable method, but if there's anyone out there who might have more of a clue, I'm all ears.
Abysmal Vapor
Supersniffer 2000 - robot fart detection device
1.Underdog 10
2.Wychwood 9.5
3. Magic Wand 9
4.Gnome gong 8.5
5 DBV/ssv/lsv gong - 8
6. Metal Vapo BOwl/GLass Vapo bowl /Gnome classic- 7.5
7. Vapocane - 7
8: Vaporgenie classic - 6.5
9: MFLB - 5.5
2.Wychwood 9.5
3. Magic Wand 9
4.Gnome gong 8.5
5 DBV/ssv/lsv gong - 8
6. Metal Vapo BOwl/GLass Vapo bowl /Gnome classic- 7.5
7. Vapocane - 7
8: Vaporgenie classic - 6.5
9: MFLB - 5.5
lazylathe
Almost there...
The only vape i have and use for now is the Vapir NO2.
I would have rated it about a 7 for the first few weeks of use.
Now 6 months later is gets a solid 4.
It's efficiency has dropped for me using it either portable or with the wall charger.
Waiting on my E-Nano and i am hoping it will be a 10!
IMO i think this is a FUN thread!
Not scientific at all, just personal experience and preferences!
Nice to know what others think about their vapes and how they rate them.
There are way too many variables for this thread to be scientific in any shape or form.
Keep them coming!!
I would have rated it about a 7 for the first few weeks of use.
Now 6 months later is gets a solid 4.
It's efficiency has dropped for me using it either portable or with the wall charger.
Waiting on my E-Nano and i am hoping it will be a 10!
IMO i think this is a FUN thread!
Not scientific at all, just personal experience and preferences!
Nice to know what others think about their vapes and how they rate them.
There are way too many variables for this thread to be scientific in any shape or form.
Keep them coming!!
3serieSensi
Well-Known Member
i think to get a milky cloudy vapor exp from the Volcano with only a tiny amount of herb you just need to modulate it and such. It can be done, but since the Volcano CAN be so simply, people usually think it must remain so. But you can fiddle some milk out yet. Wonder how the Volcano with a whip would score.
OO
Technical Skeptical
This is exactly what I tried to state earlier, other factors are more important.
Cloud - 11
Solo - 9
Aromed - 7
DBV - 8
SSV - 8
VM2 - 5
MFLB - 3
Iolite - 4
VG - 4.5
No2 - 6
OxygenMini - 3
vapir 5.0 - 1
Volcano Digi - 7 (im being leanient because it deserved to be grandfathered in)
EXQ - 7
Vape or Smoke - 1
UD - 8
Evaap - 3
LSV - 8
Ubie - 1
TV - 5
Vrip - 7
Old School Hot Box - 3
Davinci - 7
Wispr - 4.5
Solo - 9
Aromed - 7
DBV - 8
SSV - 8
VM2 - 5
MFLB - 3
Iolite - 4
VG - 4.5
No2 - 6
OxygenMini - 3
vapir 5.0 - 1
Volcano Digi - 7 (im being leanient because it deserved to be grandfathered in)
EXQ - 7
Vape or Smoke - 1
UD - 8
Evaap - 3
LSV - 8
Ubie - 1
TV - 5
Vrip - 7
Old School Hot Box - 3
Davinci - 7
Wispr - 4.5
Dr. Yan-I-Tor
12 stories tall made of radiation
Cloud -10.5
LSV-10
FV-8
Solo-9
EQ-8
VG Classic - 9
Pax- 7
And actually that turns out to be how I'd rank these vapes in regard to taste too.
LSV-10
FV-8
Solo-9
EQ-8
VG Classic - 9
Pax- 7
And actually that turns out to be how I'd rank these vapes in regard to taste too.
goatgobaahh
Well-Known Member
What mods have you done to the extreme Q that give you that extra 1 point?