VaporGenie

VaporGenie

Well-Known Member
Manufacturer
Hello

This is Dan from Vaporgenie.

We dont monitor this thread (or any other thread). We are happy to respond to questions, but we need to be alerted by email or through our website. So in the future dont hesitate to contact us via our website if you want us to respond.

So there were some questions about silicon carbide. The folks at Alivi8 stated the following:

"It has been brought to my attention that vaporgenie have been making posts
insinuating there may be health issues relating to the metal foam filters in the Alivi8,
having spoke with the manufacturers of the FeCrAlY filters I am assured
the material is perfectly safe for use in this particular application,
unfortunately it can not be said the same with this competitors Silicon Carbide filter,
when exposed to temps as low as 1200C Silicon carbide can produce SiO2 (silicon oxide)
Cristobalite which is a known CANCER CAUSING AGENT if ingested or inhaled.
the unique tortuous path design taken by the vapor in the Alivi8 enhances and cools
the vapors flavour and creates a sticky trap for any potential material passing through the system,
the same can not be said for the straight through designs of the Vaporgenie,
any loose particles will be inhaled and ingested."

Here are the facts:
Silicon carbide forms an extremely thin, adherent silicon dioxide (SiO2, silica) layer when heated. This is called a "passivation" layer because it protects the underlying material. Silicon dioxide is the main component of borosilicate glass (pyrex). This silica layer is sticks to the silicon carbide and does not produce particles.

Silicon carbide is typically rated for continuous use in air up to about 1650C. This means that at temperatures below 1650C, the rate of oxidation is essentially zero after the passivation layer is formed. I dont know where the 1200C figure came from, but I assume that this is the temperature at which the silica passivation layer is first formed. But this does not mean that silicon carbide will form silica particles at 1200C. It just means that this is the temperature at which the oxide passivation layer first forms.

Silica dust, like virtually any other type of fine dust, is harmful to the lungs. It can cause silicosis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicosis Silicosis is an occupational illness caused by working in very dusty environments. One must inhale significant amounts of silica dust to cause silicosis.

The VaporGenie silicon carbide filter will not produce silica particles or any other type of particles and so cannot possibly cause silicosis or produce any other particles.

The "christobalite" referred to by Alivi8 is a particular type of silica. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silica I dont see any reason to assume that the passivation layer formed on silicon carbide is "christobalite", and even if it was, it is extremely thin and strongly adherent to the silicon carbide. There is no reason to be concerned about the silica passivation layer on silicon carbide any more than being concerned about ordinary glass or borosilicate glass.

Inhaling virtually any type of ceramic powder or dust material is harmful to the lungs. That is why the silicon carbide filter in the VaporGenie is made of monolithic silicon carbide created by chemical vapor deposition. Other, cheaper ceramics are typically made by sintering ceramic particles. These ceramic materials present a hazard of particle inhalation because the ceramic particles can break off. This does not happen with the monolithic silicon carbide in the VaporGenie. The VaporGenie ceramic filter is not made of sintered particles for this reason.

Also, the SIZE of the particles is very important. The smaller the particles, the more harmful they are to the lungs. The most dangerous particles are sub-micron size. Thats because these small particles are not collected by upper air passages in the lungs, but instead they go all the way into the tiny chambers of the lungs where air exchange occurs. So, large, dust-like particles are not dangerous (they are easily filtered out by the lungs), but microscopic, sub-micron particles are dangerous. Very fine submicron particles are difficult to filter from air. If the FeCrAl filter is creating these fine particles, they absolutely will NOT be removed by the serpentine path used in the Alivi8.

The particular silicon carbide used in the VaporGenie filter is rated for use in air up to 1650C. A butane lighter cannot even come close to this temperature (e.g. 1200-1300C absolute max). A butane lighter cannot heat the ceramic to 1200C because the silicon carbide has a high thermal conductivity and the foam filaments are relatively thick. The FeCrAl material, by comparison, has very thin filaments, which are much more easily heated to the full temperature of the lighter flame.

FeCrAl alloys, by comparison, are rated for use in air up to 950-1400C. http://www.alloysino.com/FeCrAl_resistance_heating_alloy.html Only the more exotic alloys (containing niobium or molybdenum) can go to 1300 or 1400 C. The FeCrAl alloys can experience oxidation fast enough to degrade the material at temperatures as low s 950C. I have no idea what type of alloy the Alivi8 uses. If the folks at Alivi8 want to continue this discussion, they should indicate precisely which alloy they are using and indicate its maximum continuous use temperature.

Typically what happens with metals above the max use temperature is that the metal is consumed and particles are produced. Particles are produced because the metal oxides formed are not adherent. This is what happens for example when a light bulb filament is exposed to air. The metal burns up into a puff of metal oxide particle smoke.

What I personally experienced with the FeCrAl materials was a worrisome level of oxidation and metal fume production. This is one of the reasons why we chose not to use them. I do not recall the exact alloy I experimented with. It could have been one of the FeCrAl alloys with a max temp rating of only 950C. The Alivi8 might use a better allot for all I know.

What has happened here is that the folks at Alivi8 have fished around for something scary to say about silicon carbide. They didnt find anything worth worrying about. Silicon carbide is extremely heat resistant and chemically stable. It does not produce particles when heated. It slowly forms a very stable and adherent passivation layer of silicon dioxide on its surface when heated.

One more thing: SURFACE OXIDE PASSIVATION LAYERS ARE VISIBLE. If they are thick enough, they can be seen with the unaided eye, on metals OR silicon carbide. They appear as sheen-like color variations or rainbow colors. When oxidation occurs, the colors will shift around and change. I have personally observed these colors changing and shifting around on the Alivi8 filter, which of course indicates a significant level of oxidation and chemical reaction of the metal. By comparison, no such colors will be formed on silicon carbide by the same butane flame. The silicon carbide is much more stable and resistant to oxidation than FeCrAl alloys.

There IS an issue worth worrying about regarding lighters: the dust produced by flint lighters. The lighter flint material is made of misch metal, a mixture of rare earth elements (lanthanum, cerium, neodymium etc). When you strike a flint lighter, the misch metal is burned, producing very fine inhalable particles (i expect they are sub-micron in view of their blue-ish, smoke-like appearance). As I noted above, fine particles are hazardous. Also, the misch metals are chemically toxic. So its sort of a double-whammy. There is an interesting downloadable scientific paper about the pulmonary toxicity of rare earth metals on our website:
http://www.vaporgenie.com/component/option,com_fjrelated/Itemid,35/id,80/layout,blog/view,fjrelated/

Here is the paper:
https://www.vaporgenie.com/images/flint_dust.pdf
 
VaporGenie,
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff-K

J.R.R.Tokin'

Wych Doctor
Manufacturer
Wow, that was a very detailed and scientific response. I guess like a lot of people I take it for granted that companies are going to release a healthy product and test it rigorously before release. You've obviously gone to a lot of effort in selecting your materials for the VG and I guess that shows in it's quality and popularity.

On a side note - I love my VG Coil - I've got a bit of an obsession with stripping it down into it's component parts and reassembling it. I think if we were allowed guns in the UK I'd be trying to disassemble and reassemble blindfolded - and yes I have tried it with the VG Coil blindfolded successfully!

Any new vaporizer products near completion or in development from VG Dan?
 
J.R.R.Tokin',

VaporGenie

Well-Known Member
Manufacturer
We put a lot of thought into the materials we use in our pipes. We make every effort to select only safe materials.

Here is an example of a material we DO NOT use: colored plywood laminates. We have had a few requests from customers interested in these materials. And we have received a number of offers from colored plywood laminate suppliers. But we have never made a pipe out of these materials, despite the fact that they are widely used in smoking pipes. We just dont think they are safe. The color dyes have an unknown toxicity and its possible they could outgas significantly. The manufacturers have generally been unable to tell us what these dyes are. And since the wood is a plywood material, its saturated with glue. Its a terrible idea to put glue in the hot air flow path of a smoking or vaporizing pipe. So thats why we have never made a pipe with the colored laminate materials.

We are working on some new stuff. Its too early for us to make any kind of announcement because the designs keep changing.

We are interested in hearing what our customers would like us to develop.
 
VaporGenie,

Stu

Maconheiro
Staff member
VaporGenie said:
We are interested in hearing what our customers would like us to develop.

I'd love to see a simple VG GonG unit. I use my VG Coil exclusively in my bong, and although the Coil doesn't form an airtight seal with my glass, it's enough to get really big cloudy rips. I'm sure if a VG diffuser attached to a simple male GonG joint, it would be even better.

:2c:
 

J.R.R.Tokin'

Wych Doctor
Manufacturer
I like that idea Stu. Just a thought about bong and Coil. What about getting a large diameter piece of silicone tube to make a collar at the gong joint to make a seal?

As to products I would like to see...hmmm...ok, what about exotic wood VG's, for the more discerning gentleman...or a limited edition Sherlock Holmes style VG...and anything else with the Coil material (seriously obsessed with the stuff).
 
J.R.R.Tokin',

Stu

Maconheiro
Staff member
J.R.R.Tokin' said:
I like that idea Stu. Just a thought about bong and Coil. What about getting a large diameter piece of silicone tube to make a collar at the gong joint to make a seal?
Because it's not worth it IMO. It'd be ugly and I like the simplicity of just dropping my coil into my glass. Or maybe I'm just lazy. :ko:
 
Stu,

SD_haze

Well-Known Member
J.R.R.Tokin' wrote:
I like that idea Stu. Just a thought about bong and Coil. What about getting a large diameter piece of silicone tube to make a collar at the gong joint to make a seal?

We do that at my friend's place so we can use a non glass-on-glass bong with the coil with ease.

I also would love to see a VG with a scientific GonG fitting.
 

OF

Well-Known Member
J.R.R.Tokin' said:
Wow, that was a very detailed and scientific response. I guess like a lot of people I take it for granted that companies are going to release a healthy product and test it rigorously before release. You've obviously gone to a lot of effort in selecting your materials for the VG and I guess that shows in it's quality and popularity.

Excellent point, no FDA here. While we all hope makers are looking out for us, it's indeed gratifying to read of the efforts taken with the VG, this might be just the time to stop and reflect this is not always the case. Specifically we know the cheap Chinese clone of the VG not only doesn't seem to have this level of concern for our health but has been shown to actually contain poison in the form of lead paint. Good show there's no heat involved, or folks putting stuff in the mouth or anything......

Makes it easier to support such a maker (at least to me), I have several different models and enjoy them for this very reason (as well as the usual ones.....they simply do the job). To me, the PD fits in for the same reasons. As do several others.

Thanks for 'going the extra mile' on my behalf.

OF
 
OF,

VaporGenie

Well-Known Member
Manufacturer
OK so you guys seem to like the coil concept. Thats nice to know. The coil pipes are great because they have excellent performance at lot cost. And they are stainless steel. Before we came up with the coil idea, we only had 3 ways to make stuff out of stainless: machining, casting or stamping. All 3 methods are very expensive. Coiling is the only way to make cheap pipes out of stainless.

We cannot make any bong attachments because of legal liability. VG is not in the bong business.

Thanks for the suggestions. We will work on some new coil pipe concepts.
 
VaporGenie,

lwien

Well-Known Member
Hey Dan. Just want to give you a major thumbs up. The VG was my very first vape about 3 years ago and it was such a good experience that combustion is now a thing of the past for me.

Much, MUCH appreciated. :tup:
 

AGBeer

Lost in Thought
Stu said:
VaporGenie said:
We are interested in hearing what our customers would like us to develop.

I'd love to see a simple VG GonG unit. I use my VG Coil exclusively in my bong, and although the Coil doesn't form an airtight seal with my glass, it's enough to get really big cloudy rips. I'm sure if a VG diffuser attached to a simple male GonG joint, it would be even better.

:2c:

This... That would be awesome Stu :D


But if you could have the stone set appx the same distance as it is in the SS Coil vs the Classic.

I have found that the greater distance to the stone from the heat source makes combustion a bit more difficult. :2c:
 
AGBeer,

OF

Well-Known Member
lwien said:
Just want to give you a major thumbs up. The VG was my very first vape about 3 years ago and it was such a good experience that combustion is now a thing of the past for me.

It was my "gateway vape" as well back in the dark days. It too was responsible for my dumping combustion, as such it has a special status with me.

Great product, from great people. I like that.

OF
 
OF,

Egzoset

Banned
Hi Dan,

Egzoset said:
Are there any chances we can get details from VaporGenie (Dan) relatively to "lab tests" or whatever after his intervention in the Alivi8 thread?

VaporGenie said:
I hope that answers everyones questions!

Thank you for passing by. I do have another question on my mind but asking about it here wouldn't be appropriate.

:peace:
 
Egzoset,

hogleg

Well-Known Member
I would like to see a larger vaporgenie. The bowl and ceramic to be a bigger hole, the pipe would not change much but accommodate the larger insert and top. Torche lighters are my regular way of heating and it would be nice to have a larger surface and larger clouds. I have been using VGs for over 4 yrs and love them it seems I always come back to them no matter what new fancy device Ive just gotten
 
hogleg,

Foster

Well-Known Member
I own a VG Aluminum Bat, and am kind of 50/50 on it. I am looking to buy another VG, and was going to order a handcarved one online, when i found out that my LHS has like every color of class VGs.

My question is: Is the classic just as good of a vape as the hand carved? Are there really any differences?
 
Foster,

paytonpenn

Level 30 Nature/Healer
Foster said:
My question is: Is the classic just as good of a vape as the hand carved? Are there really any differences?
I personally recommend the HC versions over the classics, owning both I prefer my HC model. I don't know if there is difference on the new filter's when in comparison to the HC and classic models. But my HC model has a deeper filter than the classic model I bought last year on Christmas Eve. The bowl is also bigger on the Hardcarved version and I like how it looks and feels. Whenever I vape with it I feel very classy, and maybe its just me but I feel I little buttery smooth taste on my hits with tastastic herbs. (By that I mean the vapor feels kind of buttery and tastes very smooth, not taste buttery, though I suppose with the feeling you kind of hallucinate the taste, possibly. A hint of it)

EDIT:
Also, I don't use the VG bases anymore, I just use the filters on bongs. Will post video soon. But my walnut spiral top gets more action than the classic because of the difficulty of burning the filter with new people. And the ability to adjust the height better.
 
paytonpenn,

Albert Hofmann

Convicted vapist
Foster said:
I own a VG Aluminum Bat, and am kind of 50/50 on it. I am looking to buy another VG, and was going to order a handcarved one online, when i found out that my LHS has like every color of class VGs.

My question is: Is the classic just as good of a vape as the hand carved? Are there really any differences?
Well, I have 4 vaporgenies. A classic, a hand carved, an aluminum bat, and an aluminum pipe. I haven't used the classic for a very long time. With the handcarved and the aluminum pipes, the bowl is sunk into the body of the pipe, so the top of the flame filter is at a comfortable height. With the classic, the bowl sits on top of the pipe body, so the top of the flame filter feels unnaturally high up(to me anyway). So between the classic and the handcarved, I bet you'd be happier with a handcarved. But personally, I use my regular aluminum pipe more than any of em. I just absolutely love that thing.
 
Albert Hofmann,

yazzay

Member
Hi all,

Just diving into the forum after a few months of passionate reading. I went to vaporising 6 months ago after almost 20 years of an unbelivably stupid period of combusition. As it rapidely turned into a passion , I bought a NO2, quickly followed by MFLB, the eagle bill shake n vape thing, the Alivi8 and I just recevied my new arizer solo and vaporgenie classic 2 hours ago.

While the Solo gently charges his batteries, I am already able to give you feedback in the Alivi8 and VG comparison:

Alivi8 is a superb metal craft piece that I like to touch and watch. Everything is nicelly made. Watching & holding it gives a excellent feeling of quality. BUT, vaping with it is quite difficult. As metal temperature changes a lot, the learning curve is long and it remains difficult not to reach combusition. If mistake is done once, it kills the lungs. Temp can increase so suddenly that it is hard to notice it in time, and in addition to the lung pain, everything in the vapo gets glued with tar.

VG is not a so rewarding as a craft piece. BUT everything else is BETTER BY FAR than the alivi8. There we can feel not only a nice object, but something with a excellent design, allowing excellent operation and vaping experience. The air flow is amazing and is is very easy (even natural) not to burn anything. Heat can be very easily controlled.

So without really knowing which one is deadly or not... Simply for vaping experience : alivi8 is knocked out

And OK, English is NOT my mother tongue :rolleyes: :)
 
yazzay,

stickstones

Vapor concierge
^^^
thanks yazzay and welcome to the forum! try taking the mouthpiece out of your genie. I never use the mouthpiece since I removed it a long time ago.
 
stickstones,

stickstones

Vapor concierge
Dan...great post. But now I'm wondering if I should have a lighter technique that keeps me from inhaling the lighter dust.
 
stickstones,

stickstones

Vapor concierge
AGBeer (or anyone who has both)...do you like the coil better than the original VG? Looks like it would fit in the pocket better. Does it hit the same or different than the classic?
 
stickstones,

DevoTheStrange

Ia! Ia! Vapor Fthagn!
stickstones said:
AGBeer (or anyone who has both)...do you like the coil better than the original VG? Looks like it would fit in the pocket better. Does it hit the same or different than the classic?
I do not own both. Used to own a classic and a VGBat. But I have used my friends coil alot. Out of the three I would say I like the coil better. IMO the coil seems to hit a little stronger and quicker. By that I mean less time for the bowl to heat up and it gives seemingly bigger hits
 
DevoTheStrange,
Top Bottom