Cannabis News

cybrguy

Putin is a War Criminal
Demand grows for marijuana cultivation courses in Illinois
Posted 6:34 am, April 23, 2019, by WQAD Digital Team


CHICAGO (AP) — More colleges are beginning to offer classes in growing and handling marijuana as demand for such skills from growers and dispensaries increases.

Colleges and universities in Illinois are noticing the benefits of preparing students for the industry but that there are restrictions on how fast the schools can offer new programming, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Karen Midden, interim dean of the College of Agricultural Sciences at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale, said she receives near-daily inquiries about the school's cannabis program, and cultivators also call looking for students with expertise.

"People think it's some magical thing you have to learn to grow marijuana," Midden said. In reality, she said, the basic skills required to operate any greenhouse can be applied to cultivating cannabis in a greenhouse.

SIU in Carbondale plans to package existing classes with a couple of cannabis-focused courses for a 30-credit hour cannabis certificate program. That likely won't be available until the end of the year, Midden said.

Numerous Illinois marijuana cultivators are expanding their growing facilities with an eye on fulfilling the demands of a medical marijuana program that added more than 27,000 patients in the past year. Gov. J. B. Pritzker is also toying with the idea of legalizing recreational marijuana use in the state, which could further increase demand. Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, has been collaborating with other legislators to draft a legalization measure that they hope can get passed by May.

Oakton Community College in Des Plaines announced last month that it was launching a program to train students in working with medical marijuana patients.

Schools are launching cannabis courses or degree programs the nation over.

Northern Michigan University created a four-year medicinal plant chemistry degree in the fall of 2017. Twenty students joined in the first semester and enrollment jumped to 220 the following year.

Last fall, the University of California at Davis created a class about how cannabis compounds impact the human body. And last month, Oakton Community College in Des Plaines said it was launching a program that would train students in how to work with medical marijuana patients.

Additionally, marijuana law classes are becoming increasingly common, with courses being offered at schools in Colorado, Ohio and Chicago.
 
Last edited:

macbill

Oh No! Mr macbill!!
Staff member
Congress Will Hold A Hearing On Three Marijuana Bills Next Week
[A] House subcommittee has scheduled a hearing on Tuesday to discuss three cannabis bills focusing on military veterans.

The legislation up for consideration concerns veterans’ access to medical marijuana, expanding research on cannabis’s therapeutic value and protecting U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits for those using the drug in compliance with state law.
 

Summer

Long Island, NY
and protecting U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits for those using the drug in compliance with state law.
BS - Why don't they change the law at the federal level to protect vets regardless a legal or not state. :disgust: Federal trumps states. What they should be doing is investing their time in federal legalization.

$20M is a pittance for them in comparison to the profits they made on the drugs. Basically, they got to keep the profits. All for public show, while keeping the lobbying $ flowing.
 
Last edited:

cybrguy

Putin is a War Criminal
iiheader.jpg

Jaclyn Driscoll/NPR Illinois

As political negotiations on recreational marijuana continue, one prominent group, has not yet taken a stance: the Legislative Black Caucus. These are the African-American lawmakers in the Illinois House and Senate.

They are involved in the talks, though, according to state Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth, a Peoria Democrat and leader in the caucus.

“Any adult-use bill has to have specific consideration as it relates to restoring some of the harm that was done during the war on drugs to communities of color,” she said. “There should be ownership of people of color in this space.”

Gordon-Booth recognized that people will likely make millions of dollars off a drug that disproportionately harmed minority communities for decades, and she wants to ensure there’s equity in a recreational program.

“We don’t want an adult-use program to look like the medical program which essentially is completely and wholly owned by rich people and none of them are people of color,” Gordon-Booth said.

Illinois approved its medical marijuana pilot program back in 2013, and politicians tout it as one of the best, a model for the rest of the country. But it’s also a secretive one.

HCIAlt3.jpg



Chris Stone is the CEO of HCI Alternatives, a medical marijuana dispensary in Springfield and the Metro East. He did not remember all of the specifics of the application process, but he did say it was quite extensive.

According to documents from the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR), there were five required categories on the application for medical dispensaries. The categories included: suitability of the proposed dispensary, a business and operation plan, a security plan, record keeping and inventory plan, and financial disclosures.

“Each one of our applications was about 1,800 pages,” said Stone. “We had to provide, I believe, six or seven copies of that, but we also had to double the number of copies because we had to provide a clean copy and a redacted copy.”

IDFPR is in charge of the dispensary side of things. The Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDOA) is in charge of cultivation sites. Both departments say neither the full application or the redacted copies are available to the public. Stone mentioned he believed one of the reasons why he was required to redact copies was for Freedom of Information Act requests. But, NPR Illinois’ request was denied.

Stone said names and personal financial information had to be redacted, but wasn’t sure of the other elements.

“When they were reviewing applications they didn’t have the names of anybody in there to affect their judgement when scoring,” Stone said. “They would look at the redacted copy in terms of the scoring, but they had a clean copy to go with it.”

When Stone says “they” he means the people who essentially decided who got a license for a dispensary or a cultivation site. Sources say there were four people for the IDOA and four people for the IDFPR reviewing and scoring applications. But, who “they” are, again, is confidential according to both departments.

There are currently 55 dispensaries and 20 cultivation sites. There’s also no public state data keeping track of who is profiting from them.

For the proposed recreational program, it’s unclear at this time how many more licenses the state will approve. There are competing studies examining the demand for the product. Lawmakers say they want to be sure they are not “over saturating” the market with product, but they also don’t want to underproduce for patients who need it for medical reasons.

AlthoffFloor.jpg

Former state senator Pam Althoff speaking on the senate floor.

Pam Althoff, a former state legislator now with the Medical Cannabis Alliance of Illinois, said there’s no need to approve any new licenses in the first couple years because there’s already cultivation space not being used now.

“When they submitted to the state of Illinois, they had to submit what they ultimately were going to build out,” Althoff said. “But obviously the demand in the medical program was not as great as anticipated because we ran into some difficulties getting the program up and running appropriately so they’re not utilizing their entire square footage that was approved by the state of Illinois.”

State Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago) argues this isn’t the case, and there will need to be more licenses approved to keep up with demand. But she gave no indication as to how many the state is considering approving.

Still, many say they want a recreational marijuana program to be more transparent and open.

Sunshine Clemons, the founder of the Black Lives Matter group in Springfield, is one of them. She spoke on a personal level because BLM has not yet taken a stance either.

“You have to provide the steps to make things right for the communities you’ve hurt for all those years,” she said. “I believe that we can take the steps to do it where it can provide equity for the black and brown community that can be legislated. If we can do it that way, then I’m in support of it.”

Still, from a monetary standpoint, there could be a significant barrier. Gov. J.B. Pritzker has already estimated millions of dollars in next year’s budget from legalizing cannabis. That’s only counting the fees to get a license, which he’s suggesting will go for $100,000 each. That’s not counting the application fees and other expenses. For example, it cost $5,000 just to be able to hand in an application for the medical program.

In a statement, a spokesperson for Pritzker said: “The governor believes minority entrepreneurs must have the opportunity to succeed in a new adult-use cannabis industry and is exploring all options to ensure justice and equity are core elements of legalization. Stakeholders are currently negotiating the final bill language to uphold those principles, and we expect the legislation to be filed soon.”

The lead sponsors of the recreational marijuana legislation also say equity in the market is a top priority. State Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago) said this is an issue across the country that she hopes to find a solution for.

“First of all, doing the research,” she said. “Getting the lay of the land to see that across the country this industry is only about 4% minority owned. Getting a sense of what states have tried to do to fix for that and where those things have fallen short.”

As of now, details of how they’ll ensure this happens remain behind closed doors.
 

cybrguy

Putin is a War Criminal
Oh, I get what you meant and of course I agree that is one of the things that should be done. My point is only that something like that can't happen while cannabis is still a schedule 1 drug, and the first thing that has to happen federally is the taking cannabis off the schedule. Once off the schedule LOTS of good things can happen at the federal level along with letting states do what they want to do and letting banks service the industry so it can have a "real business model" instead of the haphazard and costly clusterfuck that it is now.
 

ClearBlueLou

unbearably light in the being....
I agree that rescheduling cannabis - and striking all other cannabis-control measures from the books, including the infamous Tax Act - is essential if were going to have sane rules and sensible, workable policies. The continued federal ambiguity mangles state-level efforts which seem to all try to be as ‘tough on legal dope’ as their BS prohibition stances.

This will not work long-term. Even Colorado’s regulatory scheme is extremely rigid and unforgiving, and seeks less to permit than to control.
 

cybrguy

Putin is a War Criminal
Illinois Lawmakers Near Completion of Cannabis Legalization Draft Bill
Formal legislation could be introduced next week.

May 1, 2019

Illinois lawmakers are in the final stages of the drafting process for legislation that would legalize adult-use cannabis in the state, and Chris Lindsey, senior legislative counsel for the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), said the draft bill will likely be circulated as soon as next week.

“Then that gives us a good chunk of the month of May to get it through the legislative process,” he told Cannabis Business Times.

While the Illinois legislature is active throughout the entire year, lawmakers stop meeting regularly in Springfield at the end of May, Lindsey said. He and other legalization advocates want to ensure that a bill can get through the legislative process—passing out of both chambers—before the end of the month.

Although the specifics of the bill are being kept under wraps until the draft bill is unveiled, Lindsey said the big picture hasn’t changed.

“We’re taking the existing medical cannabis system, using that as kind of our launching pad, … [and] modifying it in significant ways to get it calibrated for the adult-use market,” he said. “So, in that respect, it’s very similar to what we’ve seen in other states.”

What’s different, he added, is that lawmakers are drafting very detailed language that provides the state’s regulatory agencies with specific guidance on how to implement an adult-use cannabis market, as opposed to putting a measure in front of voters that then requires the legislature to roll out rules and regulations.

“Rather than have big picture issues put into the statute and then leave the rest to rules, a lot of those rules are actually incorporated into the statutes itself, into the act,” Lindsey said. “When you get agencies involved that are cooperative and want to make this work, then it really opens the discussion up in ways that I’ve not seen before. It’s been a very interesting process.”

That, he added, is why this legalization bill has been in the works for nearly two years. State Sen. Heather Steans (D-Chicago) and State Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago) are the main sponsors of the legislation, which is backed by MPP. The bill is based on language Steans’ Senate Bill 7, which will be amended to include the substantial language put forth in the upcoming draft bill.

RELATED: Illinois Lawmakers Consider Two Adult-Use Cannabis Legalization Proposals

The Senate Executive Committee passed Senate Bill 7 by a 12-4 vote in early April. Last week, Steans said in an interview for the Capitol Cast podcast by Capitol News Illinois that she hoped to file substantial language by the end of April or very early May.

Although negotiations are still happening behind closed doors, Lindsey did say that the legislation aims to create a fair and diverse adult-use market.

“When it comes to the sponsors, the lawmakers involved and the governor’s office, there is very strong interest in ensuring that the program will be fair and that it will be a diverse program,” he said. “That’s really been, I think, more than any other particular topic, the main issue that I’m seeing between the lawmakers involved and the governor’s office.”

Opponents of legalization are largely concerned about the prospect of increased DUI cases, Lindsey said. “The DUI question is one that ranges from state to state, where there are some indicators that it really doesn’t do very much to change driving behavior [and] there are other studies that suggest that things do change. Both sides of the debate will point to their respective studies. I’d say, from my perspective, it doesn’t change things substantially. Especially when you compare cannabis-related DUI figures with alcohol, it’s not even close. But there is still concern there, and that will often dominate the discussion with opponents.”

Overall, though, Lindsey is optimistic about the legislation. “I’m very excited. I think it’s going to be a very good bill, and there are some innovative things in there that I’m looking forward to talking about that I think other states will notice and want to consider for their own programs."
------------------------------------------------------
Sorry I keep posting this stuff about Illinois, but I am really excited about this prospect. I have only been waiting 50 years for this to happen... :nod:
 
Last edited:

macbill

Oh No! Mr macbill!!
Staff member
The Company Behind Miracle-Gro Is Seeing Surging Sales Thanks to Pot Growers

Revenue more than tripled at the company’s Hawthorne business, which supplies specialty fertilizers and growing equipment to marijuana growers, helped by the acquisition of a leading distributor. Sales climbed 21 percent when calculated as if the new business were owned last year, Chris Hagedorn said.

=============================================================================

Marijuana Investor Gives $9 Million To Harvard And MIT For Cannabis Science

In what is believed to be the largest private gift yet to support scientific research on cannabis, a donor is giving $9 million to support Harvard and MIT work on cannabis and its effects on the brain.
 
Last edited:

macbill

Oh No! Mr macbill!!
Staff member
VA Comes Out Against Bills on Medical Marijuana for Veterans

The Department of Veterans Affairs opposes three legislative proposals that would expand research on medical marijuana at the VA and give veterans access to the drug in states where it is legal.

During a hearing Tuesday on eight VA health-related bills under consideration by Congress, VA officials told House lawmakers that as long as marijuana is illegal under federal law, the department cannot support legislation that promotes its role at the VA.
 

MinnBobber

Well-Known Member
VA Comes Out Against Bills on Medical Marijuana for Veterans

The Department of Veterans Affairs opposes three legislative proposals that would expand research on medical marijuana at the VA and give veterans access to the drug in states where it is legal.

During a hearing Tuesday on eight VA health-related bills under consideration by Congress, VA officials told House lawmakers that as long as marijuana is illegal under federal law, the department cannot support legislation that promotes its role at the VA.
...................
Those fockers. I assist older vets which the VA loves to give big pharma buffet of drugs and electro shock therapy when Israeli research is showing great results with cannabis for PTSD.
Cannabis should be the first choice for them?!
 

hd_rider

Well-Known Member
Those fockers. I assist older vets which the VA loves to give big pharma buffet of drugs and electro shock therapy when Israeli research is showing great results with cannabis for PTSD. Cannabis should be the first choice for them?!

The Veteran's Administration is a federal agency and therefore must adhere to federal law. As of right now, cannabis is a Schedule I drug. The VA couldn't prescribe / allow cannabis even if they wanted to.

Although many medical professionals agree with you in that cannabis appears to help many with PTSD, they cannot legally prescribe or recommend a prohibited drug as a treatment option.

I watched the grass is greener recently on Netflix and the schedule one designation on cannabis has to change.

This is correct and the only thing standing in the way of legalization / decriminalization. It's also the same thing holding up legitimate cannabis banking activities, unrestricted research into the medical benefits / uses of cannabis, and more.

But until the pharmaceutical companies are out of the pockets of politicians and law enforcement stops looking for government grants based on how much "marijuana" is taken off the streets / number of drug arrests, we will have to continue fighting for some time I am afraid.
 

ClearBlueLou

unbearably light in the being....
Fighting is the thing: we need to make sure that EVERY Congress critter knows that cannabis comes off-schedule, and all punitive laws get struck - federal *and* state, that we ARE watching, and we WILL vote them out. Anything short of that is a non-starter.
 

C No Ego

Well-Known Member
I watched the grass is greener recently on Netflix and the schedule one designation on cannabis has to change.

39 years !!!

https://news.weedmaps.com/2019/05/longest-held-u-s-pot-prisoner-84-is-freed-but-faces-more-trouble/

the scheduling needs to catch up to real time... we now have patented cannabis for medical use! a plant can't be patented for medicine and stay in drug scheduling as well . well, with cannabis it can... WTF? a revamp of the system ... get the folks running the system together and make some fucking sense here
 

hans solo

Left coast Canada
the scheduling needs to catch up to real time... we now have patented cannabis for medical use! a plant can't be patented for medicine and stay in drug scheduling as well . well, with cannabis it can... WTF? a revamp of the system ... get the folks running the system together and make some fucking sense here

So true , being Canadian my knowledge of US politics is limited but since the majority of Americans are in favour of legalization it is only a matter of time. The damage Nixon and Reagan did needs to be reversed.
 

cybrguy

Putin is a War Criminal
Sponsor of recreational cannabis bill tries to calm concerns from critics

State Rep. Mary Flowers, D-Chicago, state Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, and Gov. J.B. Pritzker talk about cannabis legalization


The chief sponsor of a Senate bill to tax and regulate adult use of recreational cannabis is answering some of the concerns raised by critics.

Some observers speculated that an amendment to Senate Bill 7 would be filed this week, finally revealing how exactly the state might go about making recreational cannabis legal for adult use. With the end of the session set for May 31, such an amendment has yet to be filed.

State Rep. Mary Flowers, D-Chicago, said she has concerns for her community.

“I don't see where the community is going to benefit and quite frankly I don’t see where the state is going to benefit,” Flowers said.

Gov. J.B. Pritzker's budget proposal relies on $170 million from recreational cannabis licensing fees.

Flowers said she's worried about the possible social costs.

State Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, said Flowers’ concerns are legitimate. However, she said legalization isn't an endorsement.

“What it does do is say ‘we know that people are getting a safe product and you know that they’re now going to card people or to make sure that they’re not under 21 [years old], so you’re really limiting it,” Steans said.

Pritzker said he wants to ensure that the industry is open to communities that have been hardest hit by the war on drugs.

“One of my No. 1 focus areas for this has been equity and making sure that we’re addressing the fact that the war on drugs’ most ill-affected communities of color, we want to make sure that this bill addresses the historical discrimination that’s existed and also give people a new opportunity to create new businesses,” Pritzker said Monday.

Flowers said she doubted minorities would be able to secure a spot in the industry. She also said she doubted the black community would benefit at all.

“Their lives have not been made better, nor have their families lives been made better,” Flowers said. “We haven’t even had that discussion."

Steans said there will be new license categories with cheaper licenses and certain funding mechanisms “to help social equity applicants get both reduced application fees, but also to help get grants and loans to help to start up … and then we want to do expungement to help people expunge records that relate to cannabis.”

Lawmakers are finding common ground on all of these issues and other with stakeholders, Steans said. However, the issue of whether to allow recreational marijuana to be grown in homes remains a point of contention.

“Generally speaking, home grow is important,” Steans said. “It’s going to be very expensive. We want people to have access at lower amounts, so we’re going to see if we can make home grow work at a very limited fashion.”

Pritzker has said he supports limited home cultivation.

The law enforcement community has been opposed to any home-grow provision. Some ideas proposed include only allowing home grow for medical cannabis patients.

Lawmakers are back to session Tuesday.
 

cybrguy

Putin is a War Criminal
The panic of the opposition so often ends up watering the program down with last minute tweaks just to get it over the finish line. I hope they are able to resist and get something practical that gets enough tax revenue without making product too much higher than black market prices. I guess that is the formula most difficult to calculate.

At least at this point in the history of legal production in the US we have a much better idea of what it actually costs to produce large scale so that element isn't a guess any longer as it may have been when Colorado went legal. More of the unknowns are known. And scaling up from legal medical should be easier than starting from scratch.

I like that Pritzker is insistent that communities most effected by the war on drugs get a piece of the production business. I think that is appropriate and worth doing. We'll see if he means it.
 
Last edited:

ClearBlueLou

unbearably light in the being....
We’re going to fail in our goal to free the weed if we stay tangled up in the notion that current ‘efforts’ will end up amounting to actual legality. What we’re seeing is a massive transfer of an illegal industry into the hands of quasi-legal industry (the line between legal and illegal business has blurred to invisibility).

The only way communities of color will get a piece of the action this way is as fronts for the usual suspects, much like was seen in the early days of setting aside for ‘minority-owned businesses’.

We don’t need to ‘reform’ or replace cannabis laws, we don’t need *different* cannabis laws - we need to strike them from the books: we know this is bullshit, *they* know this is bullshit, we need to find a way to turn the screw that matters, demand common-sense removal of bullshit cannabis taxes and restrictions at every level.

We need to demand more, and better. We need to critique the debate, not fit into it. We need to be ready to smash stupid and disproved notions, not explain endlessly in hopes of persuasion. We need to harangue and harass our ‘representatives’ until they start representing us. The anti-cannabis forces have never been shy in their approach to public debate, public policy, and public accountability: its time to be just as annoying and aggressive in communicating with legislatures as anti-abortion activists. If this is important, then we need to ACT like this is IMPORTANT.

We don’t need to bitch at our friends about the stupids, we need to confront them.
 
Top Bottom