Cannabis News

psychonaut

Company Rep
Company Rep
Interesting. Vaporizing instead of smoking is a positive IMO. I wonder what these teens are treating? Depression? Anxiety? Coping with their addiction to harmful social media?

I won't advocate teen use. I did it, sure, like many of us, but this is really big tobacco and big pharma, once again, lobbying their crony's.

EDIT: Teen suicide rates are at an all time high, that doesn't make news eh?
 

florduh

Well-Known Member
Interesting. Vaporizing instead of smoking is a positive IMO. I wonder what these teens are treating? Depression? Anxiety? Coping with their addiction to harmful social media?

I won't advocate teen use. I did it, sure, like many of us, but this is really big tobacco and big pharma, once again, lobbying their crony's.

EDIT: Teen suicide rates are at an all time high, that doesn't make news eh?

Teens have been smoking weed forever.

The FDA should be happy there is a healthier alternative.

Sorry, but they aren't going to get teens to stop doing drugs. The government has been trying to do that for decades. "Just Say No" was always doomed to fail.
 

t-dub

Vapor Sloth
"Just Say No" was always doomed to fail.
So is the "War on Drugs" started by Nixon. Over a trillion dollars spent and do you think they have kept a single joint out of any kid's hands that really wanted to have one? Or any other drug for that matter?

Alcohol prohibition proved that prohibition creates black markets and violence. Alcohol prohibition made Al Capone and others rich and very violent, while drug prohibition now makes Mexican drug cartels, and others, rich and just look at the violence today. Prohibition does NOT work. But try to explain this to a religious right controlling moron and all you get is a blank, confused, stare. They just don't get it.

Prohibition does NOT work. Just look at WA state. They put such high taxes on MMJ that people are actually selling black market meds in the parking lots of dispensaries.

So in an attempt to destroy the black market they made taxes so high that they created a black market :doh:

When something is "prohibited" only criminals will have access to it. Education and regulation do what is possible to help the situation, but the human condition will always have "casualties" in this area, and others, like firearms for example.

It's part of the price we pay for freedom . . . :peace:

Edit: If you want to be truly free you must think for yourself rather than repeating what other people say or what they want you to think!!! This takes work, study, thought, effort, and engaging your mind instead of just being chattel. There is no free lunch and Liberty is a perfect example of this.
 
Last edited:

looney2nz

Research Geek, Mad Scientist
My take on this
These teens are using nicotine devices with Cannabis cartridges.
The ingredients which have yet to be tested.
Shades of solvent green.

I don't know from the nicotine vapes :(

Cannabis concentrates in cartridges are finally getting scrutinized much more closely than those flavored nicotine ejuice cartridges :( Sadly, it's still the wild wild west for both.
 

florduh

Well-Known Member
My take on this
These teens are using nicotine devices with Cannabis cartridges.
The ingredients which have yet to be tested.
Shades of solvent green.

It depends on where they are getting their cannabis cartridges from. In California they are tested, and most now are pure cannabis oil. Very few carts are cut with anything other than terpenes these days. And plenty are available with only natural cannabis terps.

But even vaping propylene glycol in nicotine vape cartridges is safer than combusting anything. That's why the FDA's little tantrum is idiotic.
 

hibeam

alpha +
They should really be much more worried about the kids huffing spray paint, gasoline, freon, glue, liquid paper, snorting Rohypnol, you name it. Most of the students in my special education classes in TX were there because of inhalant abuse that had literally fried their brains from when they were 8 or 9 years old. The other kids called them the spooks.

Gone are the tribal days in which psychoactive substances were tools of education.
 
Last edited:

florduh

Well-Known Member
1 in 20 Deaths Worldwide are due to Alcohol

More than 3 million people died as a result of harmful use of alcohol in 2016, according a report released by the World Health Organization (WHO) today. This represents 1 in 20 deaths. More than three quarters of these deaths were among men. Overall, the harmful use of alcohol causes more than 5% of the global disease burden.

Given how deadly alcohol is, you'd think Governments would be happy about more people choosing Cannabis, over a deadly poison like alcohol. Keep in mind, a recent study by the Lancet shows there is no such thing as a safe level of alcohol consumption. Any potential health benefit is outweighed by the increased risk of cancer and heart disease.

 

macbill

Oh No! Mr macbill!!
Staff member
Marijuana use is now as common among baby boomers as it is among teens, federal data shows

VKSO44THIZCU3AXSIYLDRJQAOU.jpg
 

steama

Well-Known Member
Some real crazy shit, fresh from the good old USA
Canadians could be banned from the
US forever if they smoke legal pot


MONTREAL – In less than a month, Canada’s ten provinces and three territories will join nine American states and Washington D.C. that have fully legalized the recreational consumption of marijuana.

But even after October 17th, a Canadian citizen who drives from Vancouver to Seattle may be asked by a border agent if they have smoked pot before, and if they say yes, they could get banned from entry to the U.S. for life, even though pot is legal in Washington state.

Marijuana remains illegal under U.S. federal law, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has long sought to keep those who consume the substance out of the country.

Agents screening foreign nationals attempting to enter the U.S. are therefore allowed to deem a foreigner inadmissible to the United States if they admit to having consumed marijuana in the past. Asking people about their drug use is entirely at the discretion of a border agent, and if someone lies or is unwilling to answer, agents are allowed to search a person’s belongings for evidence of past drug use, including their cell phone.

The assumption by the Canadian legal community had been that this border policy would come to an end following legalization. However, the U.S. government confirmed earlier this month that the policy will continue to apply to Canadians crossing into the U.S. after October 17th, and CBP has said that changes in a foreign country’s laws won’t impact their practices at home.

“This is U.S. law, and under U.S. federal law, marijuana remains illegal”, a spokesperson from CBP told Fox News.

Canada’s ministries of Justice and Public Safety, which are jointly overseeing the process of marijuana legalization, have said they are continuing to work closely with the U.S. government to ensure that there is as little disruption for Canadians travelling to the U.S. as possible once marijuana is legalized next month.

However, a spokesperson from Public Safety Canada reached by Fox News did not express optimism that the current situation at the border would change significantly soon.

“The United States has the sovereign jurisdiction to deal with people crossing the border into their country, just as we have the same powers for those entering into Canada,” the spokesperson said. However, they emphasized that “despite one-in-eight Canadians using cannabis today, 400,000 people move between our two countries every day almost entirely without incident.”

The Canadian government has long urged its citizens not to lie if a U.S. border agent asks about their pot use.

If an agent is able to find evidence from someone who claims they have not smoked pot before that indicates otherwise, they can still be banned from entry to the U.S. anyway — in this case, for lying to a customs officer.

Even Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has long been open about his past use of marijuana, said this month that he would never lie to a U.S. border agent if he was asked if he had used cannabis.

Concerns have also been raised about how this policy will impact employees of marijuana stores in Canada, which will — in many provinces — be run by the government. Even if someone who works for the stores doesn’t consume marijuana themselves, a U.S. customs officer could find legal grounds to ban them from entry to America.

At least one American lawyer has argued that this could even apply to the premier - the Canadian equivalent of a governor - of a province, because of government-owned dispensaries in places including British Columbia and Québec.

CBP confirmed to Fox News that anyone who works in the marijuana industry could be subject to a ban from entry to the U.S., whether they work for a government-run pot dispensary or one in the private sector.

“Working in or facilitating the proliferation of the marijuana industry in Canada, or U.S. states where it is deemed legal, may affect a foreign national’s admissibility to the United States”, a spokesperson said. The spokesperson did not directly respond when asked by Fox News if elected officials in governments that run their own dispensary chains would be exempt from this policy.

In an interview with a Vancouver radio station last month, lawyer Len Saunders called that potential detail “the worst-case scenario” for Canadian provincial governments.

Despite the ban on pot smokers and pot sellers, the U.S. government seems to have less of a problem with actual pot entering the U.S. from Canada.

Weed imports from British Columbia-based Tilray Inc. received the okay from the D.E.A. several days ago, for use in a study on medical cannabis being conducted by University of California San Diego.

Canadians who end up getting hit with a lifetime ban at the border can apply for a waiver from CBP that will allow them to come to America. Once they apply for it — at a cost of over $500, there’s no guarantee that waiver will be approved.

Meanwhile, American expatriates living in Canada, as well as American tourists returning home from a trip to Canada, won’t have to worry about being locked out of their home country if they smoked legal pot north of the border: CBP’s policy only applies to foreign nationals.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/2...anned-from-us-forever-if-smoke-legal-pot.html

:myday:
 

florduh

Well-Known Member
Some real crazy shit, fresh from the good old USA
Canadians could be banned from the
US forever if they smoke legal pot


MONTREAL – In less than a month, Canada’s ten provinces and three territories will join nine American states and Washington D.C. that have fully legalized the recreational consumption of marijuana.

But even after October 17th, a Canadian citizen who drives from Vancouver to Seattle may be asked by a border agent if they have smoked pot before, and if they say yes, they could get banned from entry to the U.S. for life, even though pot is legal in Washington state.

Marijuana remains illegal under U.S. federal law, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has long sought to keep those who consume the substance out of the country.

Agents screening foreign nationals attempting to enter the U.S. are therefore allowed to deem a foreigner inadmissible to the United States if they admit to having consumed marijuana in the past. Asking people about their drug use is entirely at the discretion of a border agent, and if someone lies or is unwilling to answer, agents are allowed to search a person’s belongings for evidence of past drug use, including their cell phone.

The assumption by the Canadian legal community had been that this border policy would come to an end following legalization. However, the U.S. government confirmed earlier this month that the policy will continue to apply to Canadians crossing into the U.S. after October 17th, and CBP has said that changes in a foreign country’s laws won’t impact their practices at home.

“This is U.S. law, and under U.S. federal law, marijuana remains illegal”, a spokesperson from CBP told Fox News.

Canada’s ministries of Justice and Public Safety, which are jointly overseeing the process of marijuana legalization, have said they are continuing to work closely with the U.S. government to ensure that there is as little disruption for Canadians travelling to the U.S. as possible once marijuana is legalized next month.

However, a spokesperson from Public Safety Canada reached by Fox News did not express optimism that the current situation at the border would change significantly soon.

“The United States has the sovereign jurisdiction to deal with people crossing the border into their country, just as we have the same powers for those entering into Canada,” the spokesperson said. However, they emphasized that “despite one-in-eight Canadians using cannabis today, 400,000 people move between our two countries every day almost entirely without incident.”

The Canadian government has long urged its citizens not to lie if a U.S. border agent asks about their pot use.

If an agent is able to find evidence from someone who claims they have not smoked pot before that indicates otherwise, they can still be banned from entry to the U.S. anyway — in this case, for lying to a customs officer.

Even Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has long been open about his past use of marijuana, said this month that he would never lie to a U.S. border agent if he was asked if he had used cannabis.

Concerns have also been raised about how this policy will impact employees of marijuana stores in Canada, which will — in many provinces — be run by the government. Even if someone who works for the stores doesn’t consume marijuana themselves, a U.S. customs officer could find legal grounds to ban them from entry to America.

At least one American lawyer has argued that this could even apply to the premier - the Canadian equivalent of a governor - of a province, because of government-owned dispensaries in places including British Columbia and Québec.

CBP confirmed to Fox News that anyone who works in the marijuana industry could be subject to a ban from entry to the U.S., whether they work for a government-run pot dispensary or one in the private sector.

“Working in or facilitating the proliferation of the marijuana industry in Canada, or U.S. states where it is deemed legal, may affect a foreign national’s admissibility to the United States”, a spokesperson said. The spokesperson did not directly respond when asked by Fox News if elected officials in governments that run their own dispensary chains would be exempt from this policy.

In an interview with a Vancouver radio station last month, lawyer Len Saunders called that potential detail “the worst-case scenario” for Canadian provincial governments.

Despite the ban on pot smokers and pot sellers, the U.S. government seems to have less of a problem with actual pot entering the U.S. from Canada.

Weed imports from British Columbia-based Tilray Inc. received the okay from the D.E.A. several days ago, for use in a study on medical cannabis being conducted by University of California San Diego.

Canadians who end up getting hit with a lifetime ban at the border can apply for a waiver from CBP that will allow them to come to America. Once they apply for it — at a cost of over $500, there’s no guarantee that waiver will be approved.

Meanwhile, American expatriates living in Canada, as well as American tourists returning home from a trip to Canada, won’t have to worry about being locked out of their home country if they smoked legal pot north of the border: CBP’s policy only applies to foreign nationals.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/2...anned-from-us-forever-if-smoke-legal-pot.html

:myday:

The genial response from Canada's Prime Minister about the US's idiocy was so measured. Can you imagine if the shoe was on the other foot?

"The PEOPLE of America don't want to go to GOOFY JUSTIN's 'country' anyway!! LOW CLASS CANADA is ripping us off VERY STRONGLY! GOOFY JUSTIN will be BEGGING me to let our pot heads in before long! BELIEVE ME! WITCH HUNT!!!!!"
 

Nooky72

Dog Marley
Stumbled across this great little article on the projectcbd.org website about the bias, misinformation and prejudice that still exists in many articles released about marijuana, which often don't help our cause. It also highlights some useful tips and signs on what to look out for to help determine whether an article is credible or not.

https://www.projectcbd.org/cannabis-science-what-believe
 

macbill

Oh No! Mr macbill!!
Staff member
Marijuana Employment: Is The Budtender Position A Dead End Job?

Right out the gate, some protectors of the cannabis industry will argue, no, there isn't a single position in the world of cannabis commerce that could be considered dead-end. After all, some of the [URL='https://blog.vangst.com/cannabis-salary-guide-2018/']latest statistics
show that cannabis-related jobs have increased by 690 percent over the past year, with average salaries growing by more than 16 percent. And when it comes to accepting a position as a Budtender, those employees can expect to earn between $12 and $16 per hour. So no sir, no way is anyone employed with the cannabis sector at risk of losing themselves inside the dark circle of mediocrity and poverty as a result of joining this new legion of weed dealer known as Budtenders.[/URL]
 

grampa_herb

Epstein didn't kill himself
Up in Smoke: How Marijuana Will Change Our Economy
By Mark Nestmann • September 25, 2018


It was the summer of 1965, and I was recuperating from a broken arm in the home where I grew up in West Virginia. I couldn’t swim or play baseball with my friends since I had a cast on my arm, and I was bored silly. Looking for something to read, I leafed through an old medical textbook that my father, a physician, owned. It had been published around 1915.

To my amazement, the textbook contained an entire chapter on cannabis, the scientific name for the plant also known as marijuana. It detailed all sorts of emulsions and concentrates that could be used to treat various maladies. But those treatments had long been criminalized, thanks to the Marijuana Tax Act and subsequent legislation.

A decade later, I was asleep in my dorm room at college when I heard my roommate, who I’ll call Jim, throwing up after drinking too much the night before. After a few minutes, his vomiting progressed to dry heaves, an attempt to vomit without actually doing so.

The noise (and the smell) woke me up, and I got Jim a glass of water to settle his stomach. But he vomited the water back up immediately.

Our friend Dale walked into our room. He lit up a hand-rolled cigarette that had the unmistakable odor of cannabis. “Smoke this,” he told Jim.

After just one “hit,” Jim was able to drink an entire glass of water without throwing up. And an hour later, he was eating lunch in the dining hall.

Once I saw for myself how cannabis could curb nausea and vomiting, I remembered reading about its many therapeutic uses in my father’s old textbook. So I wasn’t surprised to learn a few years later that cancer patients were using it to help control the nausea and vomiting that often accompanies chemotherapy.

But possessing cannabis was then, and still is, a federal crime. The Controlled Substances Act classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug – one with high abuse potential, severe safety concerns, and no legitimate medical use.

Based on my personal experience, I knew cannabis did have legitimate medical uses. And my convictions were strengthened when my colleague, fellow libertarian author Peter McWilliams, was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the 1990s. Peter was able to control the pain and vomiting associated with his condition with cannabis but was arrested for cultivating the drug in 1997. He was released on bail only on the condition that he not use marijuana.

Three years later, vomiting and in great pain, Peter died. Since then, I’ve considered Peter and other cancer patients who were denied permission to use cannabis as having been tortured by the US government.

But things are beginning to change. Most states now permit individuals with cancer and other debilitating diseases the right to purchase cannabis. And researchers have rediscovered that cannabis has countless medical uses.

For instance, cannabis can slow the spread of some cancer cells. It can also ease the debilitating effects of neurological conditions like epilepsy and multiple sclerosis, and it can reduce pain. Ongoing research has also shown promise for cannabis to treat Alzheimer’s, Crohn’s disease, and dermatological conditions like eczema and psoriasis.

Ironically, cannabis, a substance that federal law considers to have no legitimate medical use, is now being used to help individuals addicted to prescription opioids and heroin. In 2017, nearly 50,000 Americans died from opioid overdoses. Cannabis has also shown promise in the treatment of post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD).

If Congress reclassifies cannabis so that it can once again be legally prescribed by medical practitioners or used for recreationally, it will have an enormously positive economic impact in the US. For proof, look to Colorado, which legalized cannabis in 2012. A study published in March showed that a taxed and regulated cannabis industry contributed more than $58 million to the local economy of Pueblo County, one of 64 counties in Colorado.

That’s not a fluke. Legalizing cannabis would add more than $100 billion to America’s GDP by 2025, according to a study from the cannabis analytics firm New Frontier. It could also create up to one million new jobs.

Ironically, the biggest obstacle to legalization is the unsupported belief that cannabis is a gateway to more dangerous drugs like cocaine and heroin. The truth is that many of the most promising cannabis-related therapies are derived from non-intoxicating forms of the drug. And while other forms of cannabis are mildly intoxicating, there has never been a documented death from an overdose.

It’s just a matter of time before the federal law that makes cannabis illegal is repealed. But be careful if you plan to cash in on this bonanza. The hype surrounding the prospect for legalization reminds me of the type of corrupt behavior that went on during the dot-com bubble. The relentless pump of stocks as dodgy investors promoted the hell out of the “next Google” was followed by the inevitable dump when investors realized the company was little more than a kid in his mom’s basement.

It will be interesting to see what happens in Canada in the coming months. Our northern neighbors are legalizing marijuana for recreational use, effective October 17, 2018. The changes in the Canadian economy may reveal something about how legalization of marijuana could impact the US.

Before you invest in anything cannabis related, conduct extreme due diligence. Learn everything you can about the industry, the state laws, and federal restrictions. And to ensure you’ve covered all the bases, have your lawyer review the paperwork before you make any financial commitment.

For now, investing in cannabis remains an aggressive and highly speculative strategy. There’s scope for a long-term payoff, but don’t expect an easy journey.

Protecting your assets (and yourself) against any threat - from the government, the IRS or a frivolous lawsuit - is something The Nestmann Group has helped more than 15,000 Americans do over the last 30 years.
 

Tranquility

Well-Known Member
https://hempindustrydaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/DEAEpidiolex-Opinion.pdf

With the issuance of this final order, the Acting Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration places certain drug products that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and which contain cannabidiol (CBD) in schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Specifically, this order places FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols in schedule V.​
 

looney2nz

Research Geek, Mad Scientist
interesting, since the line of definition for industrial hemp is 0.3% THC, so now they are restricting it to no more that 0.1%, and WHY precisely? :(
 
Top Bottom