Calling all DaVinci IQ and Grasshopper owners: share your experiences with me

Hello all in FC land!

I'm conducting a survey on both the IQ and the Grasshopper vapes, because I want to better understand the risk involved with purchasing one. Is playing vape tag through the mail a certainty, or are reports of faulty units just blown out of proportion by the few who are unlucky enough to have a unit that fell through the QA cracks, so to speak? So I've written up a survey for each vaporizer to get a better idea of just how problematic these vapes are.

I'm asking any and all owners of the Davinci IQ or the Grasshopper to participate. In fact, this will yield better info the more people who participate, so tell your friends! Results will not be shown immediately, I will wait several days to accumulate responses before I decide whether my sample size is large enough to glean anything useful from the data. And most questions are optional, so skip any that don't apply, or you don't know. I think that about covers everything you need to know before you get started, so now for the links. Both go to google forms surveys.

DaVinci IQ owners click here

Grasshopper owners click here

Thanks for your time and contributions

What?

Mr. Gweilo 420 said:

What?

Click to expand...

Not sure what the issue is? I just filled out the survey for the GH.

Determination of whether we are seeing flawed products or self-selection and disproportionate number of posters that had issues and hence needed help.

Its a good question but not at all sure that this survey will provide any answers.

My GH has gone strong without a hiccup for about 9 months or so. However, I hesitate to purchase another or recommend it to newer vaporists as they still seem to have a high infant mortality/DOA rate and they still have ambigous and confusing failure symptoms (with people trying to parse the type of flickering lights and divine WTF is really going one). Units that seem to fail, are RMA'd with no change, but then seem to work again...for a while...then not or perhaps still...or perhaps...you see what I'm saying.

I would love it if Hopper Labs itself, who is the only ones with the full data set, to publish real failure data (that less than 5% is meaningless from a reliability engineering POV) and put this question to rest.

So, I think that @dubblydubbly is doing a good deed here but I'm still not sure it will be fruitful in a meaningful way.