TinyMight / TM 2

khelek41girl

Well-Known Member
Accessory Maker
@khelek41girl hows the vapor potency compare between the TetraX and the tinymight?

Also have you abandoned the idea of a fully wooden stem?


I would say that honestly, the TetraX had the better flavor, but overall potency is about the same. They are both extremely powerful and produce excellent vapor, but where the TetraX wins in flavor and even roasting, the TM wins in every other aspect.

In regards to all wooden stems, I don't believe it would be a good idea. The stem would go all the way down pretty much to the heater, and that would cause the wood to either get too hot and burn, or could release oils in the wood that might not be healthy to the user. I will still probably make a couple for testing purposes to prove my theories wrong, but otherwise, I think the all glass air path with the wood sleeve would be the safest option
 

Brewervapesalot

Well-Known Member
I think a metal tube (right?) would get much hotter compared to a glass tube.

Probably. But metal does not break. I'd just like the option because of that. Also if the tube gets hot, the vapor likely cools more as heat is transferred from the vapor into the tube material? If the metal stem was long enough, or had a wooden sleeve, it wouldnt be hot on the lips? Titanium might cool quicker than stainless?

I would say that honestly, the TetraX had the better flavor, but overall potency is about the same. They are both extremely powerful and produce excellent vapor, but where the TetraX wins in flavor and even roasting, the TM wins in every other aspect.

:tup: thanks that's kinda what I was thinking as to flavor based on the designs (more metal in TinyMight).

The Lemart design doesn't quite pull me in yet. Although quicker heat up than evo, so that's a big plus for an at home unit.

Probably just need every vaporizer ever made then I wont have to worry about such things...:D
 
Last edited:

Shit Snacks

Milaana. Lana. LANA. LANAAAA! (TM2/TP80/BAK/FW9)
I have taken to using a basket screen to trap the herb in between the cooling unit and the
bottom of the stem. Loading directly against the cooling unit and pressing into place was causing to much draw restriction. I like to draw directly into the lungs, instead of puffing like a cigar. Keeping the
load loose allows nice long draws with little drag.

Hm can you share a picture or more detail on what the setup is exactly? Sounds like I might have to do this to mine as well... Thanks bud!

But, reading the thread, there is just way too much tech talk about the power supply, wattage, and electronic's settings and such. It's a turn off to me. I don't want complicated in a portable or need to understand that stuff for portable, or really even a desktop. Makes me think the unit is not simple to use, which for a portable, IMO, is the most important requirement. Also the more awkward size made me think it was more a battery powered desktop. My cloud Evo with an extension cord fills that vapes roll in the line up for me, probably much better in terms of clouds, etc.

Not that this is the place for it, but I think you have a misrepresentation of the Tetra P80, there is no power supply (? like there's an aftermarket accessory to turn it into a desktop instead of a battery portable, but people don't talk about it much and it's hardly necessary) and nothing about wattage or any electronic settings you need to touch... It indeed arrives ready-to-use out of the box and is quite simple honestly... There are other vapes that use mods where you may have to configure stuff (but even those don't really require configuration and tend to be simpler than they seem in my experience). As far as "awkward size" goes, I think the size and portability is actually pretty close despite their shapes... I will be able to compare them directly soon enough, but from what I can see they're quite comparable (though the TM does seem more sleek -- and I do also like a dial, sure that is going to be simpler than a screen with full temp control, but not necessarily easier to use imo). That also kind of sounded like a joke if you are comparing Tubo to a Cloud Evo with an extension cord, it is far more portable (and potentially capable) than that! If anything, the tetra heater is more like the cloud evo combined with the tinymight, offering digital control and extra optional features... but I digress! :p
 
Last edited:

Brewervapesalot

Well-Known Member
Hm can you share a picture or more detail on what the setup is exactly? Sounds like I might have to do this to mine as well... Thanks bud!



Not that this is the place for it, but I think you have a misrepresentation of the Tetra P80, there is no power supply (? like there's an aftermarket accessory to turn it into a desktop instead of a battery portable, but people don't talk about it much and it's hardly necessary) and nothing about wattage or any electronic settings you need to touch... It indeed arrives ready-to-use out of the box and is quite simple honestly... There are other vapes that use mods where you may have to configure stuff (but even those don't really require configuration and tend to be simpler than they seem in my experience). As far as "awkward size" goes, I think the size and portability is actually pretty close despite their shapes... I will be able to compare them directly soon enough, but from what I can see they're quite comparable (though the TM does seem more sleek -- and I do also like a dial, sure that is going to be simpler than a screen with full temp control, but not necessarily easier to use imo). That also kind of sounded like a joke if you are comparing Tubo to a Cloud Evo with an extension cord, it is far more portable (and potentially capable) than that! If anything, the tetra heater is more like the cloud evo combined with the tinymight, offering digital control and extra optional features... but I digress! :p

I haven't used this vaporizer, and you're probably right. It looks like a great vaporizer.

My only point was that it doesn't look pocketable as tinymight, the thread--and I only skimmed it--is a bit techy for me, and for $230-$300 a cloud Evo hits all of the boxes it does, plus probably better performance because plug in.

Put another way, if I could have two of three: evo, tetra80, or tinymight--based on what I can tell, i'd rather have tiny might for portable and evo for home use. The tetra80 and other lemart vapes dont seem pocketable, and if their not, a Evo rips at home.

I might buy a tetra80 and fall on love though. I almost bought a few days ago. I'm just giving my reasons for holding back...

Also, the more I use vapes, the less i want digital. Just preference. A simple knob is quick and easy.
 

Shit Snacks

Milaana. Lana. LANA. LANAAAA! (TM2/TP80/BAK/FW9)
I haven't used this vaporizer, and you're probably right. It looks like a great vaporizer.

My only point was that it doesn't look pocketable as tinymight, the thread--and I only skimmed it--is a bit techy for me, and for $230-$300 a cloud Evo hits all of the boxes it does, plus probably better performance because plug in.

Put another way, if I could have two of three: evo, tetra80, or tinymight--based on what I can tell, i'd rather have tiny might for portable and evo for home use. The tetra80 and other lemart vapes dont seem pocketable, and if their not, a Evo rips at home.

I might buy a tetra80 and fall on love though. I almost bought a few days ago. I'm just giving my reasons for holding back...

Also, the more I use vapes, the less i want digital. Just preference. A simple knob is quick and easy.

I got it, but it's a lot of speculation and totally off topic... I get that it justifies why you didn't want to buy one and why you are sharing it here, but your perspective seems a bit limited to me... Pocketability, I do not think the TM is going to be so good for this either frankly, based on my experience with many of these type of vapes... And having owned a Cloud Evo myself, I can confidently say it does not tick boxes that either of these other two portables do (or several others) at all... I agree the tinymight seems amazing and that is why I pre-ordered as well, but I think comparing vapes you haven't used is just misleading (and again not meant to be done in this thread). I can appreciate your pov though!
 

Siebter

Less soul, more mind
Judging by what I saw on Troys / 420Vapezones latest stream the Tetra P80 is much bulkier than the TM; you can totally store a TM in your jeans pocket (both size and weightwise) esp. with the default short tube, I don't think the Tetra will allow that. It's quite a bit wider in size from what I can see.
 

Brewervapesalot

Well-Known Member
I got it, but it's a lot of speculation and totally off topic... I get that it justifies why you didn't want to buy one and why you are sharing it here, but your perspective seems a bit limited to me... Pocketability, I do not think the TM is going to be so good for this either frankly, based on my experience with many of these type of vapes... And having owned a Cloud Evo myself, I can confidently say it does not tick boxes that either of these other two portables do (or several others) at all... I agree the tinymight seems amazing and that is why I pre-ordered as well, but I think comparing vapes you haven't used is just misleading (and again not meant to be done in this thread). I can appreciate your pov though!

I hear ya, but its definitely relevant and appropriate to comment on new vapes and ones we have not tried.

I put a link to the tetra80 thread in this thread precisely because they're new. And I was debating which to buy. My order from tiny might expired. And like 20 of the tetra80's became available. At that time we didnt know tinymights would be shipped soon.

I doubt I was the only one thinking about going for a tetra80 instead of tiny might. Talking about which to purchase and giving opinions is exactly what these threads are about...

But just by looking at it, I see tetra80 as like a cordless phone at home. Boxy and weird shaped. Those corners wont fit my pocket nicely. The only downside to your pocket for a tiny might is the glass stem. But that can be carried separately.

Again, it's the shape of the tetra80 that its downside. I'd rather have a plug in if I had to choose. It's a fair point about flavor though. It appears to have better flavor. If Lamart can make that vaporizer in a better, pocketable, housing then I definitely will buy.
 

Siebter

Less soul, more mind
The only downside to your pocket for a tiny might is the glass stem. But that can be carried separately.

If you do so, you indeed don't have to worry at all, because without the tube the Tinymight basically is just a block of oak wood with two aluminum cover plates. Very compact, very sturdy. But even with the tube inserted it's definitely not fragile. The glass seems to be of high quality too. When using the short tube the majority it is covered by the device. And while I think the glass is of good quality (because it survived a pretty dramatic accident), I still prefer it to break in case of an accident instead of a metal tube ruining the entire device. :-)
 

L0RDVAP0R

Active Member
I had a Tubo Evic and the tetra 80 is a bigger version, and the Tubo wasn't very pocketable. The TinyMight slides right into my pocket with no issue and I'm wearing slim fit jeans so its not like like I'm wearing a pair of JNCO jeans. The Firewood 5 is more pocketable and produces a better tasting vapor at the max heat. I'm not sure what the variance in temp is when on a 10 with a TinyMight compared to a level 4 stepped up to the max is but at lower temps the TinyMight has very good taste.

The only issue I have is that removing the battery is a hassle compared to the firewood or the Tubo.

The Tubo is more customizable but you can combust with it, when I max out the TinyMight it extracts really well and no concern about combusting. To be honest if you go with a majority of the artisan wood vapes you are going to get a great experience.
 

muunch

hotboxing the cockpit
I had a Tubo Evic and the tetra 80 is a bigger version

This is not true. The Tetra P80 is smaller than even single battery Tubo/Tetra Evic.

There are plenty of pictures in the thread to corroborate this.

Sorry for off-topic... But, If we're going to continue on with listing positive/negatives, I still think metal in the airpath is not desirable and I still don't understand who makes this vaporizer and would really like some clarifications regarding that. There was a similar vaporizer from a similar location that had notorious CS issues and I think some transparency about the facts is more pertinent than honeymooning anecdotes. Would love to see pics of the heater and some new cooling unit pics.
 
Last edited:

Facticity

Well-Known Member
I still don't understand who makes this vaporizer and would really like some clarifications regarding that.

If you look through the earlier posts in this thread, you'll find that this topic has been discussed ad nauseum. You are free to do your own investigating and report back if you get somewhere, but in my 40+ days with the Tm, I have had excellent, quick communication with the manufacturer and zero reliability issues. This is while using the unit 2-3+ times almost every day, including taking it to two very different climates.
 

pakalolo

Toolbag v1.1 (candidate)
Staff member
I hear ya, but its definitely relevant and appropriate to comment on new vapes and ones we have not tried.

No, not here. We frown upon comparisons between devices in threads for a specific model. A lot of recent posts have drifted in that direction. Please make a comparison thread in Ask FC and take such discussions there. Thanks for your cooperation.
 

Brewervapesalot

Well-Known Member
This is not true. The Tetra P80 is smaller than even single battery Tubo/Tetra Evic.

There are plenty of pictures in the thread to corroborate this.

Sorry for off-topic... But, If we're going to continue on with listing positive/negatives, I still think metal in the airpath is not desirable and I still don't understand who makes this vaporizer and would really like some clarifications regarding that. There was a similar vaporizer from a similar location that had notorious CS issues and I think some transparency about the facts is more pertinent than honeymooning anecdotes. Would love to see pics of the heater and some new cooling unit pics.


From vapelife forum, it was a pretty strong argument that the guy that made the apollo makes tinymight. New company it appears. Either way, it's not much of concern to me. Buying from any small manufacturer means they may not exist in a year.... it's just the risk you take. As far as customer service sucking, that's the risk too. So far this manufacturer has emailed me back in less than 24 hours..

If manufacturer was showing signs of going the way of dodo, like ghost, I would not have preordered. Looks like he just started a new company. Which may or may not matter. Depends how many people he left hanging.

In sum, it's a fair point about the manufacturer. But it's out there and people can buy or not knowing the risk.

Repairs might also be a major issue. But, again, small manufacturers always have this potential issue

Edit: replaceable battery, simple design with somewhat standard mouth pieces means the unit can work long after the company goes away, is also a consideration.
 
Last edited:

muunch

hotboxing the cockpit
If you look through the earlier posts in this thread, you'll find that this topic has been discussed ad nauseum. You are free to do your own investigating and report back if you get somewhere

Sorry - yeah I do see it has been discussed but there has been no confirmation either way, unfortunately. Which only makes things look worse to me, as clearly some people have the knowledge.
 
muunch,
  • Like
Reactions: Dan B

khelek41girl

Well-Known Member
Accessory Maker
Aaannndd were back to beating the dead horse.

From all accounts, the device performance has been stellar, the CS had been on point, and no one has had anything but good things to say about it so far... So quite honestly, who cares? If it is the same people, they have clearly made it a point to better themselves by making a better device and upping their customer service, and if it isn't the same people, then it's a moot point.

Either way, live and let live and get passed it, or maybe find a different device to buy? Just saying, we're kind of past it. If you personally are not passed it, like others have said, do you're own research... But at this point, I think most are over the BS drama of pointing fingers. If you think it's the same person, then don't buy from them. Just means more TinyMights for the people who actually want one, and want to support the TinyMight company

Edit: Sorry, I didn't mean to come off a bit strong here, but this really is a burned out concern that I honestly don't feel like entertaining anymore, after the pages and pages of stupid drama that it caused, making me have to step away from the negativity. I'm just at the point now that if we cant get passed the maker drama BS, I will just simply not participate in this thread anymore and will stick with other forums that are actually supportive of up and coming artisan makers, without bringing speculation and conjecture into the mix
 
Last edited:

Siebter

Less soul, more mind
I still think metal in the airpath is not desirable [...]

Then this device is still not for you, it has quite a massive block of stainless steel right between the herb and your mouth. And I'm quite sure it will stay that way, because this cooling unit is one of the major reasons why this thing works so well. If you don't agree with that, that's okay, but it makes little sense to wait for it to change according to your opinions.
 

Brewervapesalot

Well-Known Member
No, not here. We frown upon comparisons between devices in threads for a specific model. A lot of recent posts have drifted in that direction. Please make a comparison thread in Ask FC and take such discussions there. Thanks for your cooperation.

That's fine, but I dont need to try a vape to point out its square with corners and not pocketable by its looks alone. I can see that from a picture. I dont need to try it to make that comparison..

In other words, why I can't I compare and discuss the Tinymights non square corner appearance to the tetra80's squared, cornered appearance?

Certainly seen pocketablity discussions in other threads....

Same with digital versus analog discussions. There is no need to try the vape to make those, and discuss those, comparisons... it's just preference and opinion. Not speculation.

:2c:
 

Shit Snacks

Milaana. Lana. LANA. LANAAAA! (TM2/TP80/BAK/FW9)
That's fine, but I dont need to try a vape to point out its square with corners and not pocketable by its looks alone. I can see that from a picture. I dont need to try it to make that comparison..

In other words, why I can't I compare and discuss the Tinymights non square corner appearance to the tetra80's squared, cornered appearance?

Certainly seen pocketablity discussions in other threads....

Same with digital versus analog discussions. There is no need to try the vape to make those, and discuss those, comparisons... it's just preference and opinion. Not speculation.

:2c:

BTW he was not telling you that you couldn't say that because you didn't try it, he was telling you that you are not supposed to be talking about the Tetra at all in the tinymight thread! Sorry this is just a classic FC rule that often feels like a gray area, but there has been so much irrelevant discussion here in the TM thread now. This is pretty typical for a vape that has not really been released yet though, all the shipping talk, comparison speculation, and hypothetical analysis... It's not really what the thread is for.
 
Shit Snacks,
  • Like
Reactions: Baron23

TommyDee

Vaporitor
@Facticity - this vape is =tuned= for how its built. It has already been noted that changing shit changes other shit. If better performance has to beat already excellent, then I'm going to put my money on changing shit would make performance worse. I know. I change a lot of shit for the better. You might have to be high to follow that :spliff:
 
TommyDee,
  • Like
Reactions: Facticity
Top Bottom