Cannabis Ruderalis

little maggie

Well-Known Member
I was looking at the dispensary I use and noticed this which is neither indica or sativa. Anyone try this?
 
little maggie,

muunch

hotboxing the cockpit
Should be higher CBD and lower THC but would definitely be interested in learning more info.

If they're half decent, they seem like they'd be amazing for a small spacebucket-type grow. They're pretty tiny and autoflower which is sweet af
 
muunch,

CarolKing

Singer of songs and a vapor connoisseur
I found this on Leafly
You may already know the differences between indica and sativa varieties of cannabis, but have you heard of cannabis ruderalis? According to Jorge Cervantes, grow guru and author of The Cannabis Encyclopedia, “Botanists disagree as to whether c. ruderalis qualifies as a separate species or subspecies.” So, to answer some of the questions we receive about cannabis ruderalis and autoflowering genetics, Leafly has put together a quick background on this lesser-known classification of cannabis strains.

ftNLkG0YT2yFzkg0jnJx_ME%20Ch%2003%20LR%2004%20IM176.jpg
My5yFlYR3OMbDGOdbCWo_ME%20Ch%2003%20LR%2012%20LR2.JPG


The Origin of Cannabis Ruderalis
The term ruderalis stems from the root word ruderal. In the plant world, a ruderal species is one that grows in spite of its environment being inhabited by humans or being otherwise affected by naturally occurring disturbances to the area. Many believe ruderalis to be a descendant of indica genetics that adjusted to the harsh climates and the shorter growing seasons of the northern regions where it originates. Cannabis ruderalis is native to areas in Asia, Central/Eastern Europe, and specifically Russia, where botanists used the term "ruderalis" to classify the breeds of hemp plant that had escaped from human and cultivation, adapting to the extreme environments found in these climates.

Originally, cannabis ruderalis was considered a wild breed of cannabis. However, in recent years it has been brought indoors to influence new hybrid varieties.

lV4Q51pbT3usoUO9dkjH_cannabis_ruderalis3.gif



Properties of Cannabis Ruderalis
Cannabis ruderalis is a short and stalky plant, especially when compared to its sativa and indica counterparts. It typically sits between 1 and 2.5 feet tall at harvest, with a rugged and shaggy growth pattern that produces wide leaflets that express themselves in a light green hue. The buds from the ruderalis plant tend to be small but still relatively chunky, and are supported by the sturdy, thick stems.

What really sets ruderalis apart is its flowering cycle that is induced according to its maturity instead of being activated by the photoperiod like indica and sativa varieties. Modern ruderalis hybrids usually begin to flower between 21 and 30 days after the seeds have been planted, regardless of the light cycle. This is why most ruderalis hybrids are attributed as “autoflowering” strains.

Effects
The effects of cannabis ruderalis alone are minimized by its naturally low concentrations of THC. However, the stability and short lifecycle make ruderalis versatile and attractive to breeders who want to take advantage of its autoflowering trait. Ruderalis genes offer the ability for breeders to create an autoflowering hybrid with the advanced potency and flavor profile from its genetic partner.
 

C No Ego

Well-Known Member
I've gotten some strains with that bred in.... the bud looks great then you open it to find a stem the size of Kansas in there.. ps, don't tell Kansas he he
 
C No Ego,
  • Like
Reactions: duckTape

Deleted Member 1643

Well-Known Member
Autoflowering strains were the inspiration to grow again. It's a challenge to get them as big as possible before they automatically flower, but there's no worry about light leaks. Fine to keep the lights on 24/7 beginning to end. Interesting that they're beginning to compete with traditional photo strains in the marketplace.
 

Whissmu

Well-Known Member
I only growing Autoflowering (coming from rudelaris) outdoors and when summer ends, I am not in favor of putting the Autoflowering under one indoor many people get spectacular productions .. but loses all attraction for me when Not being able to clone .. I like Keep a selected into indoor gene selected for several years ... every cannabis is wonderfull only i select mi strains principal interest and keep for a long time :leaf:
 

Deleted Member 1643

Well-Known Member
but loses all attraction for me when Not being able to clone

Understandable, so it's surprising that seed-grown autos can compete with cloned photos. May switch to photos, but learned a lot growing autos. Why wouldn't you start autos outside as early as you can and get multiple crops through the summer? Just curious, can't grow outdoors.

C. ruderalis plants have fewer fronds on their leaves and are more like house plants than crop plants. This one (reputedly) has an Afghani indica genetic background.

Yjkynfq.jpg
 
Last edited:

Whissmu

Well-Known Member
Why wouldn't you start autos outside as early as you can and get multiple crops through the summer? Just curious, can't grow outdoors.

The reason is that there would be many plants in my garden ...
Before harvesting the regular plants ,i sow the autoflowering and thus dissimulate the number of plants!
Another reason is that I do not invest in autoflowering seeds, as I said I prefer to clone after selecting my strains, so I just have a few seeds from a gift...
 
Whissmu,
  • Like
Reactions: Hjalmark

HighSeasSailor

Well-Known Member
Fascinating thread, I was aware of the ruderalis species but I've never heard of it being sold. From all I've read it's not a particularly prized plant for consumption but I'd never pass on a chance to try it out.
 
HighSeasSailor,
  • Like
Reactions: C No Ego

Deleted Member 1643

Well-Known Member
From all I've read it's not a particularly prized plant for consumption but I'd never pass on a chance to try it out.

If its available at a dispensary, it's probably an autoflowering strain that will have similar effects and flavor to its indica/sativa parent. The ruderalis traits appear to be separable from cannabinoid production.
 

Deleted Member 1643

Well-Known Member
Apologies for double post but discovered a related use for ruderalis that may better explain its presence in dispensaries. Several breeders have created "fast" F1 hybrids of popular strains. It seems what they've done is bred a marketable auto version and then back-crossed this to its indica/sativa parent. The photosensitive trait appears to be dominant, so the F1 is once-again photosensitive. However, it retains the riotous vegetative growth and fast flowering of ruderalis. It should also restore some of the desirable indica/sativa traits that may have been lost in breeding the auto. On top of that, F1 hybrids are generally more vigourous than either of their parents. This could all be a big plus for commercial producers (as well as hobbyists and consumers). Can't wait to try growing one!
 

KidneyStoner

Well-Known Member
Ruderalis is terrible. It's the redheaded step child of cannabis. The only "usefulness that comes of it is when they mix it with strains to get Auto flowering plants, which is also a joke. Once I hear of a strain being crossed with Ruderalis, I look elsewhere for my seeds.
I'd stay clear of all the Ruderalis crap.
 

EverythingsHazy

Well-Known Member
People who write off auroflowers don't know what they are talking about. At this point, many top autos have almost no ruderalis genes, aside from the autoflowering trait. They can also be bred to stabilization in a short period of time, so that even without clones, the offspring have very uniform genotypes/phenotypes.
 
EverythingsHazy,

KidneyStoner

Well-Known Member
People who write off auroflowers don't know what they are talking about. At this point, many top autos have almost no ruderalis genes, aside from the autoflowering trait. They can also be bred to stabilization in a short period of time, so that even without clones, the offspring have very uniform genotypes/phenotypes.

Thanks for your statement, but I most certainly know what I'm talking about.
Ruderalis is a waste of time and effort.
Clones? Who is trying to clone an auto?

If people want to mess around with unstable phenos, have no chance of cloning, having to constantly buy seeds, and grow small Auto flowering plants then it's their perogative, but it's not for me.
Ruderalis is pretty much hemp. THC content is pretty much 0%. For those whom are still learning about Sativa/Indica/Ruderalis, look it up and decide for yourself.
I'll take strong Sativa/Indica photo strains any day of the week. Not being able to clone them is a huge turn off for me and many others as well. Not to mention most strains have a very small, unpredictable yield and are still not stable.
 
Last edited:
KidneyStoner,

KidneyStoner

Well-Known Member
Understandable, so it's surprising that seed-grown autos can compete with cloned photos. May switch to photos, but learned a lot growing autos. Why wouldn't you start autos outside as early as you can and get multiple crops through the summer? Just curious, can't grow outdoors.

C. ruderalis plants have fewer fronds on their leaves and are more like house plants than crop plants. This one (reputedly) has an Afghani indica genetic background.

Yjkynfq.jpg


That plant is a perfect sample of an auto. (Nothing against you or your plant at all ;) ) Looks to be about 6-7 weeks into flower and it's going to yield less than an ounce when cured (looks more like a half ounce or so). To spend $10+ on a seed, I want to get some weight and be able to continue the genetics with clones.
 
KidneyStoner,

EverythingsHazy

Well-Known Member
Thanks for your statement, but I most certainly know what I'm talking about.
Ruderalis is a waste of time and effort.
Clones? Who is trying to clone an auto?

If people want to mess around with unstable phenos, have no chance of cloning, having to constantly buy seeds, and grow small Auto flowering plants then it's their perogative, but it's not for me.
Ruderalis is pretty much hemp. THC content is pretty much 0%. For those whom are still learning about Sativa/Indica/Ruderalis, look it up and decide for yourself.
I'll take strong Sativa/Indica photo strains any day of the week. Not being able to clone them is a huge turn off for me and many others as well. Not to mention most strains have a very small, unpredictable yield and are still not stable.
You are completely ignoring the fact that aside from the autoflowering trait, well bred autoflowers have almost no ruderalis in them. The best ones, bred past f7, are also almost 100% uniform. There are no various phenotype in those. It's simple genetics.
 
Last edited:
EverythingsHazy,

Deleted Member 1643

Well-Known Member
That plant is a perfect sample of an auto.

Thanks! Generally, got about two ounces per plant. With a recent photo grow, got four, but it took longer. (Also, upgraded lamp, so it's not a good comparison.) The champion growers at autoflower.net report yields of over a pound per plant.

Also, all but one auto (Sugar Black Rose from Delicious) gave multiple phenos. So did this recent photo.
With commercial growers cloning, imagine there's little demand for reliable seeds. Surprised to find only a few strains described as true-breeding by their breeders.

Introducing ruderalis traits into the gene pool could be risky, but patient breeders should be able to isolate ruderalis' desirable traits. Its bad reputation might be due to breeders selling seeds before they'd done the number of crosses needed.
 
Top Bottom